长江流域资源与环境 >> 2014, Vol. 23 >> Issue (08): 1166-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201408018

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

汉江上游前坊村黄土剖面化学风化程度及其环境意义

赵艳雷,庞奖励,黄春长,查小春,乔晶   

  1. (陕西师范大学旅游与环境学院,陕西 西安 710062)
  • 出版日期:2014-08-20

CHEMICAL WEATHERING INTENSITY OF THE QFC PROFILE AND ITS ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE IN THE UPPER OF THE HANJIANG RIVER VALLEY,CHINA

ZHAO Yanlei,PANG Jiangli,HUANG Chunchang,ZHA Xiaochun,QIAO Jing   

  1. (College of Tourism and Environment,Shaanxi Normal University,Xi’an 710062,China)
  • Online:2014-08-20

摘要:

通过对郧县前坊村黄土剖面常量元素及相关参数分析,采用Al为标准的变化率参数计算。结果表明:(1)古土壤S0形成时期,土壤磁化率、粘粒成分、CIA值较典型黄土L1高,Na/K值低于典型黄土L1。这表明古土壤形成时期,气候温暖湿润,土壤风化淋溶较强,反映了较强的成壤过程,在黄土堆积时期气候相对干冷,沙尘暴频繁出现,土壤的成壤作用较弱;(2)碳酸盐含量的剧烈变化是影响黄土元素分布特征很重要的因素,其中,一些元素如Mn和Fe在剖面中的含量较高,主要是碳酸盐被强烈淋溶造成的相对富集;(3)前坊村剖面中,常量元素风化成土过程中,Na、Ca、Mg、K、Si和Ti在古土壤S0为主要迁移元素,其迁移顺序为:Na>Ca>Mg>K>Si>Ti;Mn和Fe表现的轻微富集;常量元素的迁移特征指示了汉江上游谷地黄土已经完成初级的脱Ca、Na阶段,应进入了早期去K的中等风化阶段

Abstract:

This paper presents data from QFC loesspalaeosol profile in the Hanjiang River Valleytry to illustrate weathering intensity and its environmental significance. To evaluate the degree of weathering using major elements content and related parameters, using Al as the standard rate of change of parameter calculation. Experimental results showed that: (1) magnetic susceptibility, clay composition, and CIA value of the paleo sol S0 is higher than those of typical loess L1, while Na/K value is lower than that of the typical loess L1. It indicates that it was warm and humid climate, with stronger weathering and leaching during the palaeosol S0 formation period, reflecting the strong pedogenesis; while it was  relatively dry and cold, and dust storms occur frequently during loess accumulation period, reflecting weak pedogenes.(2)The dramatic changes of carbonate content is an very important factor influencing the element distribution of loess.Elements content such as Mn and Fe increased in palaesol is mainly caused by the leaching of the carbonate.(3) In the QFC profile the major elements such as Na, Ca, Mg, K, Si and Ti in paleosol S0 are the main migration elements whose migration order is  Na>Ca>Mg>K>Si>Ti;  Mn and Fe expressed relative slightly enriched, other major elements in the profile are expressed as relative migration. This indicates loess in upper reaches of Hanjiang valley has completed primary off the Ca and Na phase, and should go into the early off K, with moderate weathering stages.(4) Difference is clear in the value of climatic proxies in paleosol and loess. Susceptibility, clay content, clay/coarse silt ratio and the CIA are higher values in paleosol S0 while they are relatively low in loess. It indicates that the water and heat conditions was the most appropriate during paleosol S0 formation period, with strong pedogenesis; while the climate was cold and dry during the loess accumulation period, with weak pedogenesis.Weathering intensity order is paleosol S0> Holocene loess L0>transition Lt> Malan loess L1.(5) It was cold and dry, and dust storms occur frequently, forming Malan loess L1 in the late Pleistocene (11 500 aBP). Climate shift from coldwet to warmhumid during the early Holocene (between 11 500-8 500 aBP) and dust storm activity gradually decreased to form a transitional loess layer Lt.It was warm and humid, and dust storm sediments were strongly modified to form paleosol S0 during the midHolocene (between 8 500-3 000 aBP).It tended to be cooler and drier during the late Holocene (since 3 000 aBP), and dust storms were obviously intensified to form loess L0.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李崇明,黄真理. 三峡水库入库污染负荷研究(Ⅱ)——蓄水后污染负荷预测[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 97 -106 .
[2] 曾 辉,,宋立荣,于志刚,陈洪涛. 三峡水库“水华”成因初探[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 336 .
[3] 叶延琼,陈国阶. GIS支持下的岷江上游流域景观格局分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 112 -115 .
[4] 郑海霞, 童菊儿, 郑朝洪, 徐 扬. 东南沿海经济发达地区耕地数量的动态变化及其驱动力研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 435 .
[5] 况润元 周云轩 李行 田波. 崇明东滩鸟类生境适宜性空间模糊评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(3): 229 -233 .
[6] 施建刚, 裘丽岚. 成都平原城市群的城市流分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(9): 796 .
[7] 夏智宏, 周月华, 许红梅. 基于SWAT模型的汉江流域水资源对气候变化的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(2): 158 .
[8] 王顺久. 岷江径流变化特征及其对青藏高原气候变化的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(8): 933 .
[9] 邓祥征, 吴红, 吴锋, 林英志. 基于社会经济核算矩阵的江西省氮磷减排调控方案研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(2): 217 .
[10] 徐德兰 |韩宝平 |高明侠 |宋新桓 |董 萧 |闫 姗. 大型水生植物对骆马湖氮磷元素及磷酸酶活性的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(11): 1368 .