长江流域资源与环境 >> 2023, Vol. 32 >> Issue (3): 487-497.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202303004

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

湖北大别山区生态系统水源涵养功能遥感评估

孙翔宇1,2,王立辉2*,李扬3,杨启池2.4,吴兆福1,高飞1,路利杰2,4,肖飞2,凌峰2
  

  1. (1.合肥工业大学土木与水利工程学院,安徽 合肥 230009;2. 中国科学院精密测量科学与技术创新研究院,环境与灾害监测评估湖北省重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430077;3. 湖北省生态环境科学研究院(省生态环境工程评估中心),湖北 武汉 430072;4. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049)
  • 出版日期:2023-03-20 发布日期:2023-04-19

Remote Sensing Assessment of the Water Conservation Function of Ecological #br# System in Dabieshan Mountain Area of Hubei Province

SUN Xiang-yu1,2, WANG Li-hui2, LI Yang3, YANG Qi-chi2,4, WU Zhao-fu1, GAO Fei1, LU Li-jie2,4, XIAO Fei2, LING Feng2   

  1. (1.College of Civil Engineering,Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China; 2. Key Laboratory for Environment
     and Disaster Monitoring and Evaluation of Hubei, Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology, 
    Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430077, China; 3. Hubei Provincial Academy of Eco-environmental Sciences
     (Hubei Provincial Eco-Environmental Engineering Assessment Center), Wuhan 430072, China;4. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
  • Online:2023-03-20 Published:2023-04-19

摘要: 湖北大别山区是长江中游和淮河中下游重要的水源补给区,也是我国中部地区重要的生态屏障,开展其水源涵养功能评估可以为区域生态保护和生态规划提供重要基础数据。以湖北大别山区为研究区,在获取高精度精细生态系统类型数据基础上,基于水量平衡模型评估水源涵养量,分析其空间分布特征及生态系统类型、海拔和坡度等因子对水源涵养功能的影响。结果表明:(1)研究区2020年水源涵养深度均值为 292 mm,水源涵养总量为43.57×108  m3,空间上呈现东强西弱的特征;(2)水源涵养总量贡献较大的是森林和灌丛,贡献率占比超过70%。单位面积水源涵养能力较强的为常绿阔叶林和常绿阔叶灌丛,分别为620.63和539.51 mm;(3)中低海拔(100~300 m)区域水源涵养总量占比最大,为42.86%,高海拔(1 000~1 700 m)区域单位面积水源涵养量较高,为711.79 mm,缓坡(5°~15°)地区对水源涵养总量贡献最大,为47.80%;(4)水源涵养极重要区域占研究区总面积的6.56%,主要集中在东部的九资河镇、温泉镇、青石镇等;重要区域占12.08%,主要集中在南部英山县草盘地镇、石头咀镇和罗田县九资河镇的山地。研究结果可为湖北大别山区生态环境保护、生态修复规划与生态空间管制提供重要数据支撑。

Abstract: Dabieshan Mountain Area in Hubei Province is an important water supply area of the middle reaches of the Yangtze River, and the middle and lower reaches of the Huai River, as well as an important ecological barrier in the central region. The evaluation of water conservation function provides an important data basis for ecological protection and ecological planning. Take the Dabieshan Mountain Area in Hubei Province as a study object, the paper evaluates the water conservation with the water balance model using high-precision and fine ecosystem types data, and analyzes the impact of spatial distribution characteristics, ecosystem types, altitude, and slope on the water conservation function. The results show that: (1) the mean water conservation depth of the study area in 2020 was 292 mm, and the total water conservation was 43.57×108m3 , which showed it was powerful in the east and weak in the west from the space. (2) the forests and shrubs contributed 70% of the total water conservation; the evergreen broad-leaved forest and evergreen broad-leaved shrub had a better water conservation capacity per unit area, namely 620.63 mm and 539.51 mm respectively. (3) the total water conservation in the middle and lower altitude areas is 100-300 m, accounting for the largest proportion of 42.86%, and the water conservation capacity per unit area in the area of high altitude, namely 1 000-1 700 m was the highest, which was 711.79 mm; the gentle slope area is 5°-15°, making the greatest contribution for the total water conservation, which was 47.80%. (4) the extremely important areas for water conservation took up 6.56% of the total area, and they were mainly in the east, such as Jiuzihe Town, Wenquan Town and Qingshi Town; while the important areas of water conservation accounted for 12.08% of the study area, mainly concentrated in the mountainous areas of Caopandi Town, Shitouzui Town, Yingshan County and Jiuzihe Town, Luotian County in in the south of the study area. The results of this study can provide important data support for ecological environmental protection, ecological restoration planning and ecological space control in the Dabieshan Mountain Area of Hubei Province, and have great significance for promoting the construction of ecological civilization in Dabieshan Mountain Area of Hubei Province.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 孙 晨, 刘 敏. 再分析资料在三峡库区气候效应研究中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1998 -2013 .
[2] 邓鹏鑫, 邴建平, 贾建伟, 王栋. 汉江流域1956~2016年汛期降水时空演变格局[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2132 -2141 .
[3] 吴浪, 周廷刚, 温莉, 刘晓璐, 朱晓波. 基于遥感数据的PM2.5与城市化的时空关系研究——以成渝城市群为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2142 -2152 .
[4] 赵玉岩, 栾维新, 王 辉, 马 瑜.  

城市核心建成区对邻近新增建设用地影响研究——以长江三角洲为例 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2172 -2181 .

[5] 黄杰龙, 陈秋华, 幸绣程, 王立群.  

中国省域森林公园旅游产业竞争力的时空演化特征及影响因素 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2305 -2315 .

[6] 马小亮, 刘桂民, 吴晓东, 徐海燕, 叶琳琳, 张晓兰. 三江源高寒草甸下溪流溶解性有机碳的季节性输移特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2387 -2394 .
[7] 苏 芳, 郑亚萍, 阚立娜, 蔡 莎. 基于CVM调查法评估城市公共绿地服务价值 ——以西部省会城市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2434 -2442 .
[8] 冯 畅, 毛德华, 周 慧, 曹艳敏, 胡光伟. 流域绿水管理博弈建模及应用分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2505 -2517 .
[9] 朱立一, 何伟, 朱璧然, . 纳米二氧化硅和铅复合暴露对 斑马鱼幼鱼甲状腺内分泌系统的毒性影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2588 -2596 .
[10] 周彦锋, 吕大伟, 葛 优, 王晨赫, 刘剑羽, 张 丽, 尤 洋, . 淀山湖河蚬翘嘴红鲌国家级水产种质资源保护区翘嘴鲌产卵场现状[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2733 -2739 .