长江流域资源与环境 >> 2021, Vol. 30 >> Issue (6): 1308-1316.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202106003

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

排水权交易定价方法及案例研究 ——以秦淮河流域为例

蒋昀辰,黄贤金*,徐晓晔   

  1. (南京大学地理与海洋科学学院,江苏 南京 210023)
  • 出版日期:2021-06-20 发布日期:2021-06-30

Pricing Method and Case Study on the Cost of Drainage Rights: A Case Study of the Qinhuai River Basin

JIANG Yun-chen, HUANG Xian-jin, XU Xiao-ye   

  1. (School of Geographic and Oceanographic Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023,China)
  • Online:2021-06-20 Published:2021-06-30

摘要: 在城市扩张和资源稀缺的矛盾中,在水患灾害和经济发展的冲突下,明确排水权产权化,推进排水权交易市场化,保证排水权定价合理化是治理水患灾害的新思路。首次提出排水权交易的制度保障、四项排水权交易定价原则和两个层次的排水权定价理论。基于洪涝灾害的损失评估方法和防汛设施的建设成本来进行排水权成本的计算,并以此为基础建立了洪涝损失元模型,进一步形成了排水权成本模型,并在整体最优的约束条件下,提出了交易策略和定价模型,从理论上证明了排水权交易对防汛排水效率提高的推动作用。最后应用社会经济统计数据空间展布方法,结合南京市、句容市2016年的社会经济数据和同年7月汛期的水文站点水位数据,计算出当时的句容市和南京市的排水权平均价格分别为5.97和18.30元/m3,证实了排水权交易在实践中的可行性。

Abstract: In the contradictions between urban expansion and scarcity of resources, and between flood disasters and economic development, it is a new method of flood disaster management to clarify the property rights of drainage rights, promote the marketization of drainage right trading, and guarantee the rationalization of drainage right pricing. This paper put forward for the first time the institutional guarantee of drainage right trading, four pricing principles of drainage right trading, and two levels of drainage right pricing theories. Based on the loss assessment method of flood disasters and the construction cost of flood control facilities, this paper calculated the cost of drainage right and established the meta-model of the flood losses. This paper further formed the cost model of drainage right, and proposed the trading strategy and pricing model under the overall optimal constraints, which theoretically proved the contribution of drainage right trading to the improvement of drainage efficiency of flood control. Finally, with the application of the spatial display simulation of socio-economic statistics, and combining water level data from hydrometric stations during the flood season in July 2016 with the socio-economic data of Nanjing and Jurong in the same year, this paper calculated that the average drainage right prices of Nanjing and Jurong at that time were respectively 18.30 and 5.97 yuan/m3,which confirmed the feasibility of drainage right trading in practice.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 罗能生, 王玉泽.彭郁, 李建明. 长江中游城市群生态效率的空间关系及其协同提升机制研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1349 .
[2] 张梦薇, 吕成文. 丰乐河流域表层土壤有机碳空间变异特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1420 .
[3] 韦汝虹, 金 李, 方 达. 基于GIS的中国城市房地产泡沫的空间传染性分析——以2006~2014年35个大中城市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1967 -1977 .
[4] 张丽琴, 渠丽萍, 吕春艳, 李 玲. 基于空间格局视角的武汉市土地生态系统服务价值研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1988 -1997 .
[5] 田雨 周宝同 付伟 王蓉. 2000-2015年山地城市土地利用景观格局动态演变研究—以重庆市渝北区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[6] 曾源源, 胡守庚, 瞿诗进, . 长江中游经济带交通区位条件变化与建设用地扩张时空耦合规律[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2651 -2662 .
[7] 梁辉 王春凯. 201904产业发展对城市蔓延影响的差异性分析—以长江经济带104个城市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[8] 杨远琴, 任 平, 洪步庭, . 基于生态安全的三峡库区重庆段土地利用冲突识别[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 322 -332 .
[9] 王 倩, 王云琦, 马 超, 王 彬, 李一凡. 缙云山针阔混交林碳通量变化特征及影响因子研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(03): 565 -576 .
[10] 卢德彬, 毛婉柳, 杨东阳, 赵佳楠. 基于多源遥感数据的中国PM2.5变化趋势与影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(03): 651 -660 .