基于村域的乡村多功能类型划分及评价研究——以江苏省金坛市为例

doi:10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201703005

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 随着城镇化的快速推进，我国经济社会发展进入转型期，乡村地域向多元方向发展和演变。近年来，乡村多功能发展成为地理学研究的重要课题，成为指导乡村转型发展的新理论和新范式。在系统梳理乡村多功能发展概念及其内涵基础上，探索村域尺度下我国乡村地域多功能的类型划分及其评价方法，并开展了江苏省金坛市乡村地域生态功能、农业功能、工业功能、生活功能及其综合功能的分级评价与空间分异研究，进而识别出全市分村域的地域主导功能类型。结果表明：生态功能高值区主要分布在环长荡湖、直溪镇和薛埠镇等水网密集、林地资源丰富的地区；农业功能高值区主要分布在金坛市中部和南部等河网平原地区；工业功能高值区主要集中在中心城区周边和尧塘镇等城市集聚发展区域；生活功能高值区主要集中在中心城区周边等地；乡村地域多功能指数呈现出以城区为中心、向外围逐渐递减的空间分异特征；全市乡村地域主导功能可划分为6种类型，并揭示其空间分布特征、分别总结其所对应的乡村发展策略。研究结果可为明确乡村功能定位、优化主体功能区划、完善乡村管理政策以及促进乡村可持续发展提供科学依据。

关键词: 村域, 多功能, 类型划分, 评价, 金坛市

Abstract: As the rapid progress of industrialization and urbanization, China has been on the key phase of economic and social transformation and reconstruction between urban and rural areas, certainly bringing opportunities as well as shocks and challenges to rural areas. Recent multifunctional rural transition has been one of the most important theories to evaluate rural development, and has also been a hot research direction of rural geography in China. First, this paper systematically sorted out the viewpoints of the research connotations of multifunctional rural transition at home and abroad in the past 20 years, and then explored how to divide types of rural territorial multi-functions on village scale in China, and further constructed a multi-functionality evaluation index system and index analysis model. Second, using the well-developed Jintan city located in the south of Jiangsu province as a case, this paper evaluated and graded the territorial functions of ecology, agriculture, industry, living and comprehensive function. Last, the spatial differentiation characters of rural multi-functions have been revealed and the dominated functions of each spatial unit have been identified in Jintan city. Several conclusions were as follow:(1) Ecology-oriented functional areas were mainly distributed in the areas around the Changdang Lake, Zhixi town and western Xuebu town, where the densities of rivers and forests were relatively high; (2) The agriculture function indexes were high in the plain river network region located in both the middle and south of Jintan city; (3) Industry-oriented functional areas were mainly distributed in the Yaotang town and the surroundings of the central urban area, and all those belong to the industrial cluster districts according to the urban planning of Jintan;(4) Living function indexes were high in the surroundings of the city's build-up areas and whose spatial distribution characters were similar to that of rural industry functions; 5) The rural multifunction indexes were gradually weakened from city's core areas to the edges, and there had been a significant correlation between rural multi-functional development and urban-rural relationship; 6) According to the evaluation indexes mentioned above, six functional types had been identified in the 96 regional units, and they were comprehensive development type, ecology-dominated type, agriculture-dominated type, industry-dominated type, living-dominated type and balanced development type, and each one had significant characteristics of spatial concentration within the city of Jintan, and then several development strategies corresponding to those types had been proposed. In conclusion, this paper provided a scientific reference for identifying rural development orientation, accomplishing main-functional zone division, improving policy measures of rural management, and promoting rural sustainable development; meanwhile, it was a meaningful supplement for the quantitative research of rural multifunctional development on village scale in China.

Key words: village scale, multifunction, types division, evaluation, Jintan city

中图分类号:

K901.8

李智, 范琳芸, 张小林. 基于村域的乡村多功能类型划分及评价研究——以江苏省金坛市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(03): 359-367.

LI Zhi, FAN Lin-yun, ZHANG Xiao-lin. TYPES DIVISION OF RURAL MULTIFUNCTIONS AND THEIR EVALUATION ON VILLAGE SCALE: A CASE OF JINTAN CITY, JIANGSU PROVINCE[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2017, 26(03): 359-367.

参考文献

[1] 张小林. 乡村概念辨析[J]. 地理学报, 1998, 53(4):365-371.[ZHANG X L. On discrimination of rural definitions[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1998, 53(4):365-371.]
[2] WILSON G A. Multifunctional Agriculture:A Transition Theory Perspective[M]. Trowbridge:Cromwell Press, 2007.
[3] HOLMES J. Impulses towards a multifunctional transition in rural Australia:gaps in the research agenda[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2006, 22(2):142-160.
[4] ROMSTAD E. Multifunctional rural land management:economics and policies[J]. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2010, 61(1):202-204.
[5] DE GROOT R. Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2006, 75(3/4):175-186.
[6] 房艳刚, 刘继生. 基于多功能理论的中国乡村发展多元化探讨——超越"现代化"发展范式[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(2):257-270.[FANG Y G, LIU J S. Diversified agriculture and rural development in China based on multifunction theory:beyond modernization paradigm[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(2):257-270.]
[7] 李平星, 陈雯, 孙伟. 经济发达地区乡村地域多功能空间分异及影响因素——以江苏省为例[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(6):797-807.[LI P X, CHEN W, SUN W. Spatial differentiation and influencing factors of rural territorial multifunctions in developed regions:a case study of Jiangsu Province[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(6):797-807.]
[8] 刘彦随, 刘玉, 陈玉福. 中国地域多功能性评价及其决策机制[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(10):1379-1389.[LIU Y S, LIU Y, CHEN Y F. Territorial multi-functionality evaluation and decision-making mechanism at county scale in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(10):1379-1389.]
[9] 樊杰. 中国主体功能区划方案[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(2):186-201.[FAN J. Draft of major function oriented zoning of China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(2):186-201.]
[10] 李平星, 陈诚, 陈江龙. 乡村地域多功能时空格局演变及影响因素研究——以江苏省为例[J]. 地理科学, 2015, 35(7):845-851.[LI P X, CHEN C, CHEN J L. Temporal evolution and spatial differentiation of rural territorial multifunctions and the influencing factors:the case of Jiangsu province[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2015, 35(7):845-851.]
[11] 宋志军, 刘黎明. 北京市城郊农业区多功能演变的空间特征[J]. 地理科学, 2011, 31(4):427-433.[SONG Z J, LIU L M. Spatial characteristics analysis for multifunctional transition of suburban agricultural areas in Beijing[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2011, 31(4):427-433.]
[12] 林若琪, 蔡运龙. 转型期乡村多功能性及景观重塑[J]. 人文地理, 2012, 27(2):45-49.[LIN R Q, CAI Y L. Study on rural multifunction and landscape reformulation in the transitional period[J]. Human Geography, 2012, 27(2):45-49.]
[13] ARGENT N, TONTS M. A multicultural and multifunctional countryside? International labour migration and Australia's productivist heartlands[J]. Population, Space and Place, 2015, 21(2):140-156.
[14] DIJST M, ELBERSEN B, WILLIS K. The challenge of multi-functional land use in rural areas[J]. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2005, 48(1):3-6.
[15] WILSON G A. The spatiality of multifunctional agriculture:a human geography perspective[J]. Geoforum, 2009, 40(2):269-280.
[16] 张京祥, 申明锐, 赵晨. 超越线性转型的乡村复兴——基于南京市高淳区两个典型村庄的比较[J]. 经济地理, 2015, 35(3):1-8.[ZHANG J X, SHEN M R, ZHAO C. Rural renaissance that beyond linear transformation:comparative study of two typical villages in Gaochun, Nanjing[J]. Economic Geography, 2015, 35(3):1-8.]
[17] 张雪梅. 吉林省乡村地域功能分异特征及其发展模式研究[D]. 长春:东北师范大学硕士学位论文, 2013.[ZHANG X M. Study on the spatial differentiation of rural areas'function and rural development patterns of Jilin province[D]. Changchun:Master Dissertation of Northeast Normal University, 2013.]
[18] 李裕瑞, 刘彦随, 龙花楼. 黄淮海典型地区村域转型发展的特征与机理[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(6):771-782.[LI Y R, LIU Y S, LONG H L. Characteristics and mechanism of village transformation development in typical regions of Huang-Huai-Hai plain[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012, 67(6):771-782.]
[19] MARSDEN T. Exploring political economy approaches in agriculture[J]. Area, 1988, 20(4):315-322.
[20] MARSDEN T. Rural futures:the consumption countryside and its regulation[J]. Sociologia Ruralis, 1999, 39(4):501-526.
[21] WILSON G A. From productivism to post-productivism … and back again? Exploring the (un)changed natural and mental landscapes of European agriculture[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2001, 26(1):77-102.
[22] WIGGERING H, DALCHOW C, GLEMNITZ M, et al. Indicators for multifunctional land use-linking socio-economic requirements with landscape potentials[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2006, 6(1):238-249.
[23] 刘玉, 刘彦随, 郭丽英. 乡村地域多功能的内涵及其政策启示[J]. 人文地理, 2011, 26(6):103-106, 132.[LIU Y, LIU Y S, GUO L Y. Connotations of rural regional multifunction and its policy implications in China[J]. Human Geography, 2011, 26(6):103-106, 132.]
[24] COSTANZA R, DE GROOT R, SUTTON P, et al. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2014, 26:152-158.
[25] 谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明, 等. 基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(8):1243-1254.[XIE G D, ZHANG C X, ZHANG L M, et al. Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(8):1243-1254.]
[26] 张超亚, 张小林, 李红波. 快速交通对区域中心城市日常可达性影响——以长江三角洲地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(2):194-201.[ZHANG C Y, ZHANG X L, LI H B. Influence of rapid transit on daily accessibility of regional center cities——a case study of Yangtze river delta[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2015, 24(2):194-201.]
[27] 吴威, 曹有挥, 曹卫东, 等. 区域高速公路网络构建对可达性空间格局的影响——以安徽沿江地区为实证[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6):726-731.[WU W, CAO Y H, CAO W D, et al. Impact of regional expressway network on the accessibility pattern——the case of the belt along the Yangtze river in Anhui province[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2007, 16(6):726-731.]
[28] 贾艳红, 赵军, 南忠仁, 等. 熵权法在草原生态安全评价研究中的应用——以甘肃牧区为例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2007, 21(1):17-21.[JIA Y H, ZHAO J, NAN Z R, et al. The application of entropy-right method to the study of ecological security evaluation of grassland——a case study at the ecological security evaluation of grassland to pastoral area of Gansu[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2007, 21(1):17-21.]
[29] 欧向军, 甄峰, 秦永东, 等. 区域城市化水平综合测度及其理想动力分析——以江苏省为例[J]. 地理研究, 2008, 27(5):993-1002.[OU X J, ZHEN F, QIN Y D, et al. Study on compression level and ideal impetus of regional urbanization:the case of Jiangsu Province[J]. Geographical Research, 2008, 27(5):993-1002.]
[30] HOEFLE S W. Multi-functionality, juxtaposition and conflict in the Central Amazon:will tourism contribute to rural livelihoods and save the rainforest?[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2016, 44:24-36.
[31] HOLMES J. The multifunctional transition in Australia's tropical savannas:the emergence of consumption, protection and indigenous values[J]. Geographical Research, 2010, 48(3):265-280.
[32] WOODS M. New directions in rural studies?[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2012, 28(1):1-4.
[33] MOONEY P H, HUNT S A. Food security:the elaboration of contested claims to a consensus frame[J]. Rural Sociology, 2009, 74(4):469-497.
[34] WOODS M. Rural geography III:rural futures and the future of rural geography[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2012, 36(1):125-134.
[35] 毛丹, 王萍. 英语学术界的乡村转型研究[J]. 社会学研究, 2014(1):194-216.[MAO D, WANG P. The evolution of western rural restructuring research[J]. Sociological Studies, 2014(1):194-216.]
[36] CLOKE P J, MARSDEN T, MOONEY P. Handbook of Rural Studies[M]. London:SAGE, 2006.
[37] 龙花楼, 刘彦随, 邹健. 中国东部沿海地区乡村发展类型及其乡村性评价[J]. 地理学报, 2009, 64(4):426-434.[LONG H L, LIU Y S, ZOU J. Assessment of rural development types and their rurality in eastern coastal China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009, 64(4):426-434.]

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed