大坝截流前后金沙江观音岩水电站鱼类群落功能多样性的变化

doi:10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201506010

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 人类活动通过对非生物因素和生物多样性的作用从而对生态系统功能产生了巨大的影响。大量的理论和实验研究表明,物种功能性状在连接群落组成改变和生态系统进程转变中起着重要作用。由于物种功能性状的差异,栖息环境改变后,群落中容易适应新环境的物种占据优势,难以适应的物种数量减少甚至消失,从而导致整个群落结构发生改变,进而使整个生态系统进程发生转变。通过评价金沙江观音岩水电站大坝截流前后鱼类群落组成情况,结合不同种类功能性状的差异,采用生物多样性评估方法和功能多样性指数分析方法两种不同手段,对比分析截流前后大坝下游鱼类群落结构和功能多样性的变化,从而分析大坝建设的生态效应。结果表明:Bray-Curtis相异指数前后差异较大,辛普森指数无明显变化;功能多样性指数的变化表明大坝截流对水体中体型较大,口下位,食谱宽度较窄的鱼类生存和活动造成了一定的破坏,导致拥有这些特征的鱼类数量减少甚至消失,降低了下游鱼类群落的功能多样性,进而对该区域整个生态系统功能产生影响。

关键词: 功能多样性, 性状, 功能丰富度, 功能均匀度, 功能离散度, 生态系统

Abstract: Human activities have strong impacts on ecosystem functioning through their effect on abiotic factors and on biodiversity. Classically, biodiversity changes have been assessed using diversity indices that take into account the number of species present (species richness) and the evenness of abundance distribution among species. However, such indices based only on taxonomic identity provide an incomplete view of biodiversity. Indeed, they do not take into account the biological identity and differences among species. While a lot of theoretical and experimental studies have shown that species functional traits play an important role in connecting changes in community composition and shifts in ecosystem processes. Based on this, we used two different methods, the traditional biodiversity assessment and functional diversity index, to analyze the change of ecosystem function before and after the dam closure of the Guanyinyan Hydropower Station. The purpose of this study is twofold: one is evaluation of the effects of the Ganyinyan Hydropower Station construction in the Jinsha River on the ecological system function, providing certain reference basis for the construction of water conservancy projects in the future, also laying a certain foundation for the author's next phase study. The second is through comparison and analysis to find a more effective and reliable method of assessing ecosystem function. Due to differences in functional traits of species, after habitat change, species that can adapt to new the environments will dominate in community, while species that can't adapt to the new environment will reduce the number or even disappear, leading to the community structure change, and thus make the entire ecosystem process shift. In this paper, by monitoring the fish community composition before and after the Guanyinyan dam construction, combined with the difference of fish functional traits, analyzed the changes of fish community structure and functional diversity before and after the closure of the dam, then make an evaluation of the impact caused by dam construction. Our results show that dam closure has caused some damages on the existence and behavior of the species with larger size, hypostomatous and narrow recipes width; resulted in a decrease in the number of or even disappear of the fish and reduced the functional diversity of fish communities downstream, and then a certain effect on the entire ecosystem function of this area.

Key words: functional diversity, traits, richness, evenness, divergence, ecosystem

中图分类号:

X826

苏国欢, 沙永翠, 熊鹰, 张培育, 徐军. 大坝截流前后金沙江观音岩水电站鱼类群落功能多样性的变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(06): 965-970.

SU Guo-huan, SHA Yong-cui, XIONG Ying, ZHANG Pei-yu, XU Jun. CHANGES OF FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY IN FISH COMMUNITY BEFORE AND AFTER A DAM CLOSURE IN THE GUANYINYAN HYDROPOWER STATION[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2015, 24(06): 965-970.

参考文献

[1] 曹文宣.有关长江流域鱼类资源保护的几个问题[J].长江流域资源与环境,2008,17(2):163-164.
[2] 徐薇,乔晔,龚昱田.长江上游鱼类资源变迁及其保护评析[J].人民长江,2012,43(1):67-71.
[3] 杨志,郑海涛,熊美华,等.彭水电站蓄水前后鱼类群落多样性特征[J].环境科学与技术,2011,34(8):22-29.
[4] PIELOU E C.An introduction to mathematical ecology[M].Wiley-Interscience,1969.
[5] LEPS J,BROWN V K,LEN D,et al.Separating the chance effect from other diversity effects in the functioning of plant communities[J].Oikos,2001,92(1):123-134.
[6] 江小雷,张卫国.功能多样性及其研究方法[J].生态学报,2010,30(10):2766-2773.
[7] VILLEGER S,MIRANDA J R,HERNANDEZ D F,et al.Contrasting changes in taxonomic vs.functional diversity of tropical fish communities after habitat degradation[J].Ecological Applications,2010,20(6):1512-1522.
[8] DíAZ S,CABIDO M.Vive la difference:Plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes[J].Trends in Ecology & Evolution,2001,16(11):646-655.
[9] 张金屯,范丽宏.物种功能多样性及其研究方法[J].山地学报,2012,29(5):513-519.
[10] 唐会元,杨志,高少波,等.金沙江中游圆口铜鱼早期资源现状[J].四川动物,2012,31(3):416-421.
[11] 高少波,唐会元,乔晔,等.金沙江下游干流鱼类资源现状研究[J].水生态学杂志,2013,34(1):43-49.
[12] 吴江,吴明森.金沙江的鱼类区系[J].四川动物志,1990,9(3):23-26.
[13] 张觉民,何志辉.内陆水域渔业自然资源调查手册[M].北京:农业出版社,1991.
[14] BLOOM S A.Similarity indices in community studies:Potential pitfalls[J].Mar Ecol Prog Ser,1981,5(2):125-128.
[15] HURLBERT H S.The nonconcept of species diversity:A critique and alternative parameters[J].Ecology,1971,52(4):577-586.
[16] 吴坤君,龚佩瑜,盛承发.昆虫多样性参数的测定和表达[J].昆虫知识,2005,42(3):338-340.
[17] MASON N W H,MOUILLOT D,LEE W G,et al.Functional richness,functional evenness and functional divergence:The primary components of functional diversity[J].Oikos,2005,111(1):112-118.
[18] PETCHEY O L.Integrating methods that investigate how complementarity influences ecosystem functioning[J].Oikos,2003,101(2):323-330.
[19] SCHLEUTER D,DAUFRESNE M,MASSOL F,et al.A user's guide to functional diversity indices[J].Ecological Monographs,2010,80(3):469-484.
[20] VILLEGER S,MASON N W,MOUILLOT D.New multidimensional functional diversity indices for a multifaceted framework in functional ecology[J].Ecology,2008,89(8):2290-2301.
[21] IHAKA R,GENTLEMAN R.R:a language for data analysis and graphics[J].Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics,1996,5(3):299-314.
[22] 中国科学院生物多样性委员会.生物多样性研究的原理方法[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1994.
[23] VILLEGER S,RAMOS MIRANDA J,FLORES HERNANDEZ D,et al.Low functional beta-diversity despite high taxonomic beta-diversity among tropical estuarine fish communities[J].PLoS One,2012,7(7):e40679.
[24] 刘建康,康曹文.长江流域的鱼类资源及其保护对策[J].长江流域资源与环境,1992,1(1):17-23.
[25] 危起伟.长江上游珍稀特有鱼类国家级自然保护区考察报告[M].北京:科学出版社,2012.
[26] 段辛斌.长江上游鱼类资源现状及早期资源调查研究[D];武汉:华中农业大学硕士学位论文,2008.
[27] 刘瑞秋.三峡大坝截流前后长江中上游江段水化学特性的初步调查[J].水生生物学报,2000,24(5):446-450.

相关文章 15

[1]	程建, 程久苗, 吴九兴, 徐玉婷. 2000~2010年长江流域土地利用变化与生态系统服务功能变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(06): 894-901.
[2]	罗海平, 宋焱, 彭津琳. 基于Costanza模型的我国粮食主产区生态服务价值评估研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(04): 585-590.
[3]	虎陈霞, 郭旭东, 连纲, 张忠明. 长三角快速城市化地区土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响——以嘉兴市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(03): 333-340.
[4]	赵志刚, 余德, 韩成云, 王凯荣. 2008~2016年鄱阳湖生态经济区生态系统服务价值的时空变化研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(02): 198-208.
[5]	周天舒, 张亚, 唐文乔, 王丽卿. 基于鱼类完整性指数的黄浦江水生态系统评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(06): 895-903.
[6]	李卫明, 艾志强, 刘德富, 周晓明. 基于水电梯级开发的河流生态健康研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(06): 957-964.
[7]	李敏, 张灿明, 李姣, 邓学建. 基于淹水特征的分时段湿地生态系统管理——以南洞庭湖万子湖为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(05): 769-776.
[8]	赵筱青, 顾泽贤, 高翔宇. 人工园林大面积种植区土地利用/覆被变化对生态系统服务价值影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(01): 88-97.
[9]	焦雯珺, 闵庆文, 李文华, Anthony M. Fuller. 基于ESEF的水生态承载力评估——以太湖流域湖州市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(01): 147-155.
[10]	王军, 顿耀龙. 土地利用变化对生态系统服务的影响研究综述[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(05): 798-808.
[11]	胡振鹏. 应用生态系统方法研究鄱阳湖枯水调节[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(2): 133-.
[12]	刘丽丽, 刘金萍, 李建国, 关冰, 郭晴晴, 郭跃, 杨爽. 基于属性层次-识别模型的重庆市南岸区生态系统健康评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(2): 214-.
[13]	朱佩娟, 马林志. 基于复合生态系统理论的长沙湘江滨水区景观资源评价与优化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(01): 86-.
[14]	程飞, 吴清江, 谢松光. 水文生态学研究进展及应用前景[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(01): 98-.
[15]	孙洪波, 杨桂山, 万容容, 吴业. 昆山生态系统服务价值变化及其驱动力差异性分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(8): 759-.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed