长江流域资源与环境 >> 2015, Vol. 24 >> Issue (02): 194-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201502003

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

快速交通对区域中心城市日常可达性影响——以长江三角洲地区为例

张超亚, 张小林, 李红波   

  1. (南京师范大学地理科学学院,江苏 南京 210023)
  • 出版日期:2015-02-20

INFLUENCE OF RAPID TRANSIT ON DAILY ACCESSIBILITY OF REGIONAL CENTER CITIES

ZHANG Chaoya, ZHANG Xiaolin, LI Hongbo   

  1. (College of Geographical Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China)
  • Online:2015-02-20

摘要:

近年来高速公路、高速铁路等快速交通不断发展,城市区域可达性得到大幅提高。基于栅格数据的成本加权距离法,利用平均旅行时间、等时圈以及日常可达性等区域可达性指标,比较分析有无高速公路和有无高速铁路情况下长三角地区中心城市可达性空间格局变化,探索两种快速交通方式对中心城市可达性的影响差异。结果显示:由于高速公路网发育程度较好,对城市区域可达性的影响较为均衡,而高速公路桥能显著缩短两岸旅行时间;高速铁路运行速度更快,但主要沿大城市带呈线状分布,因此对沿线可达性改善明显,尤其是对铁路端点城市;高速铁路较高速公路对城市之间日常可达时间优化效果显著;高速公路和高速铁路对于可达性影响各异,需衔接配合方能大幅提高城市日常可达性,促进区域经济社会公平快速发展

Abstract:

In the Rapid Transit age, transportation accessibility has becoming one of the most significant factors of economic development. With the development of rapid transit, such as the highway and highspeed railway, accessibility of urban area is increasing sharply. Based on GIS and the methods of cost weighted raster analysis, this paper is conducted with regional accessibility indicators like average time, urban isochronous rings and daily accessibility to compare the accessibility spatial pattern changes of the central cities in Yangtze River delta with and without highway, with and without highspeed railways. Its purpose is to explore two types of rapid transit impact on central city accessibility. The result shows as follows. Firstly, highway network is perfectin Yangtze River delta, so the influence of the highway on city accessibility is relatively balanced, shortening the time between 30%-40%. Highway Bridges connecting both sides of the Yangtze River and Hangzhou Bay can significantly shorten the travel time of both sides, where the time variable ratio is high. Highspeed railway network is mainly along the megalopolis of the Yangtze River delta, so the changes of spatial distribution of the time variable ratio are unbalanced and accessibility improvement of the area along highspeed railway is apparent. The influence of the highspeed railway on the accessibility of cities which are along particularly the endpoint city like Nanjing and Ningbo, is more obvious than that of the cities like Nantong away from highspeed. Secondly, under the influence of highway, the expansion of isochronous rings is remarkable. Highspeed railway makes the isochronous rings stretched along the highspeed railway. Highspeed railway can better expand accessible area than railway within 1 hour. However, as a hub, the stops of highspeed railway are fewer. Only by upgrading other rapid transportation to enlarge the service range of stops, can it substantially expand communication circle of one day, reduce differences in external transportation between cities and areas around cities and promote the fairness of the social and economic development in Yangtze River delta. Thirdly, highway and highspeed railway can significantly optimize the daily accessibility between cities and speed up the formation of the regional division of the Yangtze River delta. The effect of the highspeed railway is significantly greater than the highway with 1 hour, but it tends to equilibrium within 3 hours, which is mainly due to the regional limitations of the Yangtze River delta. Highway can shorten total time of each city to other cities by more than 15 hours averagely, highspeed railway by more than 26 hours. Therefore, highspeed railway can better improve daily accessibility between central cities than highway. Lastly, although the benefits of Nantongs accessibility from the highspeed railway is small, in the future the electrification transformation of railway from Nanjing to Nantong will be completed, the time between two cities is shortened from 4 hours to less than 2 hours. When all the cities open the highspeed railway, the daily accessibility of all regional center cities in Yangtze River delta will be further optimized

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 宋玉芝,秦伯强, 高光. 附着生物对富营养化水体氮磷的去除效果[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(2): 180 .
[2] 刘滨谊,刘 琴. 服务于城市旅游形象的景观规划——以南京市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 164 -168 .
[3] 梁常德,龙天渝,李继承,刘腊美. 三峡库区非点源氮磷负荷研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(1): 26 -30 .
[4] 吴丰林,周德民,胡金明. 基于景观格局演变的城市湿地景观生态规划途径[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 368 .
[5] 屈 璠,刘 敏,侯立军,许世远,刘巧梅,欧冬妮. 潮汐循环影响下上覆水环境因子和氮营养盐的变化及其相关关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 345 .
[6] 马育军, 黄贤金, 肖思思, 王 舒. 基于DEA模型的区域生态环境建设绩效评价——以江苏省苏州市为例 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 769 .
[7] 一之濑俊明 大坪国顺 景元书. 依据经济水平建立的华中—华南粮食运输模型[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(3): 217 -221 .
[8] 刘小丽, 沈 芳, 朱伟健, 刘 曦. MERIS卫星数据定量反演长江河口的悬沙浓度[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(11): 1026 .
[9] 刘扬扬, 张行南, 徐双全, 倪斐. 长江口滩涂地形冲淤分析研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(11): 1314 .
[10] 赵 爽| 王慧敏| 仇 蕾. 工业水环境监管契约研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(10): 1279 .