长江流域资源与环境 >> 2019, Vol. 28 >> Issue (06): 1446-1459.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201906019

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

南昌市环境空气污染时空变化特征及影响因素研究

晏彩霞,周旋, 张华敏,黄娴,盛燕茹,聂明华,丁明军*   

  1. (江西师范大学地理与环境学院,鄱阳湖湿地与流域研究教育部重点实验室,江西 南昌 330022)
  • 出版日期:2019-06-20 发布日期:2019-06-20

Spatiotemporal Distribution of Air Pollution and Its Impacted Factors in Nanchang City

YAN Cai-xia, ZHOU Xuan, ZHANG Hua-min, HUANG Xian, #br# SHENG Yan-ru, NIE Ming-hua, DING Ming-jun   

  1. (School of Geography and Environment, Key Laboratory of Poyang Lake Wetland and Watershed Research, 
    Ministry of Education, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China)

  • Online:2019-06-20 Published:2019-06-20

摘要: 选取2014~2017年南昌市不同时间尺度AQI及主要空气污染物数据,利用GIS技术、神经网络分析、后向轨迹模型及地统计分析方法,分析了南昌市环境空气污染时空变化特征及影响因素。结果表明,南昌市近年来空气质量总体变化不大,空气质量等级以良为主,占全年比例为57%~61%。但首要污染物变化较大,即PM2.5比例显著下降,NO2和O3比例显著上升,PM10变化不大。南昌市空气污染季节变化显著,冬春季空气质量较差,以PM10、PM2.5污染为主,夏季空气质量最好,以O3污染为主。空气污染周变化以周末及周一污染较重、周四污染最轻,说明南昌市空气污染除了与群众出行习惯有关,还存在其他影响因素。南昌市空气质量日变化呈双峰型(9:00~11:00和20:00~22:00),主要受上、下班高峰期带来的交通尾气影响。南昌市空气污染空间变化呈典型的“郊区-市区”分布,其中AQI、PM10、PM2.5、SO2、NO2、CO值均以市区较高、郊区较低,而O3的空间分布规律正好相反,这主要与城区NOx排放较多,O3易与其迅速反应而消耗有关。后向轨迹聚类分析结果表明,来自本地的短轨迹气团占比高,对PM2.5、PM10、NO2、O3的影响大。气象因素上,PM2.5、PM10、NO2受相对湿度影响较大,O3受温度影响较大。

Abstract: Base on GIS, self-organizing map (SOM), back trajectory model and geostatistical method, this study investigates the spatiotemporal distribution of air pollution and its impacted factors in Nanchang City. For this purpose, the data of air quality index (AQI) and the main air pollutants in different time scales from 2014 to 2017 is selected, as well as the meteorological factors. Results show that the air quality of Nanchang City is not significantly improved in recent years. 51≤AQI≤100 is the main level of AQI with the ratios between 57% and 61%. But the primary pollutants are greatly changed, e.g. the number of polluted days of PM2.5 decrease, while the counterpart of NO2 and O3 increase. For seasonal variation, the air quality in Nanchang City is poor in winter and spring, with PM10 and PM2.5 as the primary pollutants. In comparison, the counterpart is good in summer, with O3 as the primary pollutant. The air quality is relatively bad on Monday and the weekends, and relatively good on Wednesdays and Thursday. It reveals that travel habit of people is not the only influence factor for the air quality in Nanchang City. The diurnal variation of air quality in Nanchang City shows a bimodal distribution peaked at 9:00-11:00 and 20:00-22:00, which is primarily related to the traffic exhaust during the rush hours. For spatial distribution, the air quality in Nanchang City is poor in the downtown area compared with that in the suburban area. Specifically, the concentrations of PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NO2, CO are higher in the downtown area. In contrary, O3 shows the higher concentration in the suburban area. Because there is more amount of NOx emission in the downtown area and O3 is easily consumed by rapid reaction with them. Back trajectories and cluster analysis suggest that the prevailing air masses were from the nearby area in Nanchang and PM10, PM2.5, NO2 and O3 pollution may mainly originate from these areas. Principal component analysis (PCA) demonstrates that the relative humidity and temperature is the main impact corresponding to the high concentration of PM2.5, PM10 and NO2 and the concentration of O3, respectively.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨德伟,陈治谏,倪华勇,蒋 莉,廖晓勇. 基于能值分析的四川省生态经济系统可持续性评估[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 303 -309 .
[2] 刘毅, 陶勇, 万开元, 张过师, 陈树森, 陈防. 丹江口库区坡耕地柑桔园不同覆盖方式下地表径流氮磷流失特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(11): 1340 .
[3] 吕 文 |杨桂山 |万荣荣. 不同植茶年龄茶园蒸散速率的日变化——以宜兴市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(11): 1370 .
[4] 陈鲜艳,周兵,钟海玲,柳艳菊. 2011年长江中下游春旱的气候特征分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(01): 139 .
[5] 邓晓军| 韩龙飞| 杨明楠| 于志慧| 张媛. 城市水足迹对比分析——以上海和重庆为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(02): 189 .
[6] 谢谦, 朱翔, 贺清云, 徐美. 洞庭湖区血吸虫病疫水人水相互作用关系及防控方案研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(04): 655 -663 .
[7] 童庆蒙 张露 张俊飚. 土地流转能否提升农民生活满意度?——来自湖北省江汉平原地区的经验证据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 0, (): 0 .
[8] 周晟吕, 李月寒, 胡 静, 封竞男. 基于问卷调查的上海市大气环境质量改善的支付意愿研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2419 -2424 .
[9] 屈小娥. 中国生态效率的区域差异及影响因素——基于时空差异视角的实证分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2673 -2683 .
[10] 谢五三, 吴 蓉, 丁小俊. 基于FloodArea模型的城市内涝灾害风险评估与预警[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2848 -2855 .