长江流域资源与环境 >> 2021, Vol. 30 >> Issue (12): 3004-3016.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202112019

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

社会互动促进了农户水土保持技术采用吗?

高天志,陆迁*   

  1. (西北农林科技大学经济管理学院,陕西 杨凌 712100)
  • 出版日期:2021-12-20 发布日期:2022-01-07

Does Social Interaction Promote the Adoption of Farmers′ Soil  and Water Conservation Technologies?

GAO Tian-zhi,LU Qian   


  1. (College of Economics and Management, Northwest A & F University, Yangling 712100, China)
  • Online:2021-12-20 Published:2022-01-07

摘要: 基于黄土高原区1 195份农户调研数据,运用探索因子、二元Logistic回归和KHB方法,构建并检验社会互动、信任对水土保持技术采用的分析框架和影响机制,以期为推动水土保持技术的广泛应用,为实现生态保护和高质量发展提供参考。研究发现:(1)社会互动5个维度直接正向影响农户采用水土保持技术,对农业技术采用率提高、改善生态环境发挥重要作用;(2)社会互动通过人际信任、网络信任和政府信任间接正向影响农户水土保持技术采用;(3)信任的总间接效应(0.735 3)大于社会互动的直接效应(0.576 3),其中,人际信任的间接效应值最大(0.394 7),政府信任次之(0.220 3),网络信任最小(0.120 3)。研究深化农户与水土保持技术采用行为关系的理解,建议相关部门在农业技术推广和实施过程中,应充分发挥社会互动与信任的积极作用,有针对性地制定目标政策。

Abstract: Based on the survey data of 1195 farmers in the Loess Plateau, the analysis framework of social interaction-trust-soil conservation technology was constructed. The exploration factor, binary logistic regression and KHB method were used to analyze and test the role and influence of social interaction on farmers' adoption of soil and water conservation technology. mechanism. The study found that: (1)The five dimensions of social interaction directly affect farmers' adoption of soil and water conservation technologies, and play an important role in improving the adoption rate of agricultural technology and improving the ecological environment; (2)Social interaction indirectly affects farmers through interpersonal trust, network trust and government trust. The use of soil and water conservation technology; (3)The total indirect effect of trust (0.735 3) is greater than the direct effect of social interaction (0.576 3), in which the interpersonal trust has the largest indirect effect value (0.394 7), the government trust second (0.220 3), the network trust is minimal (0.120 3). The study deepened the understanding of the relationship between farmers and the adoption of soil and water conservation technology, and suggested that the relevant departments should give full play to the positive role of social interaction and trust when formulating targeted policies in economic and social development and ecological security.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张鑫, 陈志刚. 经济增长激励、官员异质性与城市工业污染:以长三角地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1314 .
[2] 郭政, 董平, 陆玉麒, 黄群芳, 马颖忆. 长三角集装箱港口体系演化及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1340 .
[3] 蓝希, 刘小琼, 郭炎, 陈昆仑. “长江经济带”战略背景下武汉城市水环境承载力综合评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1345 .
[4] 罗能生, 王玉泽.彭郁, 李建明. 长江中游城市群生态效率的空间关系及其协同提升机制研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1349 .
[5] 刘钢, 刘坤琳, 汪玮茜, 赵爽. 水质感知视角下水库移民满意度分析——基于有序逻辑回归的实证研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1355 .
[6] 戢晓峰, 刘丁硕. 基于3D理论与SEM的县域交通可达性与空间贫困的耦合机制[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1360 .
[7] 张大鹏, 曹卫东, 姚兆钊, 岳洋, 任亚文. 上海大都市区物流企业区位分布特征及其演化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1365 .
[8] 佘颖, 刘耀彬. 国内外绿色发展制度演化的历史脉络及启示[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1370 .
[9] 侯雯嘉, 陈长青, 乔辉, 孙新素, 周曙东. 1980~2009年长江下游地区油菜冻害时空特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1375 .
[10] 姚琳, 沈竞, 温新龙, 高超. WRF模式参数化方案对江西山地风电场的风模拟研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1380 .