长江流域资源与环境 >> 2024, Vol. 33 >> Issue (3): 658-669.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202403018

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    

长江退捕渔民的生计风险与应对策略选择研究

庞洁1,陈洁1*,白珊珊2   

  1. (1.农业农村部农村经济研究中心,北京 100810; 2.河北大学经济学院,河北 保定 071002)
  • 出版日期:2024-03-20 发布日期:2024-04-03

 Livelihood Risk and Strategic Choice of Fishermen Retreated from the Yangtze River

PANG Jie1 ,CHEN Jie1,BAI Shan-shan2   

  1. (1.Research Center for Rural Economy,Ministry of Agricultural and Rural Affairs,Beijng 100810,China;2.School of Economics,Hebei University,Baoding 071002,China )
  • Online:2024-03-20 Published:2024-04-03

摘要: 退捕渔民的生计安置是长江十年禁渔能否顺利实施的关键所在,如何防范和避免生计转型中的致贫返贫倾向、实现退捕渔民的可持续发展具有重要现实意义。基于长江退捕渔民调查数据,通过建立生计风险指标体系,识别和评估长江流域不同区域和不同类型退捕渔民的生计风险,利用Binary Logistic模型分析长江退捕渔民生计风险对其应对策略选择的影响机制,以期为科学制定有效的生计风险防范体系提供支撑。研究表明:(1)长江地区渔民退捕后的生计模式以兼业型为主,收入来源主要是非农收入;(2)禁渔政策实施后,长江地区渔民的生计多样化指数呈整体下降趋势,普遍面临着较高的生计风险,生计风险多重性指数为8.5;(3)自然风险、金融风险和政策风险是渔民退捕后面临的最主要的三大风险,不同区域和不同类型退捕渔民的生计风险存在差异性;(4)外出打工和向亲朋借钱是退捕渔民应对风险最主要的策略选择,不同风险因素一定程度上会影响退捕渔民的应对策略。应进一步优化安置帮扶政策,提高政策的持续稳定性,建立多元化的补偿机制,筑牢退捕渔民的生计资本基础,降低其生计风险,确保实现退捕渔民“退得出、稳得住、能致富”。

Abstract: The livelihood placement of retreated fishermen is the key to the smooth implementation of the ten-year ban on fishing in the Yangtze River.How to prevent and avoid the tendency of poverty and return to poverty in the livelihood transformation and realize the sustainable development of retreated fishermen is of great practical significance.Based on the field survey data of fishermen in the Yangtze River basin,the livelihood risks of different areas and types of fishermen in the Yangtze River basin were identified and evaluated by establishing a livelihood risk index system.The Binary Logistic model was used to analyze the impact mechanism of livelihood risk on response strategy to providing support for formulating an effective livelihood risk prevention system and guarantee mechanism.The research showed that:(1) The livelihood mode of retreated fishermen in the Yangtze River area was mainly part-time,and the income source was mainly non-agricultural income; (2) After the implementation of the fishing ban policy,the livelihood diversification index of fishermen in the Yangtze River region showed an overall downward trend, facing higher livelihood risks, with a livelihood risk multiplicity index of 8.5; (3) Retreated fishermen were faced with multiple risk factors.Natural risk,ecological risk and policy risk were the three main risks.Differences existed for the livelihood risks of different areas and different types of fishermen.(4) Finding alternative work and borrowing money were the most important strategic choices for the fishermen to cope with risks.The follow-up assistance policy should further build the livelihood capital foundation of the retreated fishermen,reduce their livelihood risks,and ensure the realization of "retreat,stability and prosperity".

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 郭政, 董平, 陆玉麒, 黄群芳, 马颖忆. 长三角集装箱港口体系演化及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1340 .
[2] 伍文琪, 罗贤, 黄玮。李运刚. 云南省水资源承载力评价与时空分布特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1385 .
[3] 李向富, 刘目兴, 易军, 吴四平, 杨叶, 娄淑兰, . 峡山地不同垂直带土壤层的水文功能及其影响因子[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1809 .
[4] 庄汝龙, 宓科娜, 梁龙武. 中国工业废水排放格局及其驱动因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1765 .
[5] 李雪松 龙湘雪 齐晓旭. 长江经济带城市经济-社会-环境耦合协调发展的动态演化与分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[6] 唐恩斌, 张梅青.  

高铁背景下城市铁路可达性与空间相互作用格局——以江西省为例 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2241 -2249 .

[7] 顾铮鸣, 金晓斌, 沈春竹, 金志丰, 周寅康. 近15a江苏省水源涵养功能时空变化与影响因素探析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2453 -2462 .
[8] 田 鹏, 李加林, 史小丽, 王丽佳, 刘瑞清. 浙江省土地利用格局时空变化及生态风险评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2697 -2706 .
[9] 孙殿臣, 王慧敏, 黄 晶, 刘高峰, . 鄱阳湖流域城市洪涝灾害风险及土地类型调整策略研究 ——以景德镇市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2856 -2866 .
[10] 王 冰, 程 婷. 我国中部城市环境全要素生产率的时空演变——基于Malmquist-Luenberger生产率指数分解方法[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 48 -59 .