长江流域资源与环境 >> 2020, Vol. 29 >> Issue (1): 137-149.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202001013

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于RS-SVR模型的流域水资源脆弱性评价与预测研究——以黄河流域为例

陈  岩,冯亚中   

  1. (南京林业大学经济管理学院,江苏 南京 210037)
  • 出版日期:2020-01-20 发布日期:2020-03-24

Assessment and Prediction of Water Resources Vulnerability in River Basin Based on RS-SVR Model: A Case Study of the Yellow River Basin

CHEN Yan,  FENG Ya-hong   

  1.  (College of Economics and Management,  Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037,China)
  • Online:2020-01-20 Published:2020-03-24

摘要: 水资源脆弱性是衡量水资源系统在气候变化以及人类活动影响下的流域承载能力的重要标准,流域水资源脆弱性评价与预测是评估流域水安全状况、辨识未来水资源系统存在的问题的重要手段。该文首先构建了黄河流域水资源脆弱性评价指标体系,利用粗糙集(Rough Set,缩写为RS)方法对原始指标体系进行降维去除冗余属性。然后,将降维后的评价指标标准值作为 “评价样本”,运用支持向量机回归(Support Vector Regression,缩写为SVR)模型对流域水资源脆弱性进行评价。最后,设定未来3种不同气候模式与社会经济情景,对黄河流域水资源脆弱性进行情景预测。结果表明:黄河流域过去16年间整体水资源脆弱性等级已从Ⅴ级提升到Ⅳ级水平,未来情景1、情景2下流域整体水资源脆弱性将会好转,但仍处于Ⅳ级中度脆弱水平。未来水质脆弱性与灾害脆弱性提升较为明显,水量脆弱性没有显著改善,在情景3下将恶化到Ⅴ级中高脆弱。因此未来采取积极的人工调控措施能使得水质与灾害方面获得明显的提升,而水量脆弱性则成为制约未来流域整体水资源脆弱性的瓶颈。

Abstract: Water resources vulnerability is an important criterion to measure the carrying capacity of water resources system under the influence of climate change and human activities. And assessment and prediction of water resources vulnerability in river basins is an important means for assessing water security and identifying problems in future water resources systems. Firstly, the evaluation index system of water resources vulnerability in the Yellow River Basin is constructed, and rough set method is used to reduce the dimension of the original index system and remove redundant attributes. Second, the standard value of the dimension-reduced evaluation index is taken as the evaluation sample, and the support vector regression (SVR) model is used to evaluate the vulnerability of water resources in the basin. Finally, three different climate models and socio-economic scenarios are set for scenario prediction of water resources vulnerability in the Yellow River Basin. The results show that the water resources vulnerability of the Yellow River Basin has been raised from level Ⅴ to level Ⅳ in the past 16 years. The water resources vulnerability of the Yellow River Basin under scenario 1 and scenario 2 will be improved in the future, but it is still in the level Ⅳ of moderate vulnerability. In the future, the water quality vulnerability and disaster vulnerability will be improved obviously, and the water shortage vulnerability will not be improved significantly. Under scenario 3, the water quality vulnerability will deteriorate to grade Ⅴ medium-high vulnerability. Therefore, in the future, taking active control measures can make water quality and disaster vulnerability significantly improved, and water shortage vulnerability will become the bottleneck restricting the overall water resources vulnerability of future basins.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 彭长青,冯金飞,卞新民. 基于遗传算法和GIS的县域水田种植制度空间布局优化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 66 -70 .
[2] 王 军,陈振楼,许世远. 长江口滨岸带生态环境质量评价指标体系与评价模型[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(5): 659 -664 .
[3] 彭静,李翀,徐天宝. 论河流保护与修复的生态目标[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(1): 66 -71 .
[4] 李 娜,夏永久. 宁波城市基础设施现代化水平综合评价与预测[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 136 -141 .
[5] 李加林,许继琴,童亿勤,杨晓平,张殿发. 杭州湾南岸滨海平原土地利用/覆被空间格局变化分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 709 -713 .
[6] 胡明秀, 胡 辉, 王立兵. 武汉市工业“三废”污染状况计量模型研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 470 -474 .
[7] 张文广,胡远满, 刘 淼,杨兆平,常 禹,李秀珍,杨 孟,问青春, . 基于土地利用变化的生态服务价值损益估算——以岷江上游地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 821 .
[8] 马育军, 黄贤金, 肖思思, 王 舒. 基于DEA模型的区域生态环境建设绩效评价——以江苏省苏州市为例 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 769 .
[9] 陈 华,郭生练,郭海晋,徐高洪,徐德龙. 汉江流域1951~2003年降水气温时空变化趋势分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 340 -345 .
[10] 刘丛强 汪福顺 王雨春 王宝利. 河流筑坝拦截的水环境响应——来自地球化学的视角[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(4): 384 .