长江流域资源与环境 >> 2019, Vol. 28 >> Issue (06): 1434-1445.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201906018

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

长三角城市群臭氧浓度的时空分异及驱动因素

黄小刚1,2,邵天杰1*,赵景波1,3,曹军骥3,宋永永1   

  1. (1.陕西师范大学地理科学与旅游学院,陕西 西安 710119;2.山西师范大学地理科学学院,山西 临汾 041004;
    3.中国科学院地球环境研究所气溶胶化学与物理重点实验室,陕西 西安710061)
  • 出版日期:2019-06-20 发布日期:2019-06-20

Spatio-temporal Differentiation of Ozone Concentration and Its Driving Factors in Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration

HUANG Xiao-gang1,2, SHAO Tian-jie1, ZHAO Jing-bo1,3, CAO Jun-ji3, SONG Yong-yong1   

  1. (1. School of Geography and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China; 2. College of Geographical 
    Sciences, Shanxi Normal University, Linfen 041004, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Aerosol Chemistry and Physics, 
    Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi’ an 710061, China)
  • Online:2019-06-20 Published:2019-06-20

摘要: 运用克里金插值、空间自相关分析、冷热点分析和地理探测等定量分析方法,对长三角城市群2015~2017年O3浓度的时空分异特征及驱动因素进行了探讨。结果表明:(1)2015~2017年长三角城市群O3浓度呈上升趋势,O3日最大8 h滑动平均值第90百分位数平均浓度由149 μg/m3上升到166 μg/m3,平均超标率由9.3%上升到12.1%,以O3为首要污染物的天数占超标总天数的比例由32.3%上升到46.4%。(2)受气温和降水量年际波动的影响,各年份O3月均浓度变化曲线形状不同。但O3超标都主要发生在4~9月,超标天数分别占2015、2016、2017年的88.3%、98.2%和97.0%。(3)由于安徽O3浓度快速上升,长三角城市群O3浓度空间分布格局由东高西低演变为北高南低,且同质化增强、异质性减弱。(4)随着O3浓度的上升,O3浓度热点区由环太湖地区向南京都市圈扩展,冷点区在安徽有明显收缩。(5)地理探测表明,长三角城市群O3浓度空间分异主要受经济规模、城市化和排放源等社会经济因素驱动,且均呈正向影响。自然因素中的降水量和风速呈负向影响,分别对O3有显著的清除和扩散作用。

Abstract: This study presents the spatio-temporal differentiation of ozone concentration and its driving factors in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration from 2015 to 2017 via Kriging interpolation, spatial auto-correlation, hot and cool spot analysis, and geographical detection. The results show that: 1) the concentration of ozone rises during this period with 90th percentile of maximum daily 8-h average ozone concentration rising from 149 μg/m3 to 166 μg/m3, the percentage of days which exceed standard (GB 3095-2012) going up from 9.3% to 12.1%, and the proportion of days with ozone as primary pollutant to total polluted days increasing from 32.3% to 46.4%; 2) impacted by the large inter-annual fluctuations of temperature and precipitation, the curves of monthly ozone concentration differ slightly in different years; the days with over-limit ozone concentration mainly occurred from April to September, which account for 88.3%, 98.2% and 97.0% of the year 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively; 3) due to the rapid increase of ozone concentration in Anhui province, the spatial distribution pattern of ozone concentration evolves from high in East and low in West to high in North and low in South, but the concentration is more homogenized than before; 4) with the rise of ozone concentration, the hot spots expand from Taihu Lake area to Nanjing metropolitan area, while the cool spots shrink evidently in Anhui Province; 5) the analysis of geographical detector shows that socioeconomic factors such as economic scale, urbanization and emission source have a significantly positive impact on the spatial distribution of ozone concentration, while precipitation and wind have a negative impact on the spatial distribution of ozone concentration since the precipitation scavenges ozone and wind promotes the dispersion of ozone.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 许峰, 祁士华, 高媛, 邢新丽. 绵阳市代表性点位土壤多环芳烃剖面分布特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(2): 192 .
[2] 胡振鹏, 葛, 刚, 刘成林, 陈伏生, 李, 述. 鄱阳湖湿地植物生态系统结构及湖水位对其影响研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(06): 597 .
[3] 周国兵, 王式功. 重庆市主城区空气污染天气特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(11): 1345 .
[4] 梁涛, 史正涛, 刘志国. 昆明市街道灰尘粒度特征及其环境意义[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(1): 122 .
[5] 邵玉龙| 许有鹏| 马爽爽. 太湖流域城市化发展下水系结构与河网连通变化分析——以苏州市中心区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(10): 1167 .
[6] 叶磊, 周建中, 曾小凡, 张海荣, 卢鹏. 气候变化下SPEI指数在嘉陵江流域的干旱评估应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(06): 943 -948 .
[7] 蓝希, 刘小琼, 郭炎, 陈昆仑. “长江经济带”战略背景下武汉城市水环境承载力综合评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1345 .
[8] 侯雯嘉, 陈长青, 乔辉, 孙新素, 周曙东. 1980~2009年长江下游地区油菜冻害时空特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1375 .
[9] 芦鑫, 殷淑燕, 王水霞, 高涛涛. 秦岭南北地区农业气候资源时空变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1866 .
[10] 梅梦媛, 陈振杰, 张云倩, 张亚楠, . 居民活动空间与生态约束协调的城市开发边界划定方法——以长沙市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2472 -2480 .