长江流域资源与环境 >> 2017, Vol. 26 >> Issue (01): 82-90.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201701010

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

洋山海域工程前后水动力特征分析

杨忠勇1, 石小涛1, 吴泽艳1, 郭兴杰2, 张勇3   

  1. 1. 三峡大学水利与环境学院, 湖北 宜昌 443002;
    2. 上海市地质调查研究院, 上海 200072;
    3. 长江三峡通航管理局, 湖北 宜昌 443000
  • 收稿日期:2016-04-29 修回日期:2016-07-12 出版日期:2017-01-20
  • 作者简介:杨忠勇(1984~),男,博士,讲师,主要从事港口航道水沙输运规律方面研究.E-mail:ayong0710@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41506103);三峡大学博士人才启动基金(KJ2014B032)

ANALYSIS OF HYDRODYNAMICS IN YANGSHAN SEA BEFORE AND AFTER THE PROJECT

YANG Zhong-yong1, SHI Xiao-tao1, WU Ze-yan1, GUO Xin-jie2, ZHANG Yong3   

  1. 1. College of Hydraulic and Environment Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China;
    2. Shanghai Institute of Geological Survey, 930 Lingshi Rd., Shanghai 200072, China;
    3. Three Gorges Navigation Authority, Yichang 443000, China
  • Received:2016-04-29 Revised:2016-07-12 Online:2017-01-20
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China (41506103);Talent Foundation of China Three Gorges University (KJ2014B032)

摘要: 洋山海域自2002年建港工程以来,先后封堵了北岛链三个过水汊道,使得海域附近水动力结构发生显著变化。采用工程前后大量水动力实测资料,并结合数值计算结果,对洋山海域工程前后的水动力特征进行了综合分析。研究结果表明:工程后大部分海域涨潮流速降低,但小洋山前沿除外;整个海域落潮流速度增加,但地形急剧缩窄的东口门区域增幅并不显著。讨论认为,地转偏向力显著增强了海域北部区域特别是小洋山前沿海域的涨潮流速,是小洋山岛屿前沿海域涨潮流速工程后维持不变的重要原因;受南岛链不规则岸线的影响,地转偏向力对落潮流影响不显著。工程后各汊道的封堵使得落潮流外泄不畅而发生壅水,使得工程后涨潮时段海域水位低于工程前,没有壅水现象发生。工程后的涨、落憩流时段均形成了较大范围、较长时段的弱流场。

关键词: 洋山港, 水动力, 地转偏向力, 壅水, 憩流弱流

Abstract: Started from October, 2002, the project of Yangshan Harbor is based on the Northern island chain by closing three main fork channels. Hydrodynamics are influenced significantly in this sea area due to this large-scale project. The observation data from several ADCP transects during October, 2002 and October, 2008 indicated that, the speed of tidal current during flood period decreased in the whole sea except near the Xiaoyangshan Island. The speed of tidal current during ebb period increased in the whole sea, but the variation range of velocity is not as significantly as that of topography changing in the eastern Yangshan Sea. To study these hydrodynamic phenomena and their variation characteristics before and after the project, five ADCP transects with seven measurements of current data in the sea were collected. In addition, a numerical model developed from FVCOM (Finite Volume Coastal Ocean Model) was applied in this sea to reproduce the situations before the project. Our results suggest that, the decrease of tidal current during flood period was mainly resulted from the decrease in flood tidal volume after the fork-closure project. However, the western flood current near the Xiaoyangshan Island was deflected to northward on the effect Coriolis force, thus the flood current near that island showed a slight increase after the project. Furthermore, the numerical experiment indicated that, the Coriolis force exerted little influence on the ebb currents, probably due to the irregular island lines on the south island chain. Since the outlet over the eastern sea dramatic converged after the project, the ebb current increased. However, the convergence of the eastern outlet also induced an occurrence of dammed water, causing a relative small increasing range of ebb velocity after the project. It should be noted that, the water level would rise up in the area near the Xiaoyangshan Island, mainly caused by the encounter of two strong flood currents. During flood period, the water level in the whole sea area after project was lower than that before project, indicating that there is no dam water occurred. Mainly caused by the tide wave reflection due to the northern straight landline, a relative longer period and larger scale of weak current field occurred after the project.

Key words: Yangshan deep water Harbor, hydrodynamics, coriolis force, dammed water, weak tide current.

中图分类号: 

  • P75
[1] 京生. 洋山深水港区四期工程开工[J]. 港口科技, 2015(3):14.
[2] DAI Z J, LIU J T, WEI W, et al. Detection of the three gorges dam influence on the Changjiang (Yangtze River) submerged delta[J]. Scientific Reports, 2014, 4:6600.
[3] 吴明阳, 刘国亭. 上海洋山深水港区海域海床演变分析[J]. 海岸工程, 2015, 34(2):24-32. [WU M Y, LIU G T. Analysis of seabed evolution in the Yangshan deepwater port area, Shanghai City[J]. Coastal Engineering, 2015, 34(2):24-32.]
[4] 杜景龙, 杨世伦, 贺松林, 等. 洋山港堵汊工程对邻近海底冲淤影响分析[J]. 海洋工程, 2008, 26(4):53-59. [DU J L, YANG S L, HE S L, et al. Primary analysis on the erosion-accretion change of the seabed around Yangshan Harbor before and after the plugging offshoot project[J]. Coastal Engineering, 2008, 26(4):53-59.]
[5] 左书华, 李蓓, 杨华. 洋山港建设时期海域通道冲淤变化特征分析[J]. 水道港口, 2009, 30(1):14-19. [ZUO S H, LI B, YANG H. Analysis on erosion and accretion characteristics in the channel during construction period of Yangshan Harbor[J]. Journal of Waterway and Harbor, 2009, 30(1):14-19.]
[6] 英晓明. 洋山港建设对海床冲淤演变影响及机制研究[D]. 上海:华东师范大学博士学位论文, 2011. [YING X M. The effect of construction of Yangshan Deepwater Harbor on morphological change and mechanism analysis[D]. Shanghai:Doctoral Dissertation of East China Normal University, 2011.]
[7] 虞志英, 李身铎, 张志林. 上海国际航运中心洋山深水港工程动力地貌响应[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2013:38-44.
[8] YING X M, DING P X, WANG Z B, et al. Morphological impact of the construction of an offshore Yangshan Deepwater Harbor in the port of Shanghai, China[J]. Journal of Coastal Research, 2012, 28(1A):163-173, doi:10.2112/jcoastres-d-11-00046.1.
[9] 杨忠勇, 程和琴, 朱建荣, 等. 洋山港海域潮动力特征及其对工程的响应[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(9):1282-1290. [YANG Z Y, CHENG H Q, ZHU J R, et al. Tidal dynamics of Yangshan Harbor Sea area and its response to the project[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012, 67(9):1282-1290.]
[10] LI L, WANG X H, WILLIAMS D, et al. Numerical Study of the effects of mangrove areas and tidal flats on tides:A case study of Darwin Harbour, Australia[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Oceans, 117(C6)C6011, 2012, doi:10. 1029/2011J(00)494.
[11] 张衡, 朱建荣, 吴辉. 东海黄海渤海8个主要分潮的数值模拟[J]. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2005(3):71-77. [ZHANG H, ZHU J R, WU H. Numerical simulation of eight main tidal constituents in the East China Sea, Yellow Sea and Bohai Sea[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Natural Science), 2005(3):71-77.]
[12] 陈沈良, 李向阳, 俞航, 等. 潮流作用下洋山港水域悬沙和底沙的交换[J]. 海洋学研究, 2008, 26(1):11-17. [CHEN S L, LI X Y, YU H, et al. Exchange between suspended sediments and bed sediments under tidal current action in the Yangshan Harbor waters[J]. Journal of Marine Sciences, 2008, 26(1):11-17.]
[13] 任剑波, 羊天柱. 舟山本岛北部灌门水道及邻近海域潮波特性初步研究[J]. 海洋工程, 2008, 26(1):77-82, 97. [REN J B, YANG T Z. Preliminary research on the characteristics of tides in Quanmen channel and its neighborhood in Zhoushan[J]. The Ocean Engineering, 2008, 26(1):77-82, 97.]
[14] 刘国亭, 许家帅. 上海洋山深水港区水文泥沙特征分析[J]. 水道港口, 2003, 24(3):141-146. [LIU G T, XU J S. Analysis on hydrological and sediment characteristics in Shanghai Yangshan Deepwater Harbor Area[J]. Journal of Waterway and Harbor, 2003, 24(3):141-146.]
[15] 李玉中, 陈沈良. 洋山港海域与长江口相似性研究[J]. 地理学报, 2002, 57(6):662-670. [LI Y Z, CHEN S L. Similarities between Yangshan Harbor sea area and the Yangtze estuary[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2002, 57(6):662-670.]
[16] 方国洪, 郑文振, 陈余镛, 等. 潮汐和潮流的分析和预报[M]. 北京:海洋出版社, 1986:9-11.
[17] SMITH W H F, SANDWELL D T. Global sea floor topography from satellite altimetry and ship depth soundings[J]. Science, 1997, 277(5334):1957-1962.
[18] 海洋图集编委会. 渤海黄海东海海洋图集(水文)[M]. 北京:海洋出版社, 1992:429-432.
[19] CHEN C S, BEARDSLEY R C, COELES G. An unstructured grid, finite-volume coastal ocean model FVCOM user manual[R]. Technical Report SMAST/UMASSD-06-0602. New Bedford:School for Marine Science and Technology, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, 2006.
[20] HUNT J C R, ORR A, ROTTMAN J W, et al. Coriolis effects in mesoscale flows with sharp changes in surface conditions[J]. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2004, 130(603):2703-2731.
[21] NEILL S P. The role of Coriolis in sandbank formation due to a headland/island system[J]. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2008, 79(3):419-428.
[22] WELLS M G. How Coriolis forces can limit the spatial extent of sediment deposition of a large-scale turbidity current[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 2009, 218(1/4):1-5.
[23] 王晓刚, 严忠民. Y型汇流口壅水规律研究[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 36(2):185-188. [WANG X G, YAN Z M. Pattern of backwater at a Y-shaped junction[J]. Journal of Hohai University (Natural Sciences), 2008, 36(2):185-188.]
[1] 李云良, 姚静, 李梦凡, 张奇. 鄱阳湖水流运动与污染物迁移路径的粒子示踪研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(11): 1748-1758.
[2] 卢士强,林卫青,徐祖信,廖振良. 苏州河环境整治二期工程水质影响数值模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 228-231.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 娜,许有鹏, 陈 爽. 苏州城市化进程对降雨特征影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 335 -339 .
[2] 孙维侠, 赵永存, 黄 标, 廖菁菁, 王志刚, 王洪杰. 长三角典型地区土壤环境中Se的空间变异特征及其与人类健康的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 113 .
[3] 胡大伟,卞新民,许 泉. 基于ANN的土壤重金属分布和污染评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 475 -479 .
[4] 张洁| 张志斌| 孙欣欣. 云南省矿产资源开发利用中的主要环境问题[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 61 -65 .
[5] 时连强,李九发,应 铭,左书华,徐海根. 长江口没冒沙演变过程及其对水库工程的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 458 -464 .
[6] 张代钧,许丹宇,任宏洋,曹海彬,郑 敏,刘惠强. 长江三峡水库水污染控制若干问题[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 605 -610 .
[7] 王肇磊, 贺新枝. 晚清时期湖北自然灾害的治理及其经验教训[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(11): 1080 .
[8] 韦 杰, 贺秀斌. 人类活动对嘉陵江流域泥沙负荷的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(2): 196 .
[9] 彭 峰. 国际法与比较法视野中的水权研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(03): 287 .
[10] 郑建蕊| 蒋卫国, 周廷刚, 侯鹏, 李雪. 洞庭湖区湿地景观指数选取与格局分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(03): 305 .