长江流域资源与环境 >> 2023, Vol. 32 >> Issue (10): 2158-2172.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202310014

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

淮河生态经济带水生态文明发展水平的时空格局演变及收敛性研究

张胜武1,黄超群1,李小胜2,刘海猛3*
  

  1. (1.安徽财经大学工商管理学院,安徽 蚌埠 233030;2.安徽财经大学统计与数学学院,安徽 蚌埠 233030;3.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京 100101)

  • 出版日期:2023-10-20 发布日期:2023-10-26

Spatio-Temporal Pattern Evolution and Convergence of Water Ecological Civilization Development Level in Huaihe River Eco-economic Belt

ZHANG Sheng-wu1, HUANG Chao-qun1, LI Xiao-sheng2, LIU Hai-meng3   

  1. (1.College of Business Administration, Anhui University of Finance & Economics, Bengbu 230030, China; 2.College of Statistics and Applied Mathematics, Anhui University of Finance & Economics, Bengbu 230030, China; 3.Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China)
  • Online:2023-10-20 Published:2023-10-26

摘要: 水生态文明是生态文明的基础保障,开展水生态文明发展水平的空间格局及其收敛性研究有助于水生态文明的全面协同建设。以淮河生态经济带为研究对象,考虑其区域发展特色,从水安全、水生态、水环境、水节约、水监管、水文化和水设施等7个维度构建水生态文明综合评价指标体系,采用熵值法综合评价模型测度其2006~2020年间的水生态文明发展水平。运用探索性时空数据分析(ESTDA)模型框架,从时空交互视角分析水生态文明的空间格局及时空依赖动态演化。比选空间面板计量模型,剖析水生态文明发展水平的收敛性及其影响因素。研究发现:(1)研究期内淮河生态经济带水生态文明建设成效显著,尤其2013年之后发展水平成倍提升,但水生态、水文化、水监管仍是水生态文明建设主要短板。空间分布特征从2006年“高—低—中”哑铃式演化为2020年的“高—中—低”阶梯式分布,空间路径锁定与跃迁共存;(2)水生态文明发展水平存在显著的空间自相关特征。LISA时间路径相对长度东部大于西部,84%的城市LISA时间路径弯曲度水平低,在移动方向上缺乏协同整合,存在跃迁惰性,局部空间关联格局稳定性较强;(3)淮河生态经济带水生态文明发展水平不存在σ收敛,均存在显著的绝对β收敛和条件β收敛,且条件β收敛速度更快;(4)本地城市水生态文明发展的收敛性显著受经济发展水平、城镇化等因素影响,也显著受到邻域城市空间溢出效应的负向影响。


Abstract: Water ecological civilization is the basic guarantee of ecological civilization. Understanding of the spatial pattern and convergence of water ecological civilization advancement level is supportive to the comprehensive and coordinated construction of water ecological civilization. Taking the Huaihe River Eco-economic Belt as the research area, a comprehensive evaluation index system consisting of seven dimensions of water security, water ecology, water environment, water conservation, water supervision, water culture and water facilities was constructed. The entropy method comprehensive evaluation model was used to evaluate the water ecological civilization development level from 2006 to 2020. The framework system of exploratory spatio-temporal data analysis (ESTDA) was introduced to analyze the spatial pattern of the development level of water ecological civilization and the dynamic evolution of spatio-temporal dependence from the perspective of spatio-temporal interaction. The spatial panel econometric model was compared and further selected to conduct an empirical analysis on the convergence of the development level of water ecological civilization. This study found that: (1) During the survey period, the construction of water ecological civilization in the study area achieved remarkable results. In particular, the development level was doubled after 2013. However, water ecology, water culture and water supervision were still in the low levels. The characteristics of spatial distribution evolved from "high low medium" dumbbell type distribution in 2006 to "high medium low" ladder type distribution in 2020, and spatial path locking and transition coexisted. (2) The development level of water ecological civilization had significant spatial autocorrelation characteristics. The relative length of the LISA time path was larger in the east than in the west. 84% of the cities had low curvature of the LISA time path, lacked coordination and integration in the moving direction, and had transition inertia. The local spatial correlation pattern was relatively stable. (3) σ Convergence did not exist in the construction of water ecological civilization, but there existed significant absolute value β convergence and conditional β convergence, and moreover, the conditional β convergence was much faster. (4) The convergence of local urban water ecological civilization development was significantly affected by economic development level, urbanization and the negative spatial spillover effect of neighboring cities as well.


No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张梦薇, 吕成文. 丰乐河流域表层土壤有机碳空间变异特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1420 .
[2] 郭莎莎, 胡守庚, 瞿诗进. 长江中游地区多尺度耕地景观格局演变特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1455 .
[3] 韦汝虹, 金 李, 方 达. 基于GIS的中国城市房地产泡沫的空间传染性分析——以2006~2014年35个大中城市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1967 -1977 .
[4] 卢德彬 毛婉柳 杨东阳 赵佳楠. 基于多源遥感数据的中国PM2.5变化趋势与影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[5] 胡继亮 熊自洁 张悦 高婷. 2019年2期自然灾害水平对农户投保意愿的影响分析——基于湖北微观调查数据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[6] 曾源源, 胡守庚, 瞿诗进, . 长江中游经济带交通区位条件变化与建设用地扩张时空耦合规律[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2651 -2662 .
[7] 梁辉 王春凯. 201904产业发展对城市蔓延影响的差异性分析—以长江经济带104个城市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[8] 杨远琴, 任 平, 洪步庭, . 基于生态安全的三峡库区重庆段土地利用冲突识别[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 322 -332 .
[9] 王 倩, 王云琦, 马 超, 王 彬, 李一凡. 缙云山针阔混交林碳通量变化特征及影响因子研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(03): 565 -576 .
[10] 卢德彬, 毛婉柳, 杨东阳, 赵佳楠. 基于多源遥感数据的中国PM2.5变化趋势与影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(03): 651 -660 .