长江流域资源与环境 >> 2010, Vol. 19 >> Issue (11): 1309-.

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

元谋干热河谷近30年植被变化遥感监测

 周旭, 张斌, 刘刚才   

  1. (1.西华师范大学国土资源学院|四川 南充 637009;2.中国科学院成都山地灾害与环境研究所|四川 成都 610064)
  • 出版日期:2010-11-20

MONITORING OF VEGETATION CHANGE IN YUANMOUDRYHOT VALLEY BASED ON REMOTE SENSING

ZHOU Xu1, ZHANG Bin1, LIU Gangcai2   

  1. (1. School of Land and Resource, China West Normal University, Nanchong 637009, China;
    2. Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610064, China)
  • Online:2010-11-20

摘要:

针对元谋干热河谷植被变化问题,选择多种遥感数据提取NDVI,基于DEM生成地形因子,应用GIS叠加分析其变化特征。结果表明:近30 a来,元谋干热河谷植被变化经历先剧烈退化后缓慢恢复过程;而且恢复期内,中山区、中高山区、平坡和无坡向恢复效果显著且持续稳定,平坝区、缓坡、斜坡、半阴坡和阴坡强烈的恢复过程伴随有强烈的退化过程,低山丘陵区、中低山区、陡坡、险坡、阳坡和半阳坡均又出现退化趋势,中高山区、险坡和阴坡对植被破坏与恢复重建响应最迅速;植被恢复的空间差异和可持续性差异显著。
 

Abstract:

Choosing Yuanmou dryhot valley as a study area,MSS,TM,ETM and CBERS2 CCD images as data source,we extracted apparent reflectance,NDVI,three topographic factors from DEM,and applied GIS overlay method to analyze vegetation change process.Results showed that over the past 30 years,vegetation change of Yuanmou dryhot valley went through a slow recovery after severe degradation.During this period,recovery results of such elevation zones as 1 600~2 000 m,≥2 000 m,slope zone as ≤5°,and aspect zone as -1 were obvious and continuous stability.While in the elevation zone of ≤1 100 m,slope zones of 5~10° and 10~25°,and aspect zones of 2925~3375°,675~1125°,3375~225° and 225~675°,a strong recovery process was accompanied by a strong degradation process.Those elevation zones of 1 100~1 350 m and 1 350~1 600 m,slope zones of 25~35° and ≥35°,and aspect zones of 1575~2025°,2025~2475°,2475~2925°,and 1125~1575° showed degradation trends after 1999.Response rate of vegetation destroy or recovery in the elevation zone of ≥2 000m,slope zone of ≥35°,and aspect zones of 3375~225°and 225~675° were the highest. On the whole,differences of vegetation restoration spatial pattern and sustainability in different topographic conditions are significant,and adjustments and optimizations of restoration countermeasures should be targeted in time

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 娜,许有鹏, 陈 爽. 苏州城市化进程对降雨特征影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 335 -339 .
[2] 孙维侠, 赵永存, 黄 标, 廖菁菁, 王志刚, 王洪杰. 长三角典型地区土壤环境中Se的空间变异特征及其与人类健康的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 113 .
[3] 胡大伟,卞新民,许 泉. 基于ANN的土壤重金属分布和污染评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 475 -479 .
[4] 张洁| 张志斌| 孙欣欣. 云南省矿产资源开发利用中的主要环境问题[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 61 -65 .
[5] 时连强,李九发,应 铭,左书华,徐海根. 长江口没冒沙演变过程及其对水库工程的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 458 -464 .
[6] 邹小兵,曾 婷,TRINA MACKIE,肖尚友,夏之宁. 嘉陵江下游江段春季浮游藻类特征及污染现状[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 612 .
[7] 张代钧,许丹宇,任宏洋,曹海彬,郑 敏,刘惠强. 长江三峡水库水污染控制若干问题[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 605 -610 .
[8] 黄 峰 魏 浪 李 磊 朱 伟. 乌江干流中上游水电梯级开发水温累积效应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(4): 337 .
[9] 胡鸿兴, 张岩岩, 何伟, 田蓉, 钟鑫, 韩世松, 李思思, 王俊杰陈文方, 杨阳, 陈侈, 邓晗, 文英, 崔雅婷, 李茜,  王璇, 彭菁菁, 高鑫, 唐义. 神农架大九湖泥炭藓沼泽湿地对镉(Ⅱ)、铜(Ⅱ)、铅(Ⅱ)、锌(Ⅱ)的净化模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(11): 1050 .
[10] 王肇磊, 贺新枝. 晚清时期湖北自然灾害的治理及其经验教训[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(11): 1080 .