长江流域资源与环境 >> 2020, Vol. 29 >> Issue (3): 643-653.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202003011

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于“重要性-敏感性-冲突性”的陕北生态保护重点区域辨识

李  云1,2,张艳芳1,2* ,田  茂1,2,尹礼唱3,王  茹1,2   

  1. (1.陕西师范大学地理科学与旅游学院,陕西 西安 710119;2.地理学国家级实验教学示范中心(陕西师范大学),陕西 西安 710119;3.长安大学地球科学与资源学院,陕西 西安 7100119)
  • 出版日期:2020-03-20 发布日期:2020-03-20

Identification of Key Ecological Protection Areas Based on the“Importance-Sensitivity-Conflict” Framework in Northern Shaanxi Province

LI Yun1,2,ZHANG Yan-fang1, 2,TIAN Mao1, 2,YIN Li-chang3,WANG Ru1,2   

  1. (1.School of Geography and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China;2.National Demonstration Center for Experimental Geography Education(Shaanxi Normal University), Xi’an 710119,China; 3.School of Earth Science and Resources, Chang’an University, Xi’an 7100119, China )
  • Online:2020-03-20 Published:2020-03-20

摘要: 摘  要:在城镇化快速发展背景下,生态环境遭到破坏的风险增加,这必将影响经济社会与生态系统的稳定与安全。基于RS和GIS相关技术,从生态系统服务重要性、生态敏感性和空间冲突3个方面,采用NPP 定量指标评价法、空间冲突测度评估法和析取运算法,对陕北生态环境情况进行综合评估。在“重要性-敏感性-冲突性”框架下,辨识陕北生态保护重点区域,提出一定管控建议。结果表明:(1)陕北生态保护重点区域主要分布于陕北南部的黄龙山、子午岭地区、中部黄土丘陵沟壑区和北部榆林市境内的毛乌素沙漠敏感区。(2)延安市南部生态高价值与高敏感性并存,同时是空间冲突热点区,生态风险高。(3)延安市空间冲突水平相比于榆林市较强烈。能源开采活动、地形起伏、道路扩张及(生态工程)地表破碎性影响,给当地生态环境带来压力和风险。“重要性-敏感性-冲突性”框架的构建可为生态保护提供新思路,客观辨识出生态重点保护区域,对协调城镇开发建设和生态环境保护之间的矛盾及政策参考方面具有重要意义。

Abstract: Abstract:Under the background of rapid urbanization, the risk of damage to the ecological environment will increase, which will definitely affect the stability and security of the social economy and ecosystem. Based on RS and GIS, this study used the evaluation methods of NPP quantitative index, spatial conflict measurement and disjunction algorithm to comprehensively evaluate the ecological environment in Northern Shaanxi from the following aspects: ecosystem service importance, ecological sensitivity and spatial conflict. Under the framework of “Importance-Sensitivity-Conflict”, we identified key areas of ecological protection in Northern Shaanxi and put forward management recommendations. Results show that: (1) The key ecological protection region in northern Shaanxi were mainly distributed in Huanglong Mountain, Ziwuling area, the Loess Hilly and Gully Region in the Middle and Maowusu Desert; (2) High value and high sensitivity of ecosystem was found in Yan’an city, which was also a hotspot of space conflict with high ecological risks; (3)The level of spatial conflict in Yan’an City was stronger than that in Yulin City. Energy exploitation activities, topographic fluctuations, road expansion and ecological engineers brought pressure and ecological risk to the local ecological environment. Our study showed that the "Importance-Sensitivity-Conflict" framework could provide a new way of idea for ecological protection and identification of the key ecological protection areas. It is of great significance not only to coordinate the contradiction between the construction of towns and ecological environment protection, but also to identify the key ecological protection areas, which will provide meaningful policy reference.
Key words:importance of ecosystem services; ecological sensitivity; spatial conflict;key areas of ecological protection

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 陈鲜艳, 张强, 叶殿秀, 廖要明, 祝昌汉, 邹旭恺. 三峡库区局地气候变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(1): 47 .
[2] 陈 勇,陈国阶,杨定国. 岷江上游聚落分布规律及其生态特征——以四川理县为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 72 -77 .
[3] 解晓南,许朋柱,秦伯强. 太湖流域苏锡常地区地面沉降若干问题探析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(1): 125 -131 .
[4] 刘 健,陈 星,彭恩志,周学东. 气候变化对江苏省城市系统用电量变化趋势的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 546 -550 .
[5] 彭长青,冯金飞,卞新民. 基于遗传算法和GIS的县域水田种植制度空间布局优化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 66 -70 .
[6] 刘爱霞,刘正军,王 静. 基于PCA变换和神经元网络分类方法的中国森林制图研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 19 -24 .
[7] 郑明媚,李满春,毛 亮,黎韶光. GIS支持的县域人口迁移空间模型研究——以浙江省临安市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 281 -286 .
[8] 李宽意,刘正文,王春忠,王传海,史加达,胡耀辉. 低溶解氧对苦草生长的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(5): 670 -673 .
[9] 李书恒, 郭 伟, 施晓冬, 朱大奎. 舟山群岛海洋环境资源及其开发利用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 425 .
[10] 杨 琳,何 芳,陈天明. 基于弹性理念的城市用地开发战略研究——以上海市宝山区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 360 .