长江流域资源与环境 >> 2013, Vol. 22 >> Issue (06): 817-.

• 自然灾害 • 上一篇    

基于MODIS的雅鲁藏布江流域干旱动态监测及对植被胁迫作用的研究

郭 兵 |陶和平 |姜 琳 |孔 博 |刘斌涛 |史 展 |宋春风   

  1. (1.中国科学院/水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所|四川 成都 610041;2.中国科学院大学|北京 100049; 3. 成都信息工程学院|四川 成都 610225 
  • 出版日期:2013-06-20

RESEARCH ON DYNAMIC MONITORING OF DROUGHT AND THE IMPACT ON VEGETATION IN THE BRAHMAPUTRA RIVER BASIN BASED ON MODIS

GUO Bing1,2,TAO Heping1,JIANG Lin3 ,KONG Bo1,LIU Bintao1,SHI Zhan1,2|SONG Chunfeng1,2   

  1. (1.Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences|Chengdu 610041|China|2.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;3. Chengdu University of Information Technology,Chengdu 610225,China
  • Online:2013-06-20

摘要:

基于MODIS数据利用垂直干旱指数模型和重心模型分析了2011年4月~2012年4月的雅鲁藏布江流域干旱动态变化,并就干旱对植被的胁迫作用做了进一步探讨。研究发现:(1)干旱强度减弱区主要分布于雅鲁藏布江流域的中部,而干旱强度增强区则主要集中于该流域的上游及下游地区;(2)2012年4月份雅鲁藏布江流域的总体干旱强度相比2011年4月有所加重,轻度干旱、重度干旱区均有所增长,而湿润区则有一定减小。干旱强度加重较大的区域主要分布于拉萨河流域及>3 000~4 000 m、>4 000~5 000 m高度带;(3)雅鲁藏布江流域的NDVI与PDI的重心迁移具有很好的负相关性,说明其干旱动态变化对植被具有较明显的胁迫作用

Abstract:

Based on MODIS,the study analyzes the dynamic change of drought intensity between April 2011 and April 2012 with the models of gravity center and the perpendicular drought index in the Brahmaputra river basin,then it takes a further explore of impact on the vegetation.The results show as follows.(1)The region of weakened drought intensity was mainly located in the middle reaches of the Brahmaputra River which included Shigatse City,Jiangzi County,Qushui County,Renbu county and Zhanang county, while zone of the aggravated drought intensity was mainly concentrated in the upstream and downstream of the Brahmaputra River such as Lunggar county,Zhongba county and Cuole county.(2) On the whole,the intensity of the drought in April 2012 had been aggravated than that in April 2011 in the Brahmaputra River Basin.Areas of mild drought,severe drought increased,however the areas of wet reduced.The regions of severely aggravated drought intensity were mainly distributed in the Lhasa River Basin and the belts of >3 000~4 000 m and >4 000~5 000 m such as Naqu county,Linzhou county and Mozhugongka county.(3) The transfer trajectory of gravity center indicated that:NDVI and PDI had a good negative correlation,thus the vegetation was apparently under the stress of the drought.Of all the vegetation types in the Brahmaputra River Basin,the subalpline sclerophyllous coniferous forest,sparse forest of high mountain,subtropical and tropical coniferous forest of mountain were the most sensitve to the PDI,however the types of alpine sparse vegetation,corps which harvest once each year,subalpine deciduous broadleaved forest were insensitive to it

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 许峰, 祁士华, 高媛, 邢新丽. 绵阳市代表性点位土壤多环芳烃剖面分布特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(2): 192 .
[2] 王云琦,王玉杰,朱金兆. 重庆缙云山典型林分林地土壤抗蚀性分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 775 -780 .
[3] 王里奥,黄 川,詹艳慧,袁 辉. 三峡库区消落带淹水—落干过程土壤磷吸附—解吸及释放研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(5): 593 -597 .
[4] 何小勤, 戴雪荣, 顾成军. 崇明东滩不同部位的季节性沉积研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(2): 157 .
[5] 施建刚, 裘丽岚. 成都平原城市群的城市流分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(9): 796 .
[6] 田忠志, 邢友华, 姜瑞雪, 高雁. 东平湖表层沉积物中磷的形态分布特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(06): 724 .
[7] 刘春霞, 李月臣, 杨华. 三峡库区(重庆段)石漠化敏感性评价及空间分异特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(3): 291 .
[8] 傅春 |康晚英. 环鄱阳湖区农业面源污染TN/TP时空变化与分布特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(07): 864 .
[9] 曹志宏 |陈志超 |郝晋珉. 中国城乡居民食品消费变化趋势分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(10): 1173 .
[10] 周 华 |周生路 |金平华. 江苏省种粮补贴区域差异化理论与实证研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(11): 1342 .