长江流域资源与环境 >> 2018, Vol. 27 >> Issue (08): 1891-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201808025

• 自然灾害 • 上一篇    

湖北省湖库洪水调蓄能力及其空间分异特征

潘方杰1,2,王宏志1,2*,王璐瑶1,2   

  1. (1. 华中师范大学可持续发展研究中心,湖北 武汉430079;2. 华中师范大学城市与环境科学学院,湖北 武汉430079)
  • 出版日期:2018-08-20 发布日期:2018-11-09

Spatial Differentiation of Flood Regulation Service of Lakes and Reservoirs in Hubei Province

PAN Fangjie1,2, WANG Hongzhi1,2,WANG Luyao1,2   

  1. (1.Research Institute of Sustainable Development,Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079,China; 2.College of Urban&Environmental Sciences,Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079,China)
  • Online:2018-08-20 Published:2018-11-09

摘要:

湖泊是抵御湖区水系洪水灾害的天然屏障,而水库是现代防洪工程体系的重要组成部分,两者共同肩负着防洪减灾的重任。为探明湖北省湖库洪水调蓄能力,选取湖泊可调蓄水量、水库防洪库容作为评估指标,通过构建湖库洪水调蓄能力评估模型,分析全省湖库洪水调蓄能力及空间分异特征。结论如下:(1)湖北省湖泊、水库综合洪水调蓄量为416.02×108m3,其中湖泊可调蓄水量为79.69×108m3,水库防洪库容为336.33×108m3,分别占湖库洪水调蓄功能总量的19.16%和80.84%;(2)湖泊可调蓄水量较大的地区包括武汉、荆州、鄂州、黄石等地市以及鄂东丘陵、江汉平原,而单位面积湖泊调蓄洪水能力较强的地区为鄂州、黄石、咸宁、黄冈,其值分别为405.99×104、400.31×104、392.32×104和391.22×104m3/km2;(3)水库防洪库容较大的地区主要为鄂西山地的宜昌和十堰,分别为119.18×108m3和 103.03×108m3,占全省防洪库容总量的66.06%,而鄂州、天门和神农架水库防洪库容极小,不足全省水库总防洪库容的1%;(4)湖库综合调蓄能力空间分布特征与水库洪水调蓄能力空间分布相一致;从湖泊、水库洪水调蓄能力的构成来看,以湖泊防洪为主和以水库防洪为主的地市不相上下,水库在湖北省防洪体系中占绝对主体地位,同时湖泊也发挥着不可或缺的作用。针对湖泊萎缩、水库险病等突出问题,可以通过退田还湖、除险加固等工作提高湖库综合调洪能力。本研究可为湖北省湖库防洪建设提供科学指导。
关键词: 湖泊;水库;洪水调蓄功能;空间分异;湖北省

Abstract: Lakes are natural buffers against flood disasters, and reservoirs are an important part of the modern flood control system. They work together to play an important role in flood control and disaster reduction. This paper selected the indexes of adjustable storage capacity and flood storage capacity for lakes and reservoirs, respectively, and built the flood storage capacity evaluation model to evaluate the flood control and storage capacities of lakes and reservoirs in Hubei Province, and analyze their spatial distribution patterns. The results are as follows:(1)The total flood regulation service of lakes and reservoirs is 416.02×108m3 in Hubei Province. The adjustable storage capacity of lakes is 79.69×108m3 and the flood control capacity of reservoirs is 336.33×108m3, contributing 19.16% and 80.84% of the total flood control capacity, respectively.(2)As for the flood storage capacity of lakes, the area with higher total capacities include Wuhan, Jingzhou, Ezhou, Huangshi, mountain regions of eastern Hubei and Jianghan Plain. While the per unit flood storage capacities of Ezhou, Huangshi, Xianning and Huanggang is  higher, with the value of 405.99×104、400.31×104、392.32×104 and 391.22×104m3/km2, respectively.(3)As for the flood storage capacity of reservoirs, the value of Yichang and Shiyan, located hilly regions of western Hubei, is 119.18×108m3 and 103.03×108m3, respectively, accounting for 66.06% of the total reservoir flood storage capacity in Hubei Province. While Ezhou, Tianmen and Shennongjia only contributes less than 1% of the total reservoir flood storage capacity.(4)The spatial distribution of total flood regulation service of lakes and reservoirs is consistent with that of flood storage capacity of reservoirs. When the composition of flood regulation service of lakes and reservoirs is considered, the amount of cities dominated by flood regulation service of lakes and reservoirs are similar. While the reservoirs play the dominant role in the flood control system of Hubei province, the role of lakes are also indispensable. In response to the problem of lake shrinking and reservoir disease spreading, the measures of returning farmland to lake and renovating and reinforcing reservoirs, as well as other effective measures that can improve flood regulation service, should be implemented. This study can provide scientific guidance for flood control construction of lakes and reservoirs in Hubei Province.
Key words:lakes; reservoirs; flood regulation service; spatial differentiation; Hubei Province

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 胥勤勉,杨达源,董 杰,周 彬. 滇池水环境治理的“调水”“活水”工程[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 116 -119 .
[2] 梁 彬,邓振平,梁小平,朱明秋,关碧珠,周 密. 湘西大龙洞岩溶流域生态环境分析与治理对策[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 764 -769 .
[3] 刘 伟. 长江经济带区域经济差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 131 -135 .
[4] 张利平, 夏军, 胡志芳. 中国水资源状况与水资源安全问题分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(2): 116 .
[5] 储胜金,许 刚. 浙北山区土地利用与生态保护的冲突与协调机制研究冲突与协调机制研究——以天目山自然保护区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 24 -29 .
[6] 任晓冬, 黄明杰. 赤水河流域产业状况与综合流域管理策略[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(2): 97 .
[7] 王玉, 贾晓波, 张文广, 方淑波, 姚懿函, 安树青. 江苏海岸带土地利用变化及驱动力分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(z1): 7 .
[8] 郭跃, 程晓昀, 朱芳, 姜瑞华. 基于生态足迹的江苏省生态安全动态研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(11): 1327 .
[9] 刘光生|王根绪| 张伟. 三江源区气候及水文变化特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(03): 302 .
[10] 李强, 刘德, 陈贵川, 李永华, 王中. 基于WRF三峡地区不同区域降水中下垫面效应数值试验研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(06): 739 .