长江流域资源与环境 >> 2017, Vol. 26 >> Issue (01): 7-14.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201701002

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于三阶段DEA与Malmquist指数分解的长江经济带水资源利用效率研究

卢曦1,2, 许长新1   

  1. 1. 河海大学商学院, 江苏 南京 210098;
    2. 江苏理工学院商学院, 江苏 常州 213001
  • 收稿日期:2016-05-18 修回日期:2016-07-21 出版日期:2017-01-20
  • 作者简介:卢曦(1982~),女,博士研究生,讲师,主要研究方向为水资源效率和水资源环境.E-mail:sjhbaby1104@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(51279058)

STUDY THE UTILIZATION EFFICIENCY OF WATER RESOUCES IN YANGTZE RIVER ECONOMIC BELT BASED ON THREE-STAGE DEA AND MALMQUIST INDEX DECOMPOSITION

LU Xi1,2, XU Chang-xin1   

  1. 1. Business School of HoHai University, Nanjing 210098, China;
    2. Business School of Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou 213001, China
  • Received:2016-05-18 Revised:2016-07-21 Online:2017-01-20
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China (51279058)

摘要: 长江经济带水资源的合理有效使用为经济的可持续发展提供了重要保障。以长江经济带11省市为研究对象,运用三阶段DEA模型和Malmquist对2010~2014年11省市水资源的利用效率进行了静态和动态分析。研究结果表明:在剔除了外部环境因素和随机误差因素以后,纯技术效率均值和综合技术效率均值被低估,规模效率均值被高估,投入规模不足是扼制我国水资源利用效率提升的瓶颈。同时,东中西部省份的水资源利用效率差异显著,呈现“东部 > 中部 > 西部”的格局。通过对Malmquist指数分解可知,全要素生产率指数与技术变化值的演变趋势基本一致,反映了全要素生产率指数对技术变化的严重依赖。因此,扩大生产规模,加大科技投入和知识创新,优化和升级产业结构是提高水资源利用效率的重要途径。

关键词: 三阶段DEA模型, Malmquist指数, 综合技术效率, 纯技术效率, 规模效率, 全要素生产率(TFP)

Abstract: Rational and effective use of water resources in the Yangtze River economic belt provides an important guarantee for the sustainable development of the economy. In this paper, taking 11 provinces and cities of the Yangtze River economic belt as the research objects, we used a three-stage DEA model and the Malmquist index method to conduct static and dynamic analyses of the water resources utilization efficiency of 11 provinces in 2010-2014. The results showed that after removing the external environmental factors and random error factors, the mean pure technical efficiency and mean comprehensive technical efficiency were underestimated, the scale efficiency was overestimated, insufficient investment scale was bottleneck of our country's water resource utilization efficiency. At the same time, the differences of water resources utilization efficiency in the eastern and western provinces were significant, showing a pattern of "Eastern > middle > West". Using the Malmquist index decomposition we found that the evolution trends of total factor productivity index and technological change were basically the same, which reflected the serious dependence of the total factor productivity index on technological change. Therefore, to expand the scale of production, increasing investment in science and technology and knowledge innovation, optimizing and upgrading the industrial structure are important ways to improve water resources utilization efficiency.

Key words: three-stage DEA model, Malmquist index, comprehensive technical efficiency, pure technical efficiency, scale efficiency, total factor productivity

中图分类号: 

  • TV211
[1] 马建华. 建设长江经济带的水利支撑与保障[J]. 人民长江, 2014, 45(5):1-6. [MA J H. Establishment of water resources support and guarantee for Yangtze River economic zone[J]. Yangtze River, 2014, 45(5):1-6.]
[2] 桑连海, 陈进. 长江流域的节水形势及发展方向[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1):10-13. [SANG L H, CHEN J. Current position and emerging trends of water-saving in the Yangtze Basin[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2006, 15(1):10-13.]
[3] 董战峰, 喻恩源, 裘浪, 等. 基于DEA模型的中国省级地区水资源效率评价[J]. 生态经济, 2012(10):43-47. [DONG Z F, YU E Y, QIU L, et al. Water efficiency evaluation of the provincial regions in China based on DEA model[J]. Ecological Economy, 2012(10):43-47.]
[4] 钱文婧, 贺灿飞. 中国水资源利用效率区域差异及影响因素研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2011, 21(2):54-60. [QlAN W J, HE C F. China's regional difference of water resource use efficiency and influencing factors[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2011, 21(2):54-60.]
[5] 廖虎昌, 董毅明. 基于DEA和Malmquist指数的西部12省水资源利用效率研究[J]. 资源科学, 2011, 33(2):273-279. [LIAO H C, DONG Y M. Utilization efficiency of water resources in 12 western provinces of China based on the DEA and Malmquist TFP index[J]. Resources Science, 2011, 33(2):273-279.]
[6] 孙爱军, 董增川, 王德智. 基于时序的工业用水效率测算与耗水量预测[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2007, 36(4):547-553. [SUN A J, DONG Z C, WANG D Z. Prediction of technical efficiency and water consumption of industrial water in China based on time series[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2007, 36(4):547-553.]
[7] 王学渊, 赵连阁. 中国农业用水效率及影响因素——基于1997-2006年省区面板数据的SFA分析[J]. 农业经济问题, 2008, 29(3):10-18. [WANG X Y, ZHAO L G. Agricultural water efficiency and the causal factors-a stochastic frontier analysis based on Chinese provincial panel data1997-2006[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2008, 29(3):10-18.]
[8] CHARNES A, COOPER W W, RHODES E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2(6):429-444.
[9] AIGNER D, LOVELL C A K, SCHMIDT P. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1977, 6(1):21-37.
[10] 郭亚军. 基于三阶段DEA模型的工业生产效率研究[J]. 科研管理, 2012, 33(11):16-23. [GUO Y J. Industrial production efficiency based on a three-stage DEA model[J]. Science Research Management, 2012, 33(11):16-23.]
[11] FRIED H O, LOVELL C A K, Schmidt S, et al. Accounting for environmental effects and statistical noise in data envelopment analysis[J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2002, 17(1/2):157-174.
[12] JONDROW J, LOVELL C A K, MATEROV I S, et al. On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1982, 19(2/3):233-238.
[13] 罗登跃. 三阶段DEA模型管理无效率估计注记[J]. 统计研究, 2012, 29(4):104-107. [LUO D Y. A note on estimating managerial inefficiency of three-stage DEA model[J]. Statistical Research, 2012, 29(4):104-107.]
[14] 陈巍巍, 张雷, 马铁虎, 等. 关于三阶段DEA模型的几点研究[J]. 系统工程, 2014, 32(9):144-149. [CHEN W W, ZHANG L, MA T H, et al. Research on three-stage DEA model[J]. Systems Engineering, 2014, 32(9):144-149.]
[15] 马海良, 黄德春, 张继国. 考虑非合意产出的水资源利用效率及影响因素研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2012, 22(10):35-42. [MA H L, HUANG D C, ZHANG J G. Water resource utility efficiency and its influencing factors considering undesirable goods[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2012, 22(10):35-42.]
[16] 张力小, 梁竞. 区域资源禀赋对资源利用效率影响研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(8):1237-1247. [ZHANG L X, LIANG J. Effect of the regional resource endowment on resource utilization efficiency[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2010, 25(8):1237-1247.]
[17] 孙孝文. 长江流域产业结构分析与思考[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2009, 9(4):41-45. [SUN X W. Analysis and thinking on industrial structure of Yangtze Basin[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Social Science Edition), 2009, 9(4):41-45.]
[18] 马勇, 黄猛. 长江经济带开发对中部崛起的影响与对策[J]. 经济地理, 2005, 25(3):298-301. [MA Y, HUANG M. The impact and counter measure of the development of the Yangtze River economic zone to the growing up of central area of China[J]. Economic Geography, 2005, 25(3):298-301.]
[19] 曹飞. 基于三阶段DEA-Malmquist模型的中国省域城镇化效率测度及其收敛分析[J]. 青岛科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 31(4):18-22. [CAO F. The efficiency test based on the three stages of DEA-Malmquist model of Chinese provincial urbanization and its convergent analysis[J]. Journal of Qingdao University of Science and Technology (Social Sciences), 2015, 31(4):18-22.]
[20] 华坚, 李政霖, 吴祠金. 基于三阶段DEA-Malmquist模型的我国农业全要素生产率增长研究[J]. 江西农业学报, 2015, 27(10):134-141. [HUA J, LI Z L, WU C J. Research on increase in agricultural total-factor productivity in China based on three-stage DEA-Malmquist model[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2015, 27(10):134-141.]
[1] 崔玮, 苗建军, 邹伟. 武汉城市圈土地利用空间关联的碳排放效率及其收敛性分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(12): 1824-1831.
[2] 刘传江, 赵晓梦. 长江经济带全要素碳生产率的时空演化及提升潜力[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(11): 1635-1644.
[3] 庞 英,孙 巍. 基于非参数方法的中国棉花产出规模效率时空特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 88-88.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 沈 军,刘尚灵,陈振楼,毕春娟. 横沙岛潮滩沉积物中重金属的空间分布与累积[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 485 -489 .
[2] 徐长义,钟登华,曹广晶. 我国水电可持续发展的理性思考[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 535 .
[3] 罗红霞, 龚健雅, 蹇代君. 亚热带低山丘陵区土壤遥感监测图像处理[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 41 -47 .
[4] 李崇明,黄真理. 三峡水库入库污染负荷研究(Ⅰ)——蓄水前污染负荷现状[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 611 -622 .
[5] 郭 华,,殷国强5|姜 彤. 未来50年鄱阳湖流域气候变化预估[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 73 .
[6] 郑海霞, 童菊儿, 郑朝洪, 徐 扬. 东南沿海经济发达地区耕地数量的动态变化及其驱动力研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 435 .
[7] 黄尤优, 刘守江, 胡进耀, 刘晓琴, 胥晓. 唐家河保护区主要植被类型景观格局的梯度分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(2): 197 .
[8] 吴绍华, 李植斌, 周生路, 陈东湘. 区域经济空间过程阻力面模型的初步研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 535 -539 .
[9] 姚 珩 冯新斌 郭艳娜 孟 博. 乌江中上游新建水库水体甲基汞的时空分布[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(4): 343 .
[10] 王怀清, 赵冠男, 彭静, 胡菊芳. 近50年鄱阳湖五大流域降水变化特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(7): 615 .