长江流域资源与环境 >> 2016, Vol. 25 >> Issue (08): 1247-1255.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201608011

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

海岛旅游绿色发展生态补偿标准研究——以浙江舟山普陀旅游金三角为例

肖建红, 王敏, 于庆东, 刘娟, 张志刚   

  1. 青岛大学商学院, 山东 青岛 266071
  • 收稿日期:2015-11-23 修回日期:2016-03-19 出版日期:2016-08-20
  • 作者简介:肖建红(1979~),男,教授,博士,主要研究方向为资源与环境经济.E-mail:xiaojian_hong@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41301622);山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2013GQ005);山东省社会科学规划项目(13DJJJ03);山东省高等学校社会科学研究项目(J12WG03)

STUDY ON THE ECOLOGICAL COMPENSATION STANDARDS OF GREEN DEVELOPMENT OF ISLAND TOURISM——A CASE STUDY OF PUTUO GOLDEN TRIANGLE IN ZHOUSHAN ISLANDS

XIAO Jian-hong, WANG Min, YU Qing-dong, LIU Juan, ZHANG Zhi-gang   

  1. Business College, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China
  • Received:2015-11-23 Revised:2016-03-19 Online:2016-08-20
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China (41301622);Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China (ZR2013GQ005);Social Science Planning Project of Shandong Province, China (13DJJJ03);Social Science Research Project of Shandong Provincial Education Department, China (J12WG03)

摘要: 绿色发展是强调人与自然平等、人与自然和谐发展的新可持续发展观。海岛旅游绿色发展有利于保护旅游目的地的海洋生态系统与森林生态系统健康和减少旅游业对资源与环境的压力。运用海洋渔业生态标签制度(MFELS)、生态系统服务付费(PES)和市场替换法(MRM),对海岛旅游绿色发展生态补偿问题进行了研究,其中,旅游碳排放增量生态补偿(增汇或碳汇)主要依据是污染者付费原则、环境友好型海产品生态补偿主要依据是保护者得到补偿原则、生态系统服务付费主要依据是受益者付费原则;并以舟山普陀旅游金三角为案例地,以问卷调查和访谈调查获取的数据为基础,以2013年为评价基准年份,对海岛旅游绿色发展的生态补偿标准进行了评估。结果表明:海岛旅游绿色发展可获得6.53×108元的生态补偿资金,游客平均承担110.43元/人次的生态补偿标准。

关键词: 海岛旅游, 绿色发展, 生态补偿, 普陀旅游金三角

Abstract: Green development is a new sustainable development concept, which emphasizes the equal and harmonious development between human and nature. The green development of island tourism is benefit to keep ocean and forest ecosystems healthy, reduce pressure on resource and environment from tourism. We studied the ecological compensation on green development of island tourism through marine fisheries' eco-label schemes, payments for ecosystem services and market-replacement methods. The ecological compensation of the tourism carbon increment emissions depended on the polluter pays principle, and the environmentally friendly seafood was mainly on basis of the principle of protector getting compensation. Meanwhile, the ecological compensation of the payments for ecosystem services was mainly on the basis of the beneficiary pays principle. Specifically, according to the data from questionnaire and interview in Putuo Golden Triangle, Zhoushan City, we evaluated the ecological compensation standards of green development of island tourism in the base year of 2013. The results were as follows. The green development of island tourism could obtain 6.53×108 RMB as the ecological compensation funds. The tourists should undertake 110.43 RMB per person-time.

Key words: island tourism, green development, ecological compensation, Putuo Golden Triangle

中图分类号: 

  • X22
[1] COSTANZA R, D'ARGE R, DE GROOT R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387(6630): 253-260.
[2] 肖建红, 王敏, 于庆东, 等. 海岛型旅游目的地生态补偿标准方法体系的构建与应用[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(2): 448-462.[XIAO J H, WANG M, YU Q D, et al. Research on ecological compensation standards for island tourist destinations: the construction and application of methodology[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(2): 448-462..]
[3] TACCONI L. Redefining payments for environmental services[J]. Ecological Economics, 2012, 73: 29-36.
[4] WUNDER S. Revisiting the concept of payments for environmental services[J]. Ecological Economics, 2015, 117: 234-243.
[5] MAHANTY S, SUICH H, TACCONI L. Access and benefits in payments for environmental services and implications for REDD+: lessons from seven PES schemes[J]. Land Use Policy, 2013, 31: 38-47.
[6] GARCÍA-AMADO L R, RUIZ PÉREZ M, BARRASA GARCÍA S. Motivation for conservation: assessing integrated conservation and development projects and payments for environmental services in La Sepultura Biosphere Reserve, Chiapas, Mexico[J]. Ecological Economics, 2013, 89: 92-100.
[7] FAUZI A, ANNA Z. The complexity of the institution of payment for environmental services: a case study of two Indonesian PES schemes[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2013, 6: 54-63.
[8] 王敏, 肖建红, 于庆东, 等. 水库大坝建设生态补偿标准研究-以三峡工程为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(1): 37-49.[WANG M, XIAO J H, YU Q D, et al. Research of eco-compensation standard of reservoir dam construction: a case of the Three Gorges Project[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(1): 37-39..]
[9] 刘灵芝, 范俊楠. 构建森林生态补偿市场化激励机制的探讨-以神龙架林区为例[J]. 林业经济问题, 2014, 34(6): 544-547, 552.[LIU L Z, FAN J N. Research on building of forest eco-compensation of market-oriented incentives: taking Shenlongjia forests as an example[J]. Issues of Forestry Economics, 2014, 34(6): 544-547, 552..]
[10] 李子玥, 王辉, 霍璐阳, 等. 松花江流域湿地保护生态补偿机制研究[J]. 湿地科学, 2015, 13(2): 202-206.[LI Z Y, WANG H, HUO L Y, et al. Mechanism of ecological compensation of wetland protection in Songhua River Basin[J]. Wetland Science, 2015, 13(2): 202-206..]
[11] 王干, 白明旭. 中国矿区生态补偿资金来源机制和对策探讨[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2015, 25(5): 75-82.[WANG G, BAI M X. Ecological compensation fund source mechanism in mining area of China and countermeasures[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2015, 25(5): 75-82..]
[12] 余亮亮, 蔡银莺. 基于农户受偿意愿的农田生态补偿-以湖北省京山县为例[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(1): 215-223.[YU L L, CAI Y Y. Ecological compensation based on farmers' willingness: a case study of Jingshan County in Hubei Province, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26(1): 215-223..]
[13] 李玉新, 魏同洋, 靳乐山. 牧民对草原生态补偿政策评价及其影响因素研究-以内蒙古四子王旗为例[J]. 资源科学, 2014, 36(11): 2442-2450.[LI Y X, WEI T Y, JIN L S. Herdspeople attitudes towards grassland eco-compensation policies in Siziwang Banner, Inner Mongolia[J]. Resources Science, 2014, 36(11): 2442-2450..]
[14] 蒋依依. 旅游地生态补偿空间选择研究-以云南省玉龙县为例[J]. 旅游学刊, 2014, 29(11): 95-103.[JIANG Y Y. Spatial selection research of tourism ecological compensation: a case study of Yulong County, Yunnan Province[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2014, 29(11): 95-103..]
[15] 李晓西, 刘一萌, 宋涛. 人类绿色发展指数的测算[J]. 中国社会科学, 2014(6): 69-95.[LI X X, LIU Y M, SONG T. Calculation of the green development index[J]. Social Sciences in China, 2014(6): 69-95..]
[16] 刘纪远, 邓祥征, 刘卫东, 等. 中国西部绿色发展概念框架[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2013, 23(10): 1-7.[LIU J Y, DENG X Z, LIU W D, et al. Conceptual framework of green development in Western China[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2013, 23(10): 1-7..]
[17] 胡鞍钢, 周绍杰. 绿色发展: 功能界定、机制分析与发展战略[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2014, 24(1): 14-20.[HU A G, ZHOU S J. Green development: functional definition, mechanism analysis and development strategy[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2014, 24(1): 14-20..]
[18] 李文华, 刘某承. 关于中国生态补偿机制建设的几点思考[J]. 资源科学, 2010, 32(5): 791-796.[LI W H, LIU M C. Several strategic thought on China's eco-compensation mechanism[J]. Resources Science, 2010, 32(5): 791-796..]
[19] GÖSSLING S, PEETERS P, CERON J P, et al. The eco-efficiency of tourism[J]. Ecological Economics, 2005, 54(4): 417-434.
[20] 肖建红, 于爱芬, 王敏. 旅游过程碳足迹评估-以舟山群岛为例[J]. 旅游科学, 2011, 25(4): 58-66.[XIAO J H, YU A F, WANG M. Carbon footprint evaluation in tours: a case study of Zhoushan islands[J]. Tourism Science, 2011, 25(4): 58-66..]
[21] 浙江省旅游局. 浙江省旅游统计月报[EB/OL]. 2013-11. http://www.tourzj.gov.cn/.[Zhejiang Provincial Tourism Bureau. Zhejiang monthly statistical indicators[EB/OL]. 2013-11. http://www.tourzj.gov.cn/.]
[22] 章锦河, 张捷. 旅游生态足迹模型及黄山市实证分析[J]. 地理学报, 2004, 59(5): 763-771.[ZHANG J H, ZHANG J. Touristic ecological footprint model and analysis of Huangshan City in 2002[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2004, 59(5): 763-771..]
[23] IPCC. IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories (volume 2: energy)[R]. IPCC, 2006.
[24] 汪运波, 肖建红. 基于生态足迹成分法的海岛型旅游目的地生态补偿标准研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2014, 24(8): 149-155.[WANG Y B, XIAO J H. Research on ecological compensation standard of island tourist destination based on component method of ecological footprint[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2014, 24(8): 149-155..]
[25] 国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴2014[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2014.[National Bureau of Statistics of China. China statistical yearbook: 2014[Z]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2014..]
[1] 冯 畅, 毛德华, 周 慧, 曹艳敏, 胡光伟. 流域绿水管理博弈建模及应用分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2505-2517.
[2] 杨欣, 蔡银莺, 张安录. 农田生态补偿横向财政转移支付额度研究——基于选择实验法的生态外溢视角[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(03): 368-375.
[3] 胡小飞, 傅春, 陈伏生, 杨丽. 基于水足迹的区域生态补偿标准及时空格局研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(09): 1430-1437.
[4] 卢新海, 柯善淦. 基于生态足迹模型的区域水资源生态补偿量化模型构建——以长江流域为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(02): 334-341.
[5] 王飞儿 徐向阳 方志发 俞洁. 基于COD通量的钱塘江流域水污染生态补偿量化研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(3): 259-263.
[6] 许月卿,蔡运龙. 土壤侵蚀经济损失分析及价值估算——以贵州省猫跳河流域为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 470-474.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 徐宪立,张科利,孔亚平,陈济丁. 重庆市骨架公路网规划生态环境影响评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 107 -111 .
[2] 陈亚华,黄少华,刘胜环,王桂萍,丁 锋,邵志成,沈振国. 南京地区农田土壤和蔬菜重金属污染状况研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 356 -360 .
[3] 聂 坚, 白永平, 孙 克, 王世金. “红三角”地区城镇体系结构分形研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(5): 673 .
[4] 王 初, 陈振楼, 王 京, 周乃晟, 许世远. 上海市崇明岛公路两侧土壤重金属污染研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 105 .
[5] 张美玲,梁 虹,祝 安. 贵州省水资源承载力的空间地域差异[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 68 .
[6] 班军梅,缪启龙,李 雄. 西南地区近50年来气温变化特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 346 -351 .
[7] 董方勇, 胡传林, 黄道明. 三峡水库水质保护与渔业利用关系探讨[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 93 -96 .
[8] 毕东苏, 郑广宏, 顾国维, 郭小品. 城市生态系统承载理论探索与实证——以长江三角洲为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 465 -469 .
[9] 王琳莉,陈 星. 一种新的汛期降水集中期划分方法[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 352 -355 .
[10] 敖荣军,. 中国地区经济差距及其演化的产业变动因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 420 .