长江流域资源与环境 >> 2019, Vol. 28 >> Issue (04): 768-782.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201904004

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

成都市社会空间结构演变研究(2000~2010)

罗若愚,钟易霖*   

  1. (电子科技大学公共管理学院,四川 成都 611731)
  • 出版日期:2019-04-20 发布日期:2019-05-10

Socio-spatial Structure of Chengdu and Its Evolution(2000~2010)

LUO Ruo-yu,ZHONG Yi-lin   

  1. (1.School of Public Affairs and Administration, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China,Chengdu 611731, China)
  • Online:2019-04-20 Published:2019-05-10

摘要: 以第5次和第6次人口普查数据为基础,运用因子和聚类分析等方法研究了中心城市成都2000~2010年间的社会空间结构演变趋势。研究发现:10年间成都城市社会空间结构的主因子、社会区、结构模式均发生了显著变化。主因子演变特征归纳为一般工薪阶层及专业技术人员因子和产业工人因子呈现较大变化;而外来人口和居住条件因子、高学历人口和少数民族人口因子呈现一定的稳定性和持续性。社会区演变特点归纳为中心老城区空间结构优化与功能定位升级,并向“三降两提”演变;知识分子居住区扩展并与少数民族聚集区分离,呈现出居住分异趋势;外来人口逐渐向二三产业流动且集聚区规模扩大;农业人口聚集区逐渐远郊化及蓝领人口区域的凸显。社会空间结构模式由2000年的单一化和同质化的“圈层+扇形”结构,向2010年的“圈层+扇形+多核心+多组团”格局演变,各类型空间区域扩大,空间异质化更为明晰。

Abstract: Based on the data of the 5th and 6th censuses, factor and cluster analysis and other methods were used to study the evolution trend of social spatial structure in the central city of Chengdu from 2000 to 2010. It is found that the main factors, social areas and structural patterns of urban social spatial structure in Chengdu have changed significantly in the past 10 years. The evolution characteristics of the main factors can be summarized as follows: the factors of general wage earners, professional and technical personnel and industrial workers show great changes; while the factors of immigrants and living conditions, highly educated population and minority population show certain stability and sustainability. The evolution characteristics of social areas can be summarized as the optimization of spatial structure and upgrading of function orientation in the old urban areas, and the evolution towards “three descent and two mention”; the expansion of intellectuals’ residential areas and the separation from minority agglomeration areas, showing a trend of residential differentiation; the gradual migration of foreign population to secondary and tertiary industries and the expansion of agglomeration areas; and the agglomeration districts of agricultural population gradually become suburbanized and the prominence of blue-collar population areas. The pattern of social spatial structure has evolved from the single and homogeneous “circle + fan” structure in 2000 to the “circle + fan + multi-core + multi-group” pattern in 2010. Various types of spatial regions have expanded and the spatial heterogeneity has become clearer.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 庄建琦, 崔鹏. 基于BP神经网络泥石流沟发育阶段的判定[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(9): 849 .
[2] 涂洁|刘琪璟|王辉民|廖迎春|李燕燕. 江西千烟洲木荷液流特征及其与气象因子的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(02): 267 .
[3] 李丹, 郭生练, 洪兴骏, 郭靖. 汉江流域1960~2014年降雨极值时空变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(09): 1448 -1456 .
[4] 王毅,郭跃. 喀斯特地貌区植被覆盖与地形因子的空间关系分析——以贵州普定县为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(01): 86 .
[5] 张大鹏, 曹卫东, 姚兆钊, 岳洋, 任亚文. 上海大都市区物流企业区位分布特征及其演化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1365 .
[6] 张英浩, 陈江龙, 程 钰. 环境规制对中国区域绿色经济效率的影响机理研究——基于超效率模型和空间面板计量模型实证分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2407 -2418 .
[7] 刘金科, 韩贵琳, 阳昆桦, 柳满. 九龙江流域河水溶解态碳的时空变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2578 -2587 .
[8] 朱顺顺, 章锦河, 胡欢, 陈草惠. 旅游发展的生态系统服务价值增值效应研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(03): 603 -613 .
[9] 黄炎忠, 罗小锋, 刘迪, 余威震, 唐林. 农户有机肥替代化肥技术采纳的影响因素 ——对高意愿低行为的现象解释 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(03): 632 -641 .
[10] 袁颖红, 李丽, 芮绍云, 周际海, 刘贵军. 生物质炭及过氧化钙对旱地红壤CH4、CO2和N2O排放的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(03): 642 -650 .