长江流域资源与环境 >> 2022, Vol. 31 >> Issue (9): 2011-2021.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202209013

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

智慧治水、公众参与对水环境治理影响研究——基于浙江“五水共治”的调查

张宁1, 张澜1, 刘聪1, 陆文聪2
  

  1. (1.杭州电子科技大学管理学院,浙江 杭州 310018;2.浙江大学公共管理学院,浙江 杭州 310027)
  • 出版日期:2022-09-20 发布日期:2022-09-29

Study on the Influence of Smart Water and Public Participation on Water Environment Governance: Based on the Investigation of “Five Water Joint Governance” in Zhejiang Province

ZHANG Ning1,ZHANG Lan1, LIU Cong1, LU Wen-cong2   

  1. (1.School of Management,Hangzhou Dianzi University,Hangzhou 310018,China;2.School of Management,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310027,China)
  • Online:2022-09-20 Published:2022-09-29

摘要: 智慧治水是一种“智慧+合作治理”的新型管理模式,由于公众参与缺失,智慧治水服务与社会公众诉求还存在较大差距,尚未达到水环境治理的预期效果,公众参与意愿与实际行为还存在着明显的差异。研究基于浙江“五水共治”的社会调查,运用多元Logistic模型从个人、家庭、职业和社区四个行为环境特征,实证分析了智慧治水背景下的社会公众参与水环境治理的意愿、行为及影响因素,通过智慧治水和公众参与的有效融合,来全面实现水环境智慧治理的共享机制。结果表明:(1)公众文化程度越高,对智慧治水信息化平台建设支持率越高,参与水环境治理的意愿也会越强烈,公众参与度也会增加;(2)家庭用水依赖度、家庭信息服务消费指数对公众参与水环境治理的影响成正比,而家庭居住环境与公众参与意愿却成反比;(3)政府机关、事业单位及水务行业等网络化程度更高的职业是公众参与智慧治水的主要社会力量;(4)社区经济水平与公众参与成反比,社区智慧治水的信息传播方式对公众参与意愿的影响较大,但实际参与行为并不明显。在此结论基础上提出了政府主导的智慧治水多元主体协同治理的公众参与模式,加大政府激励政策,努力开发公众参与意愿,全面推进智慧治水平台建设,促进公众参与的途径和方式方法,保障公众参与水环境智慧治理的激励公平性和创造性。

Abstract: As a new management mode of "wisdom + cooperative governance", due to the lack of public participation, there is still a big gap between the services of intelligent water management and the demands of the public, and the expected effect of intelligent water environment governance has not been achieved. At the same time, there is a big gap between the public's willingness to participate and the actual behavior. Based on the social survey of "five-water joint governance" in Zhejiang province, Multiple Logistic model is used to empirically analyze the public's willingness to participate in water environmental governance and its influencing factors in the context of intelligent water governance from the perspectives of individual, family, occupation and community behavioral environment characteristics. Through the effective integration of intelligent water control and social management, the information sharing mechanism of water environment governance can be fully realized. The final research results show: (1) The higher the education level, the higher the support for the intelligent information platform, the stronger the public's willingness to participate in the smart water. (2) The influence of household water dependence and household information service consumption index on public participation intention was significantly positively correlated, but the change of household living environment was negatively correlated. (3) The public working in government agencies, public institutions and more networked industries, such as the water industry, is the main force to participate in water environment governance. (4) The district economic level is inversely proportional to the public's willingness to participate, and the communication mode of community water control culture has a greater impact on the public's willingness to participate. On the basis of this conclusion, it is proposed to actively publicize the culture of smart water management, explore the smart ways of public participation, improve the data sharing mechanism of smart water management, and guarantee the fairness of public participation in water management through the market embedding of smart water management.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 卢德彬 毛婉柳 杨东阳 赵佳楠. 基于多源遥感数据的中国PM2.5变化趋势与影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[2] 王凯, 王玉杰, 王彬, 张守红, 王云琦, 王晨沣. 黄壤坡面土壤分离速率研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2114 -2121 .
[3] 吴浪, 周廷刚, 温莉, 刘晓璐, 朱晓波. 基于遥感数据的PM2.5与城市化的时空关系研究——以成渝城市群为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2142 -2152 .
[4] 马小亮, 刘桂民, 吴晓东, 徐海燕, 叶琳琳, 张晓兰. 三江源高寒草甸下溪流溶解性有机碳的季节性输移特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2387 -2394 .
[5] 苏 芳, 郑亚萍, 阚立娜, 蔡 莎. 基于CVM调查法评估城市公共绿地服务价值 ——以西部省会城市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2434 -2442 .
[6] 潘超, 周驰, 苗滕, 刘林峰, 高健, 焦一滢, 李祝, 张佳敏, 王卉君, 徐德雄. 长江流域鄂西四河流大型底栖动物群落结构特征及水质生物学评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2529 -2539 .
[7] 朱立一, 何伟, 朱璧然, . 纳米二氧化硅和铅复合暴露对 斑马鱼幼鱼甲状腺内分泌系统的毒性影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2588 -2596 .
[8] 胡兴坤, 高 雷, 杨 浩, 刘绍平, 陈大庆, 段辛斌 . 长江中游黄石江段鱼类早期资源现状[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 60 -67 .
[9] 胡晓, 余英俊, 魏永才, 洪亮, 张永年, 石小涛, 吴睿. 基于过鱼效果评估的涵洞鱼道堰式挡板性能研究与分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 134 -143 .
[10] 秦立, 付宇文, 吴起鑫, 安艳玲, 刘瑞禄, 吕婕梅, 吴振宇. 赤水河流域土地利用结构对氮素输出的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 175 -183 .