长江流域资源与环境 >> 2020, Vol. 29 >> Issue (2): 412-423.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202002014

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

江西省农用地生态效率时空差异及影响因素分析——基于面源污染、碳排放双重视角

黄和平,王智鹏


  

  1. (江西财经大学生态经济研究院,江西 南昌 330013)
  • 出版日期:2020-02-20 发布日期:2020-02-20

Spatial-temporal Differences and Influencing Factors of Agricultural Land Eco-efficiency in Jiangxi Province:Based on the Dual Perspective of Non-point Source Pollution and Carbon Emission

HUANG He-ping, WANG Zhi-peng   

  1. (Institute of Ecological Economics, Jiangxi University of Finance & Economics, Nanchang 330013, China)
  • Online:2020-02-20 Published:2020-02-20

摘要: 科学剖析农用地生态效率时空差异及影响机制,对实现农用地利用与资源环境协调发展以及制定农业可持续发展政策具有重要的理论与实践意义。将农用地面源污染、碳排放作为非期望产出纳入农用地生态效率评价指标体系,借助SBM-Undesirable模型对1990~2017年江西省农用地生态效率进行测度并对其时空差异特征进行分析,在此基础上运用Tobit模型探讨相关因素的影响机制。结果表明:(1)1990~2017年间江西省农用地生态效率呈现“先下降后上升”的变化趋势,均值为0.749,总体呈现上升的趋势;(2)各设区市农用地生态效率空间格局演变轨迹呈现先下降后上升的扁平“U”型特征,高效率地区由“连片”分布向“点状”分布再向“连片”分布变化,空间格局趋于非均衡化发展;(3)农村居民人均可支配收入、复种指数、农村劳动力文化程度和劳均播种面积对农用地生态效率产生显著正影响,城乡收入差距则产生显著负影响。最后,从优化资源要素配置、加强农业科技创新应用、健全农村土地流转制度、摒弃过度依赖资源要素投入与环境污染的粗放型发展模式、走“精耕细作”和可持续发展的农业生态文明发展道路等方面提出了提高农用地生态效率的政策建议。

Abstract: Land resources are the material basis for human survival and development, but the extensive land management mode brings a series of serious challenges: land resources are limited, non-point source pollution aggravated, the quality of agricultural land deteriorated, agricultural carbon emissions increased sharply, agricultural land conversion, etc. This development model at the expense of resources and environment has seriously restricted the sustainable development of agricultural economy. It is of great theoretical and practical significance to scientifically analyze the spatial-temporal differences and impact mechanism of agricultural land ecological efficiency for realizing the coordinated development of agricultural land use, resources and environment, and formulating sustainable agricultural development policies. In this paper, Jiangxi Province was taken as a typical case study area. First, inventory analysis and carbon emission coefficient method were used to calculate the pollution and carbon emissions of agricultural surface sources,and then it was incorporated into the SBM-Undesirable model of undesirable output. Secondly, the ecological efficiency of agricultural land was quantitatively measured and the spatial-temporal pattern of the study area was revealed in Jiangxi Province and its districts and cities from 1990 to 2017. Finally, it used the Tobit regression model to discuss the influence mechanism of relevant factors. The results showed that: (1) From 1990 to 2016, the ecological efficiency of agricultural land in Jiangxi Province showed a “first decreased and then increased” trend, with an average value of 0.749, showing an overall upward trend;(2) The spatial pattern of eco-efficiency of agricultural land in Jiangxi Province was characterized by a flat “V” feature that decreased first and then increased. The high efficiency regions changed from “serial” distribution to “spot” distribution and then to “serial” distribution, and the spatial pattern tended to be unbalanced; (3) The per capita disposable income of rural residents, multiple cropping index, cultural proportion of rural labor force above senior high school and per capita sowing area had significant positive effects on the ecological efficiency of agricultural land in Jiangxi Province, while the income gap between urban and rural areas had significant negative effects. Finally, the paper putting forward some suggestions to improve the ecological efficiency of agricultural land from the aspects of optimizing the allocation of resources, strengthening the innovation and application of agricultural science and technology, perfecting the rural land circulation system, abandoning the extensive development model of excessive dependence on resources and factors input and environmental pollution, taking the “intensive cultivation” and sustainable development of agricultural ecological civilization. Meanwhile, there are still some somewhat limitations in this study: (1) In the aspect of unexpected output, the loss of agricultural land ecological efficiency caused by unexpected output, such as rural domestic sewage or rural industrial wastewater discharge pollution, has not been considered; (2) The differences of initial land quality and soil fertility among different regions have not been included in the evaluation system of agricultural land ecological efficiency; (3) In the analysis of impact mechanism, the micro-factors such as farmers’ willingness to adopt agricultural science and technology, pollution prevention and control are not included in the analysis. The spatial and temporal differences of agricultural land ecological efficiency and its influencing mechanism are the result of many factors, which provide an important direction for further research in the future.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 段学花 王兆印 余国安. 以底栖动物为指示物种对长江流域水生态进行评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(3): 241 -247 .
[2] 许朗|黄莺|刘爱军. 基于主成分分析的江苏省水资源承载力研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(12): 1468 .
[3] 刘 钢 | 王慧敏 | 仇 蕾. 湖域工业初始排污权合作配置体系构建——以太湖流域为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(10): 1223 .
[4] 姚芳芳 |冯丽丽 |杨颂宇 |王希. 亚热带常见树种幼苗对酸雨的生理响应及敏感性综合评判[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(02): 200 .
[5] 张亚男, 甘义群, 李小倩, 刘运德, 于凯, 张彬. 2013年长江丰水期河水化学特征及控制因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(04): 645 -654 .
[6] 吴殿鸣, 邵大伟. 基于最佳尺度的城市扩张特征研究——以苏州中心城区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1937 -1946 .
[7] 沈雪, 张露, 张俊飚, 骆兰翎. 稻农低碳生产行为影响因素与引导策略——基于人际行为改进理论的多组比较分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2042 -2052 .
[8] 马坤, 唐晓岚, 刘思源, 王奕文, 任宇杰, 刘小涵. 长江流域国家级保护地空间分布特征及其国家公园廊道空间策略研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2053 -2069 .
[9] 曾 刚, 杨舒婷, 王丰龙, . 长江经济带城市协同发展能力研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2641 -2650 .
[10] 梁志会, 张露, 张俊飚, Jorge Ruiz Menjivar, 刘勇. 小农发展气候智慧型农业的效率与成本改进:倡导农地流转还是发展社会服务?[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(05): 1164 -1175 .