长江流域资源与环境 >> 2019, Vol. 28 >> Issue (01): 222-230.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201901023

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

资本禀赋对农户水土保持技术价值认知的影响——以黄土高原区为例

黄晓慧,王礼力*,陆迁   

  1. (西北农林科技大学经济管理学院,陕西 杨凌712100)
  • 出版日期:2019-01-20 发布日期:2019-02-20

Capital Endowment Influencing on Farmers Value Perception of Soil and Water Conservation Technology——Take the Loess Plateau as An Example

HUANG Xiao-hui, WANG Li-li, LU Qian   

  1. (College of Economics and Management, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, Yangling 712100, China)
  • Online:2019-01-20 Published:2019-02-20

摘要: 农户对水土保持技术的价值认知,不仅反映了农户对水土保持技术的主观认识和接受程度,而且影响到水土流失治理的成效和美丽乡村建设的进程。鉴于此,基于黄土高原区1 152户农户调研数据、采用Heckman Selection Model实证分析了资本禀赋对农户水土保持技术的价值认知以及认知程度的影响。研究结果表明:(1)农户对水土保持技术的增产价值、增收价值、生态价值认知程度较高的农民比例分别为13.89%、12.5%、19.01%,农民对水土保持技术的价值认知不高。(2)影响农民对水土保持技术增产价值认知程度的因素主要有受教育程度、劳动力数量、房屋类型、耕地面积、村干部、相互信任、相互帮忙;影响增收价值认知程度的因素主要有房屋类型、相互信任、相互帮助;劳动力数量、房屋类型、相互信任、相互帮忙、信息渠道等变量则显著影响了农民对生态价值认知程度。

Abstract: Farmers’ value cognition of soil and water conservation technology,not only reflects the farmers subjective understanding and acceptance of soil and water conservation technology, but also affects the effectiveness of soil erosion control and the process of the construction of the beautiful countryside. Given this,based on survey data of 1 152 farmers in Loess Plateau area,Heckman Selection Model was used in this paper to analyze capital endowment influencing on farmers value perception of soil and water conservation technology.The results showed that, the proportion of higher production value in soil and water conservation technology perceived by farmers was 13.89%, higher income value was 12.5%, higher ecological value was 19.01%.Farmers did not know highly about the value of soil and water conservation technology.(2)The factors that affect the farmers’ production value cognitive degree of soil and water conservation technology were mainly included in the level of education, the number of labor, the type of housing, the area of cultivated land, the village cadres, mutual trust and mutual help.The factors that affect the farmers’ income value cognitive degree of soil and water conservation technology were mainly included in the type of housing, mutual trust and mutual help.The factors that affect the farmers’ ecological value cognitive degree of soil and water conservation technology were mainly included in the number of labor, the type of housing, mutual trust,mutual help,information channels.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 赵雲泰 | 黄贤金 | 陈志刚 | 彭佳雯. 基于DEA的中国农地非农化效率及其变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(10): 1228 .
[2] 赵登忠|林初学|谭德宝|陈永柏. 清江流域水布垭水库二氧化碳大气廓线空间分布及其水环境效应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(12): 1495 .
[3] 冷寒冰|马利静|秦 俊. 滨海盐碱地改良对绿地碳汇效益影响的研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(Z2): 75 .
[4] 李 博,唐世浩. 基于TRMM卫星资料分析三峡蓄水前后的局地降水变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(05): 617 .
[5] 戴其文,彭瑜,刘澈元,翟禄新. 猫儿山自然保护区生态受益者支付意愿及影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(07): 911 .
[6] 王 骏,丁明涛,庙 成,周 鹏,黄 英. 基于GIS和AHP的芦山地震灾区泥石流危险性评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(11): 1580 .
[7] 尹炜, 朱惇, 雷俊山, 贾海燕, 曾祉祥. 丹江口水库典型消落区不同土地利用类型土壤养分分布[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(07): 1185 -1191 .
[8] 王怀清, 殷剑敏, 孔萍, 占明锦. 鄱阳湖流域千年旱涝变化特点及R/S分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(07): 1214 -1220 .
[9] 段唯鑫, 郭生练, 王俊. 长江上游大型水库群对宜昌站水文情势影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(01): 120 -130 .
[10] 朱强, 杨世伦, 孟翊, 杨海飞, 吴创收, 史本伟. 近期长江口南港河槽沉积地貌变异及其可能原因[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(04): 560 -566 .