长江流域资源与环境 >> 2015, Vol. 24 >> Issue (06): 956-964.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201506009

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

西南地区近14 a植被覆盖变化及其与气候因子的关系

张勃1, 王东1, 王桂钢2, 马琼1, 张国斌1, 季定民1   

  1. 1. 西北师范大学地理与环境科学学院, 甘肃 兰州 730000;
    2. 甘肃省地图院, 甘肃 兰州 730000
  • 收稿日期:2014-05-05 修回日期:2014-07-17 出版日期:2015-06-20
  • 作者简介:张 勃(1963~ ),男,教授,主要从事区域环境与资源开发研究.E-mail:zhangbo@nwnu.edu
  • 基金资助:
    高校博士学科点专项科研基金(20136203110002);国家自然科学基金资助项目(40961038);生态经济学省级重点学科(5002-021)

VEGETATION COVER CHANGE OVER THE SOUTHWEST CHINA AND ITS RELATION TO CLIMATIC FACTORS

ZHANG Bo1, WANG Dong1, WANG Gui-gang2, MA Qiong1, ZHANG Guo-bing1, JI Ding-min1   

  1. 1. College of Geography and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730000, China;
    2. Institution of Gansu survey and mapping, Lanzhou 730000, China
  • Received:2014-05-05 Revised:2014-07-17 Online:2015-06-20

摘要: 基于1999~2012年NDVI数据,结合气温和降水资料,运用GIS和RS技术,分析了西南地区近14 a植被覆盖的时空变化特征及与气温、降水的关系。结果表明:(1)该区植被生长良好,各植被类型NDVI均呈显著增加趋势。空间整体表现为改善状态,改善面积远大于退化面积,严重退化区仅占1.18%。退化区分布于横断山地北部、四川盆地东部以及云贵高原中部。(2)植被覆盖变化将以良性发展为主,但强持续性的退化区和弱持续性的改善区应值得关注;强持续性的退化区主要分布在横断山地中北部、云贵高原中西部、若尔盖高原中部、四川盆地与若尔盖高原相交区域;草原强持续性的退化面积最大,针阔混交林强持续性的改善面积最大。(3)NDVI与温度存在明显的正相关关系,而与降水及干旱指数变化的关系不太明显,温度是影响该区植被变化的主要自然因素。

关键词: 植被覆盖, 时空变化, 相关性, 西南地区

Abstract: The vegetation is important to maintain the ecological environment in the earth, and it is affected by climate factors significantly. Dynamic monitoring of the vegetation variation could reflect the trend of climate change to some extent. Vegetation cover change is one of the cores of global environmental change research, but also the front and hot field of modern physical geography. SPOT AVHRR NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) in the Southwest during the period from 1999 to 2012 was selected to get the vegetation cover change information based on GIS and RS technology. The temporal and spatial vegetation cover change were analyzed by using spatial data covering the Southwest in the past 14 years, and discussed the relationship between major climatic factors (temperature, precipitation and SPEI) and the vegetation. The results are shown as follows. (1) From 1999 to 2012, NDVI vegetation of the Southwest had an entirely rising trend, with the growth of 6.9%/10 a, and this was faster than average of China. There were some significant spatial differences of the vegetation cover change, and the NDVI of the seven vegetation types increased significantly. Meanwhile the vegetation coverage appeared improvement as a whole area. The NDVI decreased area covered only about 1.18% of the whole study area. The decreased area was mainly distributed on the north of Hengduan Mountains, the east of Sichuan Basin and the central part of Yungui Plateau. (2) The Hurst index of NDVI time series shows that the vegetation restoration was sustainable, and it is expected that the area of vegetation cover change to healthy development, but the NDVI decreased areas with strong persistence and the NDVI increased areas with weak persistence might be indicative. Grassland degradation & strong sustainability area is the largest, as well as the improvement of the mixed needle & strong sustainability area. The decreased areas with strong persistence was mainly distributed on the north-central of Hengduan Mountains, the Midwest of Yungui Plateau, zoige plateau central, and northern Sichuan basin intersect with the Zoige plateau area. (3) In the past 14 years, the climate of the Southwest presented a process of distinct warming and drying. Analyzing the space distribution principle of temperature, the annual average temperature raised overall in the Southwest, meanwhile west of the Southwest has an entirely rising trend and East was opposite. Precipitation and drought trend was decreased in South and the North of the area is increased. There was significant positive correlation between NDVI and temperature, and precipitation was not strong correlated relatively with NDVI in the Southwest, and precipitation was the key to affect vegetation growth on the study area. In addition, no significant correlation between SPEI and NDVI could be found in the Southwest.

Key words: vegetation coverage, temporal and spatial change, correlation, the Southwest

中图分类号: 

  • TP79
[1] 孙红雨,王常耀,牛 铮,等.中国植被覆盖变化及其与气候因子关系——基于NOAA时间序列数据[J].遥感学报,1998,2(3):204-210.
[2] 周广胜,王玉辉,蒋延玲.全球变化与中国东北样带(NECT)[J].地学前沿,2002,9(1):198-216.
[3] 赵 济.中国自然地理[M].第4版.北京:高等教育出版社,1997.
[4] 马建华.西南地区近年特大干旱灾害的启示与对策[J].人民长江,2010,41(24):7-12.
[5] BACHELET D,NEILSON R P,LENIHAN J M,et al.Climate change effects on vegetation distribution and carbon budget in the United States[J].Ecosystems,2001,4:164-185.
[6] 张远东,张笑鹤,刘世荣.西南地区不同植被类型归一化植被指数与气候因子的相关分析[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(2):323-330.
[7] 华 维,范广洲,李洪权,等.西南地区近21年来NDVI变化特征分析[J].成都信息工程学院学报,2008,23(1):91-97.
[8] 蒙吉军,王 钧.20世纪80年代以来西南喀斯特地区植被变化对气候变化的响应[J].地理研究,2007,26(5):857-865.
[9] 张笑鹤,张远东,顾峰雪,等.西南地区灌丛归一化植被指数动态及其与气候因子的相关性[J].生态学杂志,2011,30(11):2577-2583.
[10] 董谢晾,段 旭.西南地区降水量的气候特征及变化趋势[J].气象科学,1998,18(3):239-247.
[11] 庞 瑞,顾峰雪,张远东,等.西南高山地区净生态系统生产力时空动态[J].生态学报,2012,32(24):7844-7856.
[12] 方精云,朴世龙,贺金生,等.近20年来中国植被活动在增强[J].中国科学(C辑),2003,33(6):554-565.
[13] 张 丽,何晓旭,魏 鸣.基于NDVI的淮河流域植被覆盖度动态变化[J].长江流域资源与环境,2012,21(Z1):51-56.
[14] STOW D,PETERSEN A,HOPE A,et al.Greenness trends of Arctic tundra vegetation in the 1990s:Comparison of two NDVI datasets from NOAA AVHRR systems[J].International Journal of Remote Sensing,2007,28(21):4807-4822.
[15] 李学梅,任志远.近十年重庆市NDVI变化及对气温降水的旬响应特征分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2014,23(1):101-108.
[16] 马明国,王 建,王雪梅.基于遥感的植被年际变化及其与气候关系研究进展[J].遥感学报,2006,10(3):421-431.
[17] 徐建华.现代地理学中的数学方法[M].第2版.北京:高等教育出版社,2001.
[18] VICENTE SERRANO S M,BEGUERIA S,LOPEZ-MORENO J I.A multiscalar drought index sensitive to global warming:the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index[J].Journal of Climate,2010,23(7):1696-1718.
[19] 熊光洁,张博凯,李崇银,等.基于SPEI的中国西南地区1961-2012年干旱变化特征分析[J].气候变化研究进展,2013,9(3):192-198.
[20] 许玲燕,王慧敏,段琪彩,等.基于SPEI的云南省夏玉米生长季干旱时空特征分析[J].资源科学,2013,35(5):1024-1034.
[21] 邱海军,曹明明.基于SPOT VEGETATION数据的中国植被覆盖时空变化分析[J].资源科学,2011,33(2):335-340.
[22] 朴世龙,方静云.1982-1999我国陆地植被活动对气候变化的季节差异[J].地理学报,2003,58(1):119-125.
[1] 顾铮鸣, 金晓斌, 沈春竹, 金志丰, 周寅康. 近15a江苏省水源涵养功能时空变化与影响因素探析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2453-2462.
[2] 刘金科, 韩贵琳, 阳昆桦, 柳满. 九龙江流域河水溶解态碳的时空变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2578-2587.
[3] 王水霞, 殷淑燕, 赵芮芮, 周亚利. 秦岭南部地区农业气候资源的变化及其对油菜的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(06): 882-893.
[4] 郎登潇, 师嘉褀, 郑江坤, 廖峰, 马星, 王文武, 陈怡帆. 近52a西南地区潜在蒸散发时空变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(06): 945-954.
[5] 陈优良, 陶天慧, 丁鹏. 长江三角洲城市群空气质量时空分布特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(05): 687-697.
[6] 刘俸霞, 王艳君, 赵晶, 陈雪, 姜彤. 全球升温1.5℃与2.0℃情景下长江中下游地区极端降水的变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(05): 778-788.
[7] 杨雪婷, 方一平, 邱孝枰, 朱付彪. 川西山区交通与GDP的海拔梯度性及其相关关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(04): 530-539.
[8] 周志高, 林爱文, 王伦澈. 长江中游城市群太阳辐射长期变化特征及其与气象要素的关系研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(04): 563-571.
[9] 刘静, 殷淑燕. 1960~2014年秦岭南北无霜期时空变化特征及对比分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(04): 615-623.
[10] 卢燕宇, 王胜, 田红, 邓汗青, 何冬燕. 近50年安徽省气候生产潜力演变及粮食安全气候承载力评估[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(03): 428-435.
[11] 杨超杰, 贺斌, 段伟利, 李冰, 陈雯, 杨桂山. 太湖典型丘陵水源地水质时空变化及影响因素分析——以平桥河流域为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(02): 273-281.
[12] 赵登忠, 肖潇, 汪朝辉, 谭德宝, 陈永柏. 水布垭水库水体碳时空变化特征及其影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(02): 304-313.
[13] 赵平伟, 郭萍, 李立印, 舒珺. SPEI及SPI指数在滇西南地区干旱演变中的对比分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(01): 142-149.
[14] 郭弘艺, 张旭光, 唐文乔, 李辉华, 沈林宏, 周天舒, 刘东. 长江靖江段刀鲚捕捞量的时间变化及相关环境因子分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(12): 1850-1859.
[15] 刘世杰, 苏舒, 梁亮, 童小华. 基于植被状态指数的干旱化特征及气候驱动因素分析——以江苏省为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(12): 1927-1933.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李长杰,王先甲,范文涛,郑旭荣. 水市场双边叫价贝叶斯博弈模型及机制设计研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 465 -469 .
[2] 胡建民, 石忆邵. 略论耕地库兹涅茨曲线在我国的适用性[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 588 .
[3] 段学军, 陈 雯. 省域空间开发功能区划方法探讨[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 540 -545 .
[4] 唐 涛,渠晓东,蔡庆华,刘建康. 河流生态系统管理研究——以香溪河为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(6): 594 -598 .
[5] 杨载田, 刘沛林. 南岭山区传统聚落景观资源及其旅游开发研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 35 -39 .
[6] 陈 路,倪学明. 低湖田生态系统特点及开发利用研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(6): 579 -583 .
[7] 孙会首, 黄贤金, 钟太洋, 杨旭红,于术桐, 马宗伟. 区域农业市场化发展对水土流失的影响——以江西省为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(6): 573 -578 .
[8] 冯文兰,周万村,李爱农,张宝雷,. 基于GIS的岷江上游乡村聚落空间聚集特征分析——以茂县为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 57 .
[9] 李贵祥,孟广涛,方向京,郭立群,柴 勇,和丽萍,张正海. 云南金沙江流域主要森林植被类型分布格局[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 51 .
[10] 袁 俊, 吴殿廷, 常 旭. 关于我国首都迁址的再探讨[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 540 .