长江流域资源与环境 >> 2014, Vol. 23 >> Issue (07): 954-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201407009

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

马尾松人工林凋落物产量、养分含量及养分归还量特性

葛晓改,周本智,肖文发   

  1. (1.中国林业科学研究院亚热带林业研究所,浙江 富阳 311400;2.中国林业科学研究院森林生态环境与保护研究所,北京 100091
  • 出版日期:2014-07-20

STUDY ON LITTERFALL, NUTRIENT CONTENT AND NUTRIENT RETURN OF PINUS MASSONIANA PLANTATION

GE Xiaogai1,2, ZHOU Benzhi1, XIAO Wenfa2   

  1. (1.Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Fuyang, 311400, China; 2.Research Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China
  • Online:2014-07-20

摘要:

通过文献收集法对亚热带马尾松人工林主要分布区凋落物产量、养分含量和养分归还量进行分析,以研究我国马尾松林主要分布区凋落物养分动态和区域特征,以期在区域尺度上为马尾松林生产经营和生态管理提供更全面和更具普遍性的参考。结果表明:不同地区马尾松人工林凋落物产量差异显著,并随林分龄级而异,10~20、20~30 a龄级马尾松林凋落物产量差异较0~10、30~50 a龄级马尾松林凋落物大,产量最高地区的10~20、20~30龄级林分分别是产量最低地区同一龄级的293、274倍,30~50 a生林分产量最高地区仅是最低地区的137、163倍;凋落物不同养分含量差异显著,三峡库区N元素含量较高,福建三明P、Ca、Mg元素较高,K元素则是贵州龙里较高;广西武宣23 a生林分N归还量是8 a生N归还量的345倍,K归还量则是1013倍。不同凋落物组织器官受环境影响的因素不同,不同林分对环境和立地因子的响应不同,因为气候对凋落物产量的影响具有滞后性,而在局部区域凋落物产量受环境因素影响较大;凋落物养分含量受林分土壤主要养分调节,凋落物养分归还量反映土壤养分的潜力,土壤养分通过马尾松的生长影响凋落物产量,说明马尾松林凋落物养分循环与土壤养分状况有很大关系,二者相辅相成、相互调节

Abstract:

Litterfall, nutrient content and nutrient return in subtropical Pinus massoniana plantations were analyzed based on literature collection to quantify litter nutrient dynamics and regional characteristic of the major conifer species, which would help to provide more comprehensive and universal reference for production practice and ecological management at a regional scale for P.massoniana plantations. The results showed that: the difference of annual litterfall of P.massoniana plantations between different regions was significant and the litterfall was 331-1143 t/hm2〖DK〗·a with an average of 53 t/hm2〖DK〗·a. The litterfall difference was significant by stand age, the difference of litterfall between the class age within 10-20yearold and 20-30yearold was greater than in 0-10yearold and 30-50yearold, and the most litterfall with 10-20 and 20-30 class age were 293 times, 274 times as much as the least, respectively, while the most litterfall in 30-50 class age was only 137 times and 163 times, respectively. Litterfall in Wuxuan, Guangxi Province was increased first and then decreased with stand age, and 7yearold stand was highest in Liuzhou, Guangxi Province and following decreased first and then increased with stand age, while in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area increased with increasing stand age. Litter monthly model was bimodal in Liuzhou, Guangxi province, the deciduous peak was in February and least in March, April, while the model of the total and leaf litterfall was similar and single peak mode in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area with the highest in November and the lowest in February. The litter model in Guanzhou was different per year, the first year peak in August, there was two peak periods in the second year with in July and October, the third year in June. The difference of the same organ with the same element in different regions was lager and the litter nutrient content difference with K, Ca and Mg was higher than the N and P content. Litter nutrient content with nitrogen element was highest in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, while P, Ca, Mg elements were highest in Sanming, Fujian Province, and K element was the highest in Longli, Guizhou Province. Nitrogen return in 23yearold stand was 345 times of that in 8yearold stand, while potassium return in 23yearold stand was 1013 times as much as in 8yearold stand in Wuxuan, Guangxi province. Nitrogen return was 1.36 times more in 7 year old than in 31 year old stand, potassium return in that was 256 times in Liuzhou, Guangxi Province. Litter decomposition rate was not significant in shortterm (one year) decomposition. Litter of different tissues and organs were affected by different environment factors and different stand with various site factors, which can be attributed to the time lagging effect and more responsive to local than to regional environment

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李崇明,黄真理. 三峡水库入库污染负荷研究(Ⅱ)——蓄水后污染负荷预测[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 97 -106 .
[2] 张昌顺,李 昆,马姜明,郑志新. 施肥对印楝人工林生长及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 329 .
[3] 贾泽露,. GIS与SDM集成构建土地定级专家信息系统的研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 323 .
[4] 谢 洪,钟敦伦,李 泳,韦方强. 长江上游泥石流灾害的特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 94 -99 .
[5] 张洁| 张志斌| 孙欣欣. 云南省矿产资源开发利用中的主要环境问题[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 61 -65 .
[6] 刘英华,张世熔, 张素兰, 魏 甦, 肖鹏飞. 成都平原地下水硝酸盐含量空间变异研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(1): 114 -118 .
[7] 况润元 周云轩 李行 田波. 崇明东滩鸟类生境适宜性空间模糊评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(3): 229 -233 .
[8] 邝婵娟. 湘鄂赣农业资源与专业化区域化方向[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 1992, 1(1): 5 .
[9] 段金荣, 张红燕, 刘凯, 徐东坡, 张敏莹, 施炜纲. 湖泊的宜渔性评价研究——以蠡湖为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(06): 666 .
[10] 张利平,秦琳琳,张迪,曾思栋. 南水北调中线水源区与海河受水区旱涝遭遇研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(8): 940 .