长江流域资源与环境 >> 2013, Vol. 22 >> Issue (03): 337-.

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

天沙河沉积物中重金属污染特征与生态风险评价

赵慧敏| 高凌颜| 刘敏超   

  1. (五邑大学化学与环境工程学院|广东 江门 529020)
  • 出版日期:2013-03-20

POLLUTION OF HEAVY METALS IN THE SEDIMENTS FROM RIVER AND ITS POTENTIAL ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT——FOCUS ON THE TIANSHA RIVER OF THE PEARL RIVER DELTA REGION

ZHAO Huimin, GAO Lingyan, LIU Minchao   

  1. (School of Chemical and Environmental Egineering, Wuyi University, Jiangmen 529020, China)
  • Online:2013-03-20

摘要:

采集天沙河表层沉积物,检测其中Cr、Ni、Cu、Zn、Cd和Pb 6种重金属的含量,分别采用内梅罗指数法(NI)、地累积指数法、Hakanson生态风险指数法和淡水生态系统沉积物基准法(SQGs)对沉积物中重金属污染的特征和生态风险进行评价,并对几种评价方法进行比较。结果表明:鉴于各采样点重金属的污染特征,采用内梅罗指数法和Hakanson生态风险指数法所得结果一致,杜阮河段、白沙河段及天沙河上游污染较严重,天沙河中下游污染程度相对较低;就各重金属的污染特征而言,采用地累积指数法和Hakanson生态风险指数法所得结果基本一致,Cd和Cu污染较严重,其次是Zn、Ni、Pb、Cr;而采用SQGs法的风险评价与其它方法所得结果存在一定差异,其主要原因是SQGs法基于污染物的生物毒性效应,而其他方法多反映单一重金属污染效应或多种重金属综合污染效应

Abstract:

The surface sediments from the Tiansha River were sampled and the contents of six heavy metals including Cr,Ni,Cu,Zn,Cd and Pb were measured.The pollution characteristics and ecological risk of heavy metals sediments containing were respectively evaluated by means of Nemerow index,geoaccumulation index,Hakanson’s ecological risk index and Sediment Quality Guidelines (SQGs) for freshwater ecosystem.Meanwhile,the comparison of the evaluation methodology was fulfilled.The results showed that the characteristics of heavy metal pollution evaluated by Nemerow index and Hakanson’s ecological risk index reached agreement to each sampling site.The pollution of Duruan,Baisha River basin and the upper reaches of the Tiansha River was more serious than that of the middle and down reaches of the Tiansha River.Besides, the evaluation on pollution risk of each heavy metal acquired general consistence by geoaccumulation index and Hakanson’s ecological risk index.Cd and Cu possessed the highest risks,followed by Zn,Ni,Pb,Cr.The consequences deduced by SQGs assessment showed slight differences compared with other approaches,mainly because SQGs index was more susceptible to biotoxicity,and other methods focused on pollution effect of single heavy metal or comprehensive pollution effect of various heavy metal

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 娜,许有鹏, 陈 爽. 苏州城市化进程对降雨特征影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 335 -339 .
[2] 张 强.
近40年来长江流域水沙变化趋势及可能影响因素探讨
[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 257 .
[3] 孙维侠, 赵永存, 黄 标, 廖菁菁, 王志刚, 王洪杰. 长三角典型地区土壤环境中Se的空间变异特征及其与人类健康的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 113 .
[4] 袁旭音. 污染河道的常量和微量元素特征及指示意义[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 270 .
[5] 张其成,姚亦锋,蒋成煜. 南京城市滨江带功能演变及现代景观规划研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 30 -34 .
[6] 胡鸿兴,康洪莉,贡国鸿,朱觅辉5,郑文勤5,吴法清,何定富,李振文,耿 栋5. 湖北省湿地冬季水鸟多样性研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 422 -428 .
[7] 时连强,李九发,应 铭,左书华,徐海根. 长江口没冒沙演变过程及其对水库工程的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 458 -464 .
[8] 吴之坤, 张长芹,黄 媛,张敬丽,孙宝玲,. 长江上游玉龙雪山植物物种多样性形成的探讨[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 48 -53 .
[9] 刘盛和. 中国城市化水平省际差异的成因探析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(6): 530 -535 .
[10] 张代钧,许丹宇,任宏洋,曹海彬,郑 敏,刘惠强. 长江三峡水库水污染控制若干问题[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 605 -610 .