长江流域资源与环境 >> 2022, Vol. 31 >> Issue (1): 113-123.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202201011

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

贵州省不同地貌类型下植被物候时空变化及其对气候的响应

任荣仪, 贺中华*,夏传花, 张  浪, 杨铭珂   

  1. (贵州师范大学地理与环境科学学院,贵州 贵阳 550025)
  • 出版日期:2022-01-20 发布日期:2022-02-09

Temporal and Spatial Changes of Vegetation Phenology and Its Response to Climate in Guizhou Province Under Different Landform Types

REN Rong-yi, HE Zhong-hua, XIA Chuan-hua, ZHANG Lang, YANG Ming-ke   

  1. ( School of Geographic and Environmental Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550025,China)
  • Online:2022-01-20 Published:2022-02-09

摘要: 为研究贵州省物候变化特征及其影响因素,基于2002~2017年MCD12Q2数据和气候资料,采用数理统计方法对贵州省植被变化及其对气候变化的响应进行探讨。结果显示:(1)贵州省植被生长始期(SOS)呈现出由东向西逐渐延迟的经向空间分布特征;在各地貌区中,SOS相对较早的是Ⅰ区,而相对较晚的是Ⅵ区。生长末期(EOS)较早的地区相对集中于Ⅱ、Ⅴ、Ⅵ区的西部地区,而较晚集中于Ⅴ区的东部及北部和IV的西南部。生长季长度(LOS)偏短的地区集中分布于III、Ⅴ区的西部及Ⅵ区,LOS较长的地区集中分布于Ⅰ、Ⅳ区的西部及Ⅴ区的东部。(2)贵州省多年平均SOS为第86 d, Ⅵ区最晚, Ⅰ区最早。多年平均EOS为第333 d,其中 Ⅴ区最晚, Ⅱ区最早。16年平均LOS为247 d, Ⅳ区最长, Ⅵ区最短。(3)SOS平均以4.2  d·(10a)-1的速率不显著提前;Ⅵ区提早速率最大;Ⅳ区提早速率最小。EOS以3.9 d·(10a)-1的速率不显著推迟,Ⅴ区的推迟速率最大,Ⅱ区推迟速率最小。LOS以2.8 d·(10a)-1的速率延长;Ⅵ区延长速率最大,Ⅰ区延长速率最小。(4)贵州省物候期受海拔的影响,海拔每上升 1 000 m 会导致SOS推迟15 d,EOS提前4 d,LOS缩短20 d左右。(5)SOS与6月气温之间存在极显著负相关性,EOS与9月降水存在显著正相关。研究结果发现了贵州省植被物候的变化特征、变化趋势和变化速率,分析发现物候的变化和海拔、6月气温和9月降水存在密切联系。

Abstract: In order to study the characteristics of phenological change and its influencing factors in Guizhou province, based on MCD12Q2 data and climatic data from 2002 to 2017, mathematical statistics were used to discuss the vegetation change and its response to climate change in Guizhou Province. The results showed that: (1) The initial period of vegetation growth (SOS) in Guizhou province presented a meridional spatial distribution characteristic of gradually delayed from east to west; Among all geomorphologic regions, SOS in region Ⅰ relatively early, while Ⅵ relatively late. The early stage of growth (EOS) was relatively concentrated in the west of region Ⅱ, Ⅴ and Ⅵ, while the late stage was concentrated in the east and north of region Ⅴ and the southwest of region IV. The areas with relatively short growing season length (LOS) were concentrated in the west of region Ⅲ and Ⅴ,as well as Ⅵ region, while the longer LOS area was concentrated in the western and eastern parts of region Ⅰ, Ⅳ and V. (2) The multi-year average SOS in Guizhou province was the 86th day, while zone Ⅵ was the latest and zone Ⅰ was the earliest. The multi-year average EOS was the 333th days, with zone Ⅴ being the latest and zone Ⅱ the earliest. The 16-year average was 247 days in LOS, the longest in zone Ⅳ and the shortest in zone Ⅵ. (3) SOS was not significantly advanced at an average rate of 4.2 d·(10a)-1; Ⅵ zone had the maximum early speed; Area Ⅳ had the lowest early rate. EOS was not significantly delayed at a rate of 3.9 d·(10a)-1, with the maximum delay rate in region Ⅴ and the minimum delay rate in region Ⅱ. LOS extended at a rate of 2.8 d·(10a)-1; The elongation rate was the highest in region Ⅵ and the lowest in region I. (4) The phenological period of Guizhou province was affected by altitude. Every 1 000 m rised in altitude lead to a delay of 15 days for SOS, 4 days for EOS, and about 20 days for LOS. (5) There was a very significant negative correlation between SOS and temperature in June, and a significant positive correlation between EOS and precipitation in September. The results showed that the change characteristics, trend and rate of vegetation phenology in Guizhou province were closely related to altitude, temperature in June and precipitation in September.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张映雪, 王瑞, 屈霄, 夏文彤, 辛未, 郭传波, 陈宇顺.  

不同鱼类养殖方式对长江中游湖泊浮游植物群落的影响及其季节动态 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2260 -2269 .

[2] 高洁芝, 郑华伟, 刘友兆. 基于熵权TOPSIS模型的土地利用多功能性诊断[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2496 -2504 .
[3] 邱 宇, 陈英姿, 饶清华, 林秀珠, 陈文花. 基于排污权的闽江流域跨界生态补偿研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2839 -2847 .
[4] 郭强 叶许春 孟元可 樊龙凤. 基于IHA/RVA法的近年来鄱阳湖生态水位变异研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[5] 张媛媛 袁奋强 刘东皇 陈利馥. 产业生态化水平的测度及其影响因素研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[6] 黄晓慧, 王礼力, 陆迁. 资本禀赋对农户水土保持技术价值认知的影响——以黄土高原区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 222 -230 .
[7] 郭贯成, 彭紫新, 周志伟. 工业企业类型对工业用地利用效率的影响研究——基于企业类型宏观视角的分类 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 241 -249 .
[8] 杨 斌, 王占岐, 姚小薇, 张利国. 鄂西北山区土地利用的地形梯度效应与空间结构特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 313 -321 .
[9] 胡慧芝, 王建力, 王 勇, 龙晓泳. 1990~2015年长江流域县域粮食生产与粮食安全时空格局演变及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 359 -367 .
[10] 胡继亮, 熊自洁, 张悦, 高婷. 自然灾害水平对农户投保意愿的影响分析——基于湖北微观调查数据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 483 -492 .