长江流域资源与环境 >> 2023, Vol. 32 >> Issue (9): 1949-1959.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202309015

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

水网型城市的蓝绿景观变化对生境质量的影响分析——以南昌市为例

唐燕1,冯兴华1*,曾凡盛1,李建新2,肖泽平1,毕曼玉1   

  1. (1.江西师范大学地理与环境学院,江西 南昌 330022; 2. 江西师范大学 江西经济发展研究院,江西 南昌 330022)
  • 出版日期:2023-09-20 发布日期:2023-09-22

Impact of Blue-green Landscape Changes on Habitat Quality in Water Network Cities:A case study of Nanchang city

TANG Yan1,FENG Xing-hua1,ZENG Fan-sheng1,LI Jian-xin2,XIAO Ze-ping1,BI Man-yu1   

  1. (1. School of Geography and Environment, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China;2. Jiangxi Institute of Economic Development, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China)
  • Online:2023-09-20 Published:2023-09-22

摘要: 蓝绿景观是生态系统的重要组成部分,对保障生物多样性与生态安全具有重要意义。以我国南方典型水网型城市—南昌市为研究区,综合运用景观生态学模型和空间分析方法定量评估蓝绿景观格局及生境质量演化状况,并深入探究城市生境质量与蓝绿景观变化的时空响应关系。结果表明:(1)2005~2020年,蓝绿景观与耕地、建设用地间的转换频度与广度显著提升;生态屏障区蓝绿景观聚合度处于较高水平,中心城区的蓝绿景观持续收缩、破碎化程度加剧。(2)南昌市生境质量出现下降趋势并具有“外围高中间低”地域分异特征,高等级生境区主要分布在城市生态屏障区,中心城区的低等级生境区在研究期内出现跨江拓展、南向扩张和内部填充等演化特征。(3)蓝绿景观的景观格局对生境质量的影响具有空间异质性和方向性,景观聚合度(AI)与生境质量整体呈正相关,而边缘密度(ED)、散布与并列指数(IJI)和斑块密度(PD)对生境质量的正向影响主要集中在耕地和建设用地景观区域。该文认为蓝绿景观格局调控是促进生境质量提升的有效途径之一,在快速城镇化背景下水网型城市应合理布局中心城区蓝绿景观、强化生态屏障区蓝绿景观完整性保护、构建蓝绿景观交织的生态格局。研究结果为水网型城市生态安全保障、实现“水陆共生、韧性发展”格局提供科学参考。

Abstract: Blue-green landscape is an important part of ecosystem, which is of great significance to the protection of biodiversity and ecological security.This study selected Nanchang, a typical water network city in the south of China, as the study area. A combination of landscape ecology models and spatial analysis methods was adopted to quantitatively assess the evolution of blue-green landscape patterns and habitat quality. The spatio-temporal response relationship between urban habitat quality and blue-green landscape change was explored.Results show that: (1) The frequency and breadth of conversion between blue-green landscape and cultivated and construction lands increased significantly from 2005 to 2020. The aggregation degree of blue-green landscape in the ecological barrier area was at a high level, and the blue-green landscape in the central urban area continued to shrink and become fragmented. (2) Habitat quality in Nanchang declined from 2005 to 2020, and could be characterized by regional differentiation of “Peripheral high, middle low”. For the study period, the high-grade habitat areas were mainly distributed in the urban ecological barrier areas; The low-grade habitat areas in the central urban area demonstrated the characteristics of river-crossing expansion, southward expansion and internal filling. (3) The effects of landscape pattern of blue-green landscape on habitat quality were spatially heterogeneous and directional. Aggregation Index (AI) was positively correlated with habitat quality in general, but the positive effects of Edge Density (ED), Interspersion and Juxtaposition Index (IJI) and Patch Density (PD) on habitat quality were mainly concentrated in cultivated and construction lands. It is concluded that regulation of the blue-green landscape pattern is one of the effective ways to promote habitat quality. Under the background of rapid urbanization, the reasonable lay out of the blue-green landscape in central urban area should be put into practice in water network cities, aiming to strengthen the protection of the integrity of the blue-green landscape in the ecological barrier area, and construct the ecological pattern of the blue-green landscape. The results provide scientific reference for the ecological security of water network cities and the realization of the pattern of “water-land symbiosis, and resilient development”.


No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚琳, 沈竞, 温新龙, 高超. WRF模式参数化方案对江西山地风电场的风模拟研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1380 .
[2] 李向富, 刘目兴, 易军, 吴四平, 杨叶, 娄淑兰, . 峡山地不同垂直带土壤层的水文功能及其影响因子[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1809 .
[3] 孙惠惠, 章新平, 罗紫东, 尚程鹏, 贺新光, 饶志国.  近53 a来长江流域极端降水指数特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1879 .
[4] 童庆蒙 张露 张俊飚. 土地流转能否提升农民生活满意度?——来自湖北省江汉平原地区的经验证据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[5] 何松蔚, 王成刚, 姜海梅, 曹乐, 王新伟. 2015年冬季苏州城市热岛特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2078 .
[6] 方琳, 吴凤平, 王新华, 余燕团.  

基于共同前沿SBM模型的农业用水效率测度及改善潜力 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2293 -2304 .

[7] 孙传谆, 甄霖, 刘小玲, 刘通, 吴顺辉, 李景刚. 小尺度上蜜蜂传粉服务与耕地利用集约水平之间权衡关系研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 112 -121 .
[8] 李艳, 马百胜, 杨宣. 两类ENSO事件对中国东部地区极端降水的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 469 -482 .
[9] 李雪松, 龙湘雪, 齐晓旭. 长江经济带城市经济-社会-环境耦合协调发展的动态演化与分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(03): 505 -516 .
[10] 盛叶子, 曾蒙秀, 彭海军, 李 雪, 高 洋, 朱丽东, 李凤全, 胡忠行, 苏 婕, 余奕泓. 1470~1949年贵州地区干湿序列的重建及其影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(06): 1354 -1364 .