长江流域资源与环境 >> 2017, Vol. 26 >> Issue (03): 368-375.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201703006

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

农田生态补偿横向财政转移支付额度研究——基于选择实验法的生态外溢视角

杨欣, 蔡银莺, 张安录   

  1. 华中农业大学土地管理学院, 湖北 武汉 430070
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-03 修回日期:2016-09-09 出版日期:2017-03-20
  • 通讯作者: 张安录,E-mail:zhanganlu@mail.hzau.edu.cn E-mail:zhanganlu@mail.hzau.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:杨欣(1988~),女,博士,讲师,主要研究方向为土地资源利用与管理.E-mail:yangxin@mail.hzau.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(14JZD009);国家自然科学基金项目(71573101 & 71373095 & 71573099);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(2016YJC790121);中央高校基本科研业务费(2662015QD024)

ESTIMATION OF FARMLAND ECO-COMPENSATION HORIZONTAL TRANSFERRING PAYMENT AMOUNT IN WUHAN METROPOLITAN AREA——FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF SPILLOVER ECOLOGICAL VALUE MEASURED BY CHOICE EXPERIMENT

YANG Xin, CAI Yin-ying, ZHANG An-lu   

  1. College of Land Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
  • Received:2016-06-03 Revised:2016-09-09 Online:2017-03-20
  • Supported by:
    Key Projects of Philosophy and Social Sciences Research, Ministry of Education (14JZD009);National Natural Science Foundation of China (14JZD009&71573101&71373095&71573099);The Research Projects of the Social Science and Humanity on Young Fund of the Ministry of Education (2016YJC790121);the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2662015QD024)

摘要: 农田生态补偿横向财政转移支付是调整农田保护和农地发展之间利益关系的重要环境经济政策,对于实现区域生态环境保护和经济发展之间的相协调具有重要意义。以武汉城市圈为例证,基于生态外溢的视角,运用选择实验法计算基于市民支付意愿的农田生态补偿标准,并修正得到武汉城市圈42个县(市、区)的农田生态补偿横向财政转移支付标准介于683.10~6 169.60元/hm2之间。进一步依据粮食安全法将武汉城市圈42个县(市、区)划分为17个支付区和25个受偿区,得到各县(市、区)的农田生态补偿横向财政转移支付面积。最后依据农田生态补偿横向财政转移支付标准和农田生态补偿横向财政转移支付面积计算出武汉城市圈地方政府县(市、区)间农田生态补偿横向财政转移支付额度的绝对值总和为44.03亿元。研究结果可为农田生态补偿横向财政转移支付体系的构建提供初步的政策建议。

关键词: 农田生态补偿, 横向财政转移支付, 生态外溢, 地方政府, 武汉城市圈

Abstract: Horizontal farmland eco-compensation transferring payment amount is one of the most important policies to coordinate the relationship between farmland protection and development. It is also a fundamental way for local government to balance ecological conservation and economic development. The purpose of this paper is to estimate the horizontal transferring payment among the 42 local governments in Wuhan Metropolitan Area. The ecological compensation criterion of horizontal transferring payment was calculated by applying choice modeling, with a variation from 683.10 Yuan/hm2 to 6169.60 Yuan/hm2 based on the citizens' willingness to pay. Moreover, the 42 districts were classified as 17 paying areas and 25 receiving areas. The farmland eco-compensation horizontal transferring payment in Wuhan Metropolitan Area among the 42 districts then were estimated by multiplying the ecological compensation criterion of horizontal transferring payment with its ecological compensation area of horizontal transferring payment, which was 44.03×108Yuan. The results can provide government with scientific basis to construct ecological compensation criterion of horizontal transferring payment institution.

Key words: farmland ecological compensation, horizontal transferring payment, ecological spill-over, local government, Wuhan Metropolitan Area

中图分类号: 

  • F301.3
[1] SWINTON S M, LUPI F, ROBERTSON G P, et al. Ecosystem services and agriculture:cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits[J]. Ecological Economics, 2007, 64(2):245-252.
[2] GARDNER B D. The economics of agricultural land preservation[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1977, 59(5):1027-1036.
[3] 杨欣, 蔡银莺, 张安录, 等. 农田生态盈亏空间差异与跨区域均衡机制——基于生态账户的武汉城市圈实证分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2013, 23(12):57-64.[YANG X, CAI Y Y, ZHANG A L, et al. Spatial differences of farmland eco-surplus/deficit and its regional equilibrium mechanism——based on the ecological account of Wuhan metropolitan circle[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2013, 23(12):57-64.]
[4] 马爱慧, 蔡银莺, 张安录. 耕地生态补偿相关利益群体博弈分析与解决路径[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2012, 22(7):114-119.[MA A H, CAI Y Y, ZHANG A L. The game theory analysis and solution path on the stakeholders involved in farmland ecological compensation[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2012, 22(7):114-119.]
[5] JANSSEN-JANSEN L B. Space for space, a transferable development rights initiative for Changing the Dutch landscape[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2008, 87(3):192-200.
[6] 汪晖, 陶然. 论土地发展权转移与交易的"浙江模式"——制度起源、操作模式及其重要含义[J]. 管理世界, 2009(8):39-52.
[7] LYNCH L. Land preservation programs achieve high levels of efficiency[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2009, 91(5):1368-1374.
[8] 刘炯. 生态转移支付对地方政府环境治理的激励效应——基于东部六省46个地级市的经验证据[J]. 财经研究, 2015, 41(2):54-65.[LIU J. On the incentive effect of ecological transfer payments on environmental governance of local governments——evidence from 46 eastern prefecture-level cities[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2015, 41(2):54-65.]
[9] MORRIS J, GOWING D J G, MILLS J, et al. Reconciling agricultural economic and environmental objectives:the case of recreating wetlands in the Fenland area of eastern England[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2000, 79(2/3):245-257.
[10] 余斌, 揭毅, 罗静, 等. 武汉城市圈产业发展的生态转型与空间优化[J]. 地理研究, 2010, 29(2):313-326.[YU B, JIE Y, LUO J, et al. Study on the ecological transition and spatial optimization of industrial development in Wuhan settlement groups[J]. Geographical Research, 2010, 29(2):313-326.]
[11] 杨欣, 蔡银莺, 张安录. 武汉城市圈跨区域农田生态补偿转移支付额度测算[J]. 经济地理, 2013, 33(12):141-146.[YANG X, CAI Y Y, ZHANG A L. Farmland's Ecological Compensation among Regions in Wuhan Urban City[J]. Economic Geography, 2013, 33(12):141-146.]
[12] 马爱慧, 蔡银莺, 张安录, 等. 两型社会建设跨区域土地生态补偿[J]. 中国土地科学, 2010, 24(7):66-70, 76.[MA A H, CAI Y Y, ZHANG A L, et al. Land eco-compensation between regions under the framework of constructing resource-saving and environmental-friendly society[J]. China Land Science, 2010, 24(7):66-70, 76.]
[13] 谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明, 等. 基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(8):1243-1254.[XIE G D, ZHANG C X, ZHANG L M, et al. Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(8):1243-1254.]
[14] LANCASTER K J. A new approach to consumer theory[J]. The Journal of Political Economy, 1966, 74(2):132-157.
[15] 杨欣, BURTON M, 张安录. 基于潜在分类模型的农田生态补偿标准测算——一个离散选择实验模型的实证[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2016, 26(7):27-36.[YANG X, BURTON M, ZHANG A L. Estimation of farmland eco-compensation criteria based on latent class model:a case of a discrete choice experiment[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2016, 26(7):27-36.]
[16] MCCARTNEY A. The policy relevance of choice modelling:an application to the Ningaloo and proposed capes marine parks[D]. Crawley:Doctor Dissertation of University of Western Australia, 2011.
[17] 杨欣, 蔡银莺, 张孝宇, 等. 基于生态账户的农田生态补偿空间转移研究——以武汉城市圈48个县(市、区)为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(2):197-207.[YANG X, CAI Y Y, ZHANG X Y, et al. Measurement of farmland eco-compensation and its spatial transfer in Wuhan metropolitan area based on ecological account[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(2):197-207.]
[18] 吴晓青, 洪尚群, 段昌群, 等. 区际生态补偿机制是区域间协调发展的关键[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2003, 12(1):13-16.[WU X Q, HONG S Q, DUAN C Q, et al. Inter-regional ecological compensation system and regional co-ordinative development[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2003, 12(1):13-16.]
[19] 刘春腊, 刘卫东, 徐美. 基于生态价值当量的中国省域生态补偿额度研究[J]. 资源科学, 2014, 36(1):148-155.[LIU C L, LIU W D, XU M. The provincial eco-compensation standard of China based on ecological value equivalents[J]. Resources Science, 2014, 36(1):148-155.]
[20] 伏润民, 缪小林. 中国生态功能区财政转移支付制度体系重构-基于拓展的能值模型衡量的生态外溢价值[J]. 经济研究, 2015(3):47-61.[FU R M, MIU X L. A new financial transfer payment system in ecological function areas in China:based on the spillover ecological value measured by the expansion emergy analysis[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2015(3):47-61.]
[21] 王女杰, 刘建, 吴大千, 等. 基于生态系统服务价值的区域生态补偿-以山东省为例[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(23):6646-6653.[WANG N J, LIU J, WU D Q, et al. Regional eco-compensation based on ecosystem service assessment:a case study of Shandong Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(23):6646-6653.]
[1] 崔玮, 苗建军, 邹伟. 武汉城市圈土地利用空间关联的碳排放效率及其收敛性分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(12): 1824-1831.
[2] 王慧敏, 危小建, 刘耀林. 武汉城市圈公路沿线土地利用变化规律分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(10): 1585-1593.
[3] 周琰, 张安录. 武汉城市圈城市用地扩张对经济增长贡献度的动态研究——“两型社会”试验区设置前后的比较[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(07): 1043-1051.
[4] 姜大川, 肖伟华, 范晨媛, 宫博亚. 武汉城市圈水资源及水环境承载力分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(05): 761-768.
[5] 黄亚林, 丁镭, 张冉, 刘超, 曾克峰. 武汉城市圈城市化发展与环境空气质量关系探讨[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(12): 2117-2124.
[6] 何建华, 王宵君, 杜超, 李纯, 施璇. 武汉城市圈土地利用变化系统仿真模拟与驱动力分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(08): 1270-1278.
[7] 胡鸿兴, 何伟, 沈虹, 王钰. 湖北“两圈”区域发展可持续性评价与预测[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(04): 351-.
[8] 余 斌,李星明,曾菊新. 武汉城市圈产业发展的空间优化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(5): 560-560.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 胡学玉, 孙宏发, 陈德林. 铜绿山矿冶废弃地优势植物重金属的积累与迁移[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 436 .
[2] 宋述军,周万村. 岷江流域土地利用结构对地表水水质的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(5): 712 .
[3] 杨 选. 国内外典型水治理模式及对武汉水治理的借鉴[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(5): 584 .
[4] 李恒鹏,杨桂山,刘晓玫,万荣荣. 流域土地利用变化的长周期水文效应及管理策略[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 450 -455 .
[5] 王学雷,蔡述明,任宪友,陈世俭. 三峡库区湿地生态建设与保护利用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(2): 149 -153 .
[6] 廖顺宝,李泽辉. 四川省人口分布与土地利用的关系及人口数据空间化试验[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(6): 557 -561 .
[7] 尹占娥,许世远. 上海浦东新区土地利用变化及其生态环境效应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 430 .
[8] 董林水, 张旭东, 周金星, 李冬雪. 青藏铁路沿线北段植被物种丰富度及盖度的动态变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 551 .
[9] 段七零. 我国原油流动的空间格局研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 573 .
[10] 胡贤辉,张 霞,杨钢桥. 湖北省土地利用结构变化及其驱动机制分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 43 .