长江流域资源与环境 >> 2023, Vol. 32 >> Issue (4): 797-808.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202304011

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江上游重点生态功能区生态系统服务福祉效应与层级差异研究

杨雪婷1,邱孝枰2,朱付彪3,徐  云4*,黄天志5   

  1. (1. 绵阳师范学院四川县域经济发展研究中心, 四川 绵阳 621000; 2. 四川师范大学地理与资源科学学院, 四川 成都 610101; 3. 合肥工业大学经济学院,安徽 合肥 230009; 4. 中国科学院、水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所, 四川 成都 610041;5. 绵阳师范学院资源环境工程学院, 四川 绵阳 621000)
  • 出版日期:2023-04-20 发布日期:2023-04-27

Impacts of Ecosystem Services on Human Wellbeing and Hierarchical Differences in Key Ecological Function Areas of Upper Yangtze River

YANG Xue-ting1, QIU Xiao-ping2, ZHU Fu-biao3, XU Yun4, HUANG Tian-zhi5   

  1. (1. Research Center of Sichuan County Economy Development, Mianyang Teachers’ College, Mianyang 621000, China;2. The faculty Geography Resource Sciences, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610101, China; 3.School of economics, Hefei University of technology, Hefei 230009, China;4. Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041,  China; 5. College of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Mianyang Teachers’ College, Mianyang 621000,  China)
  • Online:2023-04-20 Published:2023-04-27

摘要: 长江上游重点生态功能区作为国家“两屏三带”生态安全战略重要空间载体,生态脆弱敏感与经济社会滞后交织,理清生态系统服务与多要素多层级福祉的关系对人地系统协调发展、推进我国生态文明建设具有重要的理论与实践意义。以四川省重点生态功能区为例,基于人类福祉框架识别2000年以来居民福祉水平变化,通过相关分析和面板分位数回归模型探讨不同类型生态系统服务的福祉效应与层级差异。结果表明:(1)重点生态功能区居民福祉显著提升,2000~2018年福祉指数增幅达79.99%,但仍以中低福祉层级为主,东西部差异明显,收入福祉偏低是限制福祉水平整体提升的关键;(2)人均生态系统服务价值(PESV)与居民福祉呈负相关性,其中与教育福祉负向关联最强;(3)生态系统服务福祉效应具有层级异质性,随福祉层级递增PESV负效应趋于弱化,耕地和林地是影响居民福祉的关键生态系统,边际效应方向相反,高福祉层敏感性更强;(4)二三产业比重、城镇化率、人均固定资产投资是重要非生态驱动因子,在不同福祉层级均施加显著正向影响,对低福祉层正向边际贡献更大。

Abstract: As an important spatial carrier of the national ecological security strategy of “two screens and three belts”, the key ecological function area in the upper reaches of Yangtze River is intertwined with ecological sensitivity and socio-economic lagging, clarifying the influence of ecosystem services on multi dimensions and hierarchies of human wellbeing is conducive to the construction of ecological civilization in China and regional sustainable development of human-land system. Taking the key ecological function areas in Sichuan Province as case research object, this study identified changes of human wellbeing since 2000, subsequently, influence of varied ecosystem service types on human wellbeing were observed by utilizing correlation analysis and the panel quantile regression model. Results revealed that: (1) Human wellbeing index increased by 79.99% from 2000 to 2018 and internal structure of the index tended to be more balanced, low income level was an important cause to restrain the overall improvement of human wellbeing, vast majority of counties were still in the middle and poor wellbeing hierarchy, with significant difference between the east and west. (2) Ecosystem service value per capita (PESV) was negatively associated with human wellbeing, especially in the educational dimension. (3) Influence of ecosystem services showed hierarchical heterogeneity, the adverse effect of PESV tended to slow down with the increasing of human wellbeing hierarchy, arable and forestland were found to be the key ecosystems, which imposed larger marginal returns on the high wellbeing hierarchy, arable ecosystem was positive influential factors while forestland was opposite. (4) In terms of control variables, the proportion of secondary and tertiary industries, urbanization rate as well as investment in fixed assets per capita exhibited significant positive influence on each human wellbeing hierarchy, and the marginal contributions to the poor wellbeing hierarchy was greater.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 胡继亮 熊自洁 张悦 高婷. 2019年2期自然灾害水平对农户投保意愿的影响分析——基于湖北微观调查数据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[2] 王凯, 王玉杰, 王彬, 张守红, 王云琦, 王晨沣. 黄壤坡面土壤分离速率研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2114 -2121 .
[3] 潘超, 周驰, 苗滕, 刘林峰, 高健, 焦一滢, 李祝, 张佳敏, 王卉君, 徐德雄. 长江流域鄂西四河流大型底栖动物群落结构特征及水质生物学评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2529 -2539 .
[4] 唐子珺, 陈龙, 覃军, 郑翔. 武汉市一次污染过程的局地流场和边界层结构的数值模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2540 -2547 .
[5] 汪聪聪, 王益澄, 马仁锋, 王静敏. 经济集聚对雾霾污染影响的空间计量研究——以长三角洲地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 1 -11 .
[6] 畅华仪, 张俊飚, 何可, . 技术感知对农户生物农药采用行为的影响研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 202 -211 .
[7] 夏四友 赵媛 文琦 许昕 崔盼盼. 近20年来中国农业碳排放强度区域差异、时空格局及动态演化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[8] 黄烈佳 杨鹏. 2019年7期长江经济带土地生态安全时空演化特征及影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[9] 张陈俊 吴雨思 庞庆华 石常峰. 长江经济带用水量时空差异的驱动效应研究:基于生产和生活视角[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[10] 盖豪, 颜廷武, 何可, 张俊飚, . 社会嵌入视角下农户保护性耕作技术采用行为研究——基于冀、皖、鄂3省668份农户调查数据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(09): 2141 -2153 .