长江流域资源与环境 >> 2021, Vol. 30 >> Issue (9): 2102-2114.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202109006

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江经济带矿产资源开发环境保护政策研究——基于SWOT-AHP和模糊TOPSIS法

方传棣1,成金华1,赵鹏大2   

  1. (1.中国地质大学经济与管理学院,湖北 武汉 430074;2.中国地质大学资源学院,湖北 武汉 430074)
  • 出版日期:2021-09-20 发布日期:2021-09-27

Research on the Environmental Protection Policy for the Development of Mineral Resources in the Yangtze River Economic Belt:Based on SWOT-AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Method

FANG Chuan-di 1, CHENG Jin-hua 1, ZHAO Peng-da 2   

  1. (1.China University of Geosciences, College of Economics and Management, Wuhan 430074, China;2.China University of Geosciences, College of Resources, Wuhan 430074, China)
  • Online:2021-09-20 Published:2021-09-27

摘要: 适宜的战略决策是促进矿产资源开发和生态环境保护协调发展的重要支撑。为评价长江经济带矿业绿色发展战略的政策优先性,基于优势,劣势,机会,威胁分析确定政策的影响因素并确定10种替代方案,再通过AHP法得出权重,最后通过模糊TOPSIS法得出替代方案的最优排序。结果表明:10种替代方案中,保证生态保护红线内矿业权有序退出的优先度最高,其次为严格落实矿山生态环境损害赔偿制度和优先开采清洁与新兴矿产资源,而提高矿业产业集中度相较于其他方案的优先度最低,同时通过敏感性分析验证了模糊TOPSIS法的可靠性。为短期内重塑矿产资源开发利用布局,提高矿产资源开发的保障能力与现代化治理能力,以及中长期构建矿产资源开发与生态环境协调发展,建议将保证生态保护红线内矿业权有序退出作为目前长江经济带矿产资源开发生态环境保护战略的主导方向。

Abstract: Appropriate policy plans are an important support to promote the coordinated development of mineral resources development and ecological environmental protection. In order to evaluate the policy priority of the Yangtze River Economic Belt’s mining green development strategy, this paper determines the influencing factors of the policy and identifies 10 alternatives based on the analysis of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats(SWOT)analysis, Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP), and Fuzzy Technique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution(Fuzzy-TOPSIS). At the same time, AHP method is mainly used to determine the weight of SWOT elements, and the fuzzy TOPSIS method ranks alternatives. Finally, the reliability of the fuzzy TOPSIS method was verified by sensitivity analysis. The results of the study reveal that among the 10 alternatives, the highest priority is to ensure the orderly withdrawal of mining rights within the ecological protection red line. The second is strictly implement the compensation system for mine ecological environment damage and the third is prioritize the exploitation of clean and emerging mineral resources. Increasing the concentration of the mining industry has the lowest priority compared to other programs. In order to re-plan the development and utilization of mineral resources in the short term, while improving the guarantee and capacity for governance, And the coordinated development of mineral resources development and ecological environment in the medium and long term, it is suggested to ensure the orderly withdrawal of mining rights within the ecological protection red line as the leading direction of the current ecological environment protection strategy for mineral resources development in the Yangtze River Economic Belt.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李建豹, 黄贤金, 孟 浩, 周 艳, 徐国良, 吴常艳. “十二五”时期中国碳排放强度累积目标完成率分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1655 .
[2] 熊鸿斌, 周凌燕. 基于PSR-灰靶模型的巢湖环湖防洪治理工程生态环境影响评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1977 -1987 .
[3] 李嘉译, 匡鸿海, 谭 超, 王佩佩. 长江经济带城市扩张的时空特征与生态响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2153 -2161 .
[4] 唐子珺, 陈龙, 覃军, 郑翔. 武汉市一次污染过程的局地流场和边界层结构的数值模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2540 -2547 .
[5] 王东香, 张一鸣, 王锐诚, 赵炳炎, 张志麒, 黄咸雨, . 神农架大九湖泥炭地孔隙水溶解有机碳特征及其影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2568 -2577 .
[6] 王海力, 韩光中, 谢贤健. 基于DEA模型的西南地区耕地利用效率时空格局演变及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2784 -2795 .
[7] 汪聪聪, 王益澄, 马仁锋, 王静敏. 经济集聚对雾霾污染影响的空间计量研究——以长三角洲地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 1 -11 .
[8] 赵树成, 张展羽, 夏继红, 杨洁, 盛丽婷, 唐丹, 陈晓安, . 鄱阳湖滨岸土壤磷素吸附特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 166 -174 .
[9] 阮甜, 查芊郁, 杨茹, 高超. 全球升温1.5℃和2.0℃对长江寸滩站以上流域径流的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 407 -415 .
[10] 邵祎婷, 何毅, 穆兴民, 高鹏, 赵广举, 孙文义, . 秦巴山区降雨侵蚀力时空变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 416 -425 .