长江流域资源与环境 >> 2014, Vol. 23 >> Issue (11): 1566-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201411012

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

杭州地区大中型水库富营养化状况及影响因子分析

盛海燕,韩轶才,虞左明,刘明亮,何剑波,张银龙   

  1. (1.南京林业大学生物与环境学院,江苏 南京 210037; 2.杭州市环境保护科学研究院,浙江 杭州 310014)
  • 出版日期:2014-11-20

EUTROPHIC STATES AND INFLUENCE FACTORS OF LARGE AND MEDIUMSCALED RESERVOIR IN HANGZHOU AREA

SHENG Haiyan1,2, HAN Yicai2, YU Zuoming2, LIU Mingliang2, HE Jianbo2, ZHANG Yinlong1   

  1. (1.College of Biology and the Environment Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China; 2.Hangzhou Institute of Environmental Protection Science, Hangzhou 310014, China
  • Online:2014-11-20

摘要:

在2008年和2009年对杭州地区17个大中型水库进行了调查。结果表明:杭州地区大中型水库水质不容乐观,按照单因子指标评价法,只有3个水库符合Ⅱ类水体标准,2个水库符合Ⅲ类水体标准,2个水库为Ⅳ类水体,3个水库为Ⅴ类水体,其余7个水库均为劣Ⅴ类水体,定类指标均是总氮。根据综合营养状态指数结果:丰水期2个水库处于贫营养状态,13个水库处于中营养状态,2个水库处于轻度富营养状态;枯水期16个水库处于中营养状态,1个水库处于中度富营养状态。总氮和总磷作为营养物质是这些水库富营养化的主要影响因素。位于山区源头地区的水库水质最好,位于平原城乡附近的水库其次,位于城市下游及城区附近的水库水质最差

Abstract:

In order to understand the water environment of reservoirs, an investigation was conducted on the water quality in 17 large and mediumscale reservoirs of Hangzhou City, China. The results showed that the water quality of those reservoirs were not optimistic. According to a single factor index, the water qualities of three reservoirs met Grade Ⅱ water standards, two reservoirs met Grade Ⅲ, two reservoirs met Grade Ⅳ, three reservoirs met Grade Ⅴ and seven reservoirs were worse than Grade Ⅴ. The specific index determining the classes was total nitrogen in all cases. According to trophic state index, in the wet season two reservoirs were oligotrophic, thirteen reservoirs were in mesotrophication and two reservoirs were light eutrophication; in the dry season sixteen reservoirs were in mesotrophication and one reservoirs was in moderate eutrophication. Total nitrogen and total phosphorus were the main factors affecting eutrophication. The results of cluster analysis showed that the seventeen reservoirs were divided into three categories. Qinshan and Fuchunjiang reservoirs were identified as a class for the bad water quality; Tongshan, Xiayuan, Fengshuling and Yanjia reservoirs located in the upstream region of Xinan River and Xinanjiang reservoir were identified as the second class for the good water quality; the remaining ten reservoirs were identified as the third class. The reservoirs located in mountainous region had the best water quality, reservoirs near the town followed and reservoirs located near the city and downstream city had bad water quality. Different regions and different types of reservoirs had different pollution reasons. For different reasons we should implement corresponding countermeasures to prevent and control reservoir pollution

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 娜,许有鹏, 陈 爽. 苏州城市化进程对降雨特征影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 335 -339 .
[2] 孙维侠, 赵永存, 黄 标, 廖菁菁, 王志刚, 王洪杰. 长三角典型地区土壤环境中Se的空间变异特征及其与人类健康的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 113 .
[3] 胡大伟,卞新民,许 泉. 基于ANN的土壤重金属分布和污染评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 475 -479 .
[4] 张洁| 张志斌| 孙欣欣. 云南省矿产资源开发利用中的主要环境问题[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 61 -65 .
[5] 时连强,李九发,应 铭,左书华,徐海根. 长江口没冒沙演变过程及其对水库工程的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 458 -464 .
[6] 邹小兵,曾 婷,TRINA MACKIE,肖尚友,夏之宁. 嘉陵江下游江段春季浮游藻类特征及污染现状[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 612 .
[7] 张代钧,许丹宇,任宏洋,曹海彬,郑 敏,刘惠强. 长江三峡水库水污染控制若干问题[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 605 -610 .
[8] 黄 峰 魏 浪 李 磊 朱 伟. 乌江干流中上游水电梯级开发水温累积效应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(4): 337 .
[9] 胡鸿兴, 张岩岩, 何伟, 田蓉, 钟鑫, 韩世松, 李思思, 王俊杰陈文方, 杨阳, 陈侈, 邓晗, 文英, 崔雅婷, 李茜,  王璇, 彭菁菁, 高鑫, 唐义. 神农架大九湖泥炭藓沼泽湿地对镉(Ⅱ)、铜(Ⅱ)、铅(Ⅱ)、锌(Ⅱ)的净化模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(11): 1050 .
[10] 王肇磊, 贺新枝. 晚清时期湖北自然灾害的治理及其经验教训[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(11): 1080 .