长江流域资源与环境 >> 2026, Vol. 35 >> Issue (1): 215-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202601017

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

水库消落带空间分异及其驱动因素——以四川省35座大型水库为例

万励1,2,鲍玉海1*,张浩哲1,2,杨洁1,2,贺秀斌1   

  1. (1.中国科学院水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所,四川 成都 610299; 2.中国科学院大学,北京 100049)

  • 出版日期:2026-01-20 发布日期:2026-01-20

Spatial Differentiation and Driving Factors of Reservoir Water Level Fluctuation Zones: A Case Study of 35 Large Reservoirs in Sichuan Province

WAN Li1,2,BAO Yu-hai1,ZHANG Hao-zhe1,2,YANG Jie1,2,HE Xiu-bin1   

  1. (1.Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Chengdu 610299,China;2.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China)
  • Online:2026-01-20 Published:2026-01-20

摘要: 水库消落带是陆地生态系统和水体生态系统交替作用区,明确消落带空间分布特征对库区生态环境保护和水库安全运行具有重要意义。以四川省35座大型水库消落带作为研究对象,对消落带在地形上的梯度分布、5 km缓冲区内消落带空间分异的驱动因素进行分析,并且依次增大缓冲区范围探究其解释力q的变化。结果表明:(1)水位波动范围在低海拔、低坡度地区的消落带,主要在低梯度的区域出露;而对于高海拔、高坡度的区域,水库消落带梯度分布则较为均匀。(2)围绕消落带5 km缓冲区,利用最优参数地理探测器,发现影响消落带空间分异的驱动因素主要为地貌、年蒸发量和年均温度。(3)将缓冲区按5 km梯度依次扩大发现大部分因子的解释力q呈现下降趋势,表明其对消落带的影响存在距离上的依赖性。研究结果可为区域水库消落带生态修复、水库的运行管理等政策的制定提供数据支撑和理论依据。

Abstract: The water level fluctuation zone of reservoirs represents a transitional area between terrestrial and aquatic ecosystem. Clearly defining the spatial distribution characteristics of this fluctuation zone is crucial for both the protection of ecological environments and ensuring the safe operation of reservoirs. In this study, 35 large reservoirs in Sichuan Province were selected as the research objects. The gradient distribution of the landforms and the corresponding driving factors were explored within the 5-km buffer zone. Additionally, the change in explanatory power (q) was explored by progressively expanding the buffer zone range. The results indicated that: (1) The water level fluctuation range in low-slope area was primarily concentrated in the regions with a low altitude, whereas in the high-altitude and high-slope areas, the gradient distribution of water level fluctuation zone tended to be more uniform. (2) Within the 5-km buffer zone surrounding the water level fluctuation zone, the optimal parameter geographic detector was employed. It was revealed that the primary driving factors were geomorphology, annual evaporation and annual average temperature. (3) The explanatory power (q) of most factors exhibited a decreasing trend as the buffer zone was progressively expanded by 5 km increments, which indicated that the influence of the buffer zone on the fluctuation zone was distance-dependent. This study provided valuable data support and a theoretical foundation for the formulation of policies on ecological restoration and operational management of regional reservoir water level fluctuating zones.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!