社会减灾能力信任及水灾风险感知的区域对比——基于江西九江和宜春公众的调查

长江流域资源与环境 >> 2009, Vol. 18 >> Issue (1): 92-.

•　自然灾害　• 上一篇

社会减灾能力信任及水灾风险感知的区域对比——基于江西九江和宜春公众的调查

苏筠^1|2| 刘南江³| 林晓梅^1|2

1.北京师范大学地理学与遥感科学学院| 北京100875； 2.北京师范大学区域地理研究实验室| 北京100875； 3.民政部国家减灾中心| 北京100053

收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2009-01-20

REGIONAL COMPARISON OF THE TRUST IN SOCIAL DISASTER REDUCTION ABILITY AND PUBLIC PERCEPTION OF FLOOD RISK——BASED ON THE SURVEY AND ANALYSIS TO THE PUBLIC OF JIUJIANG AND YICHUN, JIANGXI PROVINCE

SU Yun^1|2, LIU Nanjiang^3, LIN Xiaomei^1|2

1.School of Geography, Beijing Normal University|Beijing 100875, China|2.Key Laboratory of Regional Geography, Beijing Normal University|Beijing 100875, China|3.National Disaster Reduction Center of China, Ministry of Civil Affairs, Beijing 100053, China

Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2009-01-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

研究公众对社会减灾能力及灾害风险的认识，有助于从公众视角揭示风险潜在因素，不仅是进行风险沟通的必备环节，还可以为开展有效的减灾宣传教育、提高公众减灾意识提供决策依据。通过社会调查（221份样本）和统计分析方法，比较了江西九江、宜春公众对于社会减灾能力的信任及水灾风险感知。结果表明，公众对于社会减灾能力基本持信任态度，信任度高低排序为：灾害监测预报>政府应急>防灾工程>预警传播，其中宜春公众的信任度较高；公众对于水灾的风险感知较弱，尤其是宜春公众认为水灾发生、受灾的可能性很小；公众的信任与对区域减灾能力的了解无关，主要是受到受灾经历（受灾次数、灾情损失、灾后救援）的影响，即区域本底灾害风险的高低导致公众认知的差异，风险较高区域（九江）的公众具有更为明确的降低风险的行为倾向及意愿。

关键词: 公众信任, 水灾风险感知, 社会减灾能力, 问卷调查, 江西省

Abstract:

In this paper,the research on the perception of public to social disaster reduction ability and disaster risk help was reported to reveal the potential factors of risk from a public visual angle. This research may provide important links to carry out risk communications, and also basis for decisionmaking to conduct effective disaster reduction propaganda and education and to increase the public consciousness on disaster reduction. Through social survey (221 samples) and statistical analysis method,the authors compared the trust in social disaster reduction ability and public perception of flood risk of Jiujiang and Yichun in Jiangxi Province. The results indicate that the public take a trust attitude to social disaster reduction ability, and the degree of trust ranks as the following: disaster monitoring forecast, government ability in dealing with emergencies, disaster prevention engineering, efficiency of warning dissemination. Between the two regions, the degree of trust in Yichun public is higher; while the perception of public to the risk of flood is weaker, as the Yichun public felt that there was little possibility of flood occurrence, nor the disaster suffering. Public are mainly affected by their suffering experiences during disasters (frequency of disaster, loss in disaster,postdisaster rescue work). That is, the degree of risk of local disaster in different regions led to the difference of public perception.In the region with higher risk,such as in Jiujiang,the public hold clearer behavioral tendency and willingness to reduce risk.

Key words: public trust, flood risk perception, social disaster reduction ability, questionnaire survey, Jiangxi Province

苏筠, 刘南江, 林晓梅,. 社会减灾能力信任及水灾风险感知的区域对比——基于江西九江和宜春公众的调查[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(1): 92-.

SU Yun, LIU Nanjiang,LIN Xiaomei,. REGIONAL COMPARISON OF THE TRUST IN SOCIAL DISASTER REDUCTION ABILITY AND PUBLIC PERCEPTION OF FLOOD RISK——BASED ON THE SURVEY AND ANALYSIS TO THE PUBLIC OF JIUJIANG AND YICHUN, JIANGXI PROVINCE[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2009, 18(1): 92-.

参考文献

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	张文婷. 江西省不同地貌单元耕地土壤有机碳空间变异的尺度效应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2619-2628.
[2]	张振东, 张延飞, 唐鑫. 江西省生态文明建设的系统仿真与优化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(09): 1403-1411.
[3]	郑太辉, 陈晓安, 杨洁. 近50 a江西省旱、涝变化趋势及驱动因素研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(04): 664-670.
[4]	花明, 谢青霞. 从“低碳经济”谈江西发展核电的必要性和可行性[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(01): 13-.
[5]	陈静,桂发亮,傅春. 缓解西北地区缺水问题的新途径[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 410-410.
[6]	曾慧卿. 近40年气候变化对江西自然植被净第一性生产力的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 227-227.
[7]	严圣华, 李兆华, 周振兴. 九宫山自然保护区功能模糊综合评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 446-446.
[8]	俞勇军, 陆玉麒. 江西省耕地变化及保护策略[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(3): 234-239.