长江流域资源与环境 >> 2015, Vol. 24 >> Issue (01): 97-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201501013

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

城市地表形态对热环境的影响——以上海市为例

尹昌应, 石忆邵, 王贺封, 吴婕   

  1. (同济大学测绘与地理信息学院,上海 200092)
  • 出版日期:2015-01-20

IMPACTS OF URBAN LANDSCAPE FORM ON THERMAL ENVIRONMENT AT MULTISPATIAL LEVELS

YIN Changying, SHI Yishao, WANG Hefeng, WU Jie   

  1. (College of Surveying and Geoinformatics, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)
  • Online:2015-01-20

摘要:

基于遥感与GIS技术,利用Landsat7ETM+影像反演地表温度,用社会经济统计数据、土地利用现状数据和道路交通网络数据计算城市景观形态参数以表征地表特征,从行政区(县)、5 km间距同心环带和局部区块3个水平上划分空间单元建立数据样本,分析城市地表形态对热环境空间分布格局的影响。结果表明:(1)景观混合度和景观分裂度对地表温度有恒定的负向影响,区块连通性与地表温度负相关;(2)景观分裂度对热环境的影响取决于地类属性:分裂度大的增温地类,地表增温效应弱;分裂度大的降温地类,地表降温效应强;(3)人口密度和经济密度可对地表温度产生恒定正向影响;(4)人口密度、建设用地比例和房屋建筑比例是分布在区(县)尺度、同心圆环尺度和典型区块尺度上影响地表热环境最显著的地表形态要素

Abstract:

During rapid urbanization, urban thermal environment as an important aspect of humans living environment has attracted wide attentions in the fields of sustainable urban planning and landscape designing, climate change, geography, etc. Over the past few decades, research methods of urban thermal environment have transitioned from the statistics of the meteorological observation data, regional climate mode,  to analysis based on remote sensing technology; the spatial level also gradually changed from the large scope from urban-rural area to urban internal space, analysis topic has turned from urban thermal environment pattern to the driving factors of urban internal thermal environment. However, urban thermal environment fields are still subject to spatial resolution of remote sensing images and limited by the shortage of surface parameters.Most previous researches on this field analyzed the problem only on one spatial scale, and the multiscale features of the correlation are scientific issues with insufficient discussion and confidential conclusion. We selected Shanghai as an case study to analyze the correlation between land surface thermal environment (STE) and urban landscape form (ULF). We used Landsat7 ETM+ images to retrieve urban land surface temperature; socioeconomic statistics data, land use maps and urban traffic network maps were used for characterizing urban landscape features; and there are three spatial statistic levels in this study,such as administrative district (county) level, 5 km concentric rings level and street blocks level. We employed ERDAS Imagine software to process remote sensing images, used ArcGIS software for spatial data management, and used Fragstats software to calculate urban landscape parameters. The results showed that: (1) the impact of ULF on STE had a certain scalerelative dependence, the correlation between ULF and STE at different level presented the same direction but different numeric degree; (2) population density and economic density had a positive and constant effect on land surface temperature (LST); (3) both landscape mixture and landscape division had constant negative effects on LST, the correlation between block connectivity and LST was negative; (4) the impact strength of landscape division on thermal environment was dependent on landscape attribute: the higher division that warming class had, the lower strength land surface warming effect was; the higher division that cooling class had, the more strength land surface cooling effect was; (5) urban population density, the developed land proportion and housing land proportion were produced the most significant effect on urban thermal environment scale at district/county level, concentric ring level and typical blocks level, respectively. It can be concluded that: urban population density mainly determines the macro distribution pattern of urban thermal environment; in the belt of population density, the distribution pattern of urban thermal environment is mainly affected by the proportion of developed land; and housing land proportion is the landscape factor that effects local land surface thermal environment pattern when the proportion of developed land are comparative

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 聂钠, 于坤香. 我国世界自然遗产地旅游业环境经济核算思路[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(2): 121 .
[2] 曹银贵,王 静,程 烨,刘爱霞,许 宁,郝 银,饶彩霞. 三峡库区土地利用变化与影响因子分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 748 .
[3] 徐俊杰, 何 青, 刘 红, 陈吉余. 2006年长江特枯径流特征及其原因初探[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(5): 716 .
[4] 游庆龙. 三江源地区1961~2005年气温极端事件变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 232 .
[5] 吴炳方,罗治敏. 基于遥感信息的流域生态系统健康评价——以大宁河流域为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(1): 102 -106 .
[6] 郝红升,李克锋,李然,赵再兴. 取水口高程对过渡型水库水温分布结构的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(1): 21 -25 .
[7] 刘承良, 田 颖, 梁 滨,5. 武汉城市圈产业经济的系统性分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(1): 1 .
[8] 伍新木,廖 丹,严 瑾. 制度创新:依托武汉建设长江中游城市群[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 1 -6 .
[9] 李翀,廖文根,彭静,叶柏生. 宜昌站1900~2004年生态水文特征变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(1): 76 -80 .
[10] 张心怡,刘 敏,孟 飞. 基于RS和GIS的上海城建用地扩展研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 29 -33 .