长江经济带全要素碳生产率的时空演化及提升潜力

doi:10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201611001

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 将碳排放引入全要素生产率分析框架之中，利用Malmquist指数对长江经济带2000~2013年的全要素碳生产率进行测算。实证研究结果显示：（1）从时间维度来看，在此期间长江经济带碳生产率一直处于震荡上升的趋势，而全要素碳生产率处于较平稳的状态，年均增长率为2%；（2）从空间差异来看，长江经济带上中下游碳生产率区域差异明显，下游 > 中游 > 上游，全要素碳生产率下游区域高于中上游区域，而中游区域和上游区域则处于“追赶-超越-被反超”的状态；（3）上游区域全要素碳生产率增长的动力为技术效率的提高，中游区域全要素碳生产率平均下降了0.1%的原因为技术进步恶化的幅度已经完全抵消了技术效率提升带来的变化，下游区域主要是通过技术创新推动最优生产前沿向外移动使得全要素碳生产率平均增长了4.4个百分点；（4）安徽和贵州两地碳生产率提高的空间最大，而云南、四川和重庆地区也可通过技术进步、技术创新促进碳生产率的提高，上海、浙江、江苏和江西的碳生产率提升空间最小。

关键词: 长江经济带, 碳生产率, 全要素碳生产率, Malmquist指数

Abstract: This article introduces the carbon into the framework of TFP analysis and uses Malmquist Index to measure and calculate the Total Factor Productivity Carbon (TFPC) in the Yangtze River economic belt from 2000 to 2013. The empirical results show:1.From the time dimension of view, during this period the carbon productivity of the Yangtze River economic belt has an upward trend in shock while the TFPC is relatively stable with the average annual growth rate of 2%; 2.From the perspective of spatial difference analysis, the carbon productivity is obvious different in the different regional of Yangtze River economic belt:downstream > midstream > upstream. Total factor productivity in the downstream is higher than that in the upstream region, while the midstream and upstream is in the condition that "catch-beyond-unsurpassed"; 3.In the upstream region, the power to improve the TFPC is the improvement of technical efficiency. In the midstream region, TFPC decreased by 0.1%, that is because changes brought about technical efficiency has been completely offset by the magnitude of the deterioration of technical progress. Through technological innovation the downstream region promoted the optimal production frontier moved outward, so that TFPC increasd 4.4 percentage points4.In Anhui and Guizhou, the carbon productivity have the room for improvement meanwhile, Yunnan, Sichuan and Chongqing can also promote the improvement of carbon productivity through technology progress and technology innovation. However, the room for improvement carbon productivity of Shanghai, Zhejiang, Jiangsu and Jiangxi is minimum.

Key words: the Yangtze River economic belt, carbon productivity, total factor productivity carbon, Malmquist Index

中图分类号:

F205

刘传江, 赵晓梦. 长江经济带全要素碳生产率的时空演化及提升潜力[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(11): 1635-1644.

LIU Chuan-jiang, ZHAO Xiao-meng. RESEARCH ON SPATIAL-TEMPORAL EVOLUTION OF TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY CARBON AND POTENTIAL TO INCREASE CARBON PRODUCTIVITY IN THE YANGTZE RIVER ECONOMIC BELT[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2016, 25(11): 1635-1644.

参考文献

[1] 刘传江. 生态经济学视野下的中国生态文明发展道路[J]. 绿叶, 2015(3):47-57.[LIU C J. The development path of ecological civilization in china under the perspective of ecological economics[J]. Green Leaf, 2015(3):47-57.]
[2] KAYA Y, YOKOBOR K. Environment, energy and economy:strategies for sustainability[M]. Strategies for Sustainability:United Nations University Press, 1997.
[3] 张成, 蔡万焕, 于同申. 区域经济增长与碳生产率——基于收敛及脱钩指数的分析[J]. 中国工业经济, 2013(5):18-30.[ZHANG C, CAI W H, YU T S. Regional economic development and carbon productivity-a convergent and decoupling index analysis[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2013(5):18-30.]
[4] 潘家华, 张丽峰. 我国碳生产率区域差异性研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2011(5):47-57.[PAN J H, ZHANG L F. Research on the regional variation of carbon productivity in China[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2011(5):47-57.]
[5] 徐大丰. 碳生产率的差异与低碳经济结构调整——基于沪陕投入产出表的比较研究[J]. 上海经济研究, 2012(11):55-64.[XU D F. The carbon productivity difference and low-carbon industrial structure adjustment-comparative analysis based on Shanghai and Shanxi input-output data[J]. Shanghai Journal of Economics, 2012(11):55-64.]
[6] 张永军. 技术进步, 结构变动与碳生产率增长[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2011(5):114-120.[ZHANG Y J. Technical progress, industrial structure and carbon productivity growth[J]. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2011(5):114-120.]
[7] 张丽峰. 基于LMDI分解法的我国碳生产率影响因素研究[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2013, 29(7):742-745.[ZHANG L F. Research on carbon productivity influence factors in China based on LMDI decomposition method[J]. Resource Development & Market, 2013, 29(7):742-745.]
[8] MENG M, NIU D X. Three-dimensional decomposition models for carbon productivity[J]. Energy, 2012, 46(1):179-187.
[9] 张成, 王建科, 史文悦, 等. 中国区域碳生产率波动的因素分解[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2014, 24(10):41-47.[ZHANG C, WANG J K, SHI W Y, et al. Decomposition on the fluctuation of China's regional carbon productivity growth[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2014, 24(10):41-47.]
[10] FÄRE R, GROSSKOPF S, NORRIS M, et al. Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries[J]. The American Economic Review, 1994, 84(1):66-83.
[11] RAMANATHAN R. An analysis of energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions in countries of the middle east and North Africa[J]. Energy, 2005, 30(15):2831-2842.
[12] 匡远凤, 彭代彦. 中国环境生产效率与环境全要素生产率分析[J]. 经济研究, 2012(7):62-74.[KUANG Y F, PENG D Y. Analysis of environmental production efficiency and environmental total factor productivity in China[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2012(7):62-74.]
[13] 张丽峰. 基于DEA模型的全要素碳生产率与影响因素研究[J]. 工业技术经济, 2013(3):142-149.[ZHANG L F. Research of total factor carbon productivity and influence factors based on the DEA model[J]. Journal of Industrial Technological Economics, 2013(3):142-149.]
[14] NAKANO M, MANAGI S. Productivity analysis with CO₂ emissions in Japan[J]. Pacific Economic Review, 2010, 15(5):708-718.
[15] 王兵, 吴延瑞, 颜鹏飞. 环境管制与全要素生产率增长:APEC的实证研究[J]. 经济研究, 2008(5):19-32.[WANG B, WU Y R, YAN P F. Environmental regulation and total factor productivity growth:an empirical study of the APEC economies[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2008(5):19-32.]
[16] 刘瑞翔, 安同良. 资源环境约束下中国经济增长绩效变化趋势与因素分析——基于一种新型生产率指数构建与分解方法的研究[J]. 经济研究, 2012(11):34-47.[LIU R X, AN T L. Trend and factor analysis of Chinese economic growth performance under restrictions of resource and environment——a research based on a new method of productivity index's construction and decomposition[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2012(11):34-47.]
[17] 张丽峰. 碳排放约束下中国全要素生产率测算与分解研究——基于随机前沿分析(SFA)方法[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2013, 27(12):20-24.[ZHAN L F. Research of total factor productivity calculation and decomposition under the restraint of carbon emissions in China[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2013, 27(12):20-24.]
[18] BEINHOCKER E, OPPENHEIM J, IRONS B, et al. The carbon productivity challenge:Curbing climate change and sustaining economic growth[J]. McKinsey Global Institute, 2008(6):1-48.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed