长江流域资源与环境 >> 2020, Vol. 29 >> Issue (7): 1653-1662.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202007018

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

劳动成本上升背景下农户农药施用行为差异研究 ——基于精细管理技术的中介效应

袁斌1,陈超2   

  1. (1.中国海洋大学管理学院,山东 青岛 266100;2.南京农业大学经济管理学院,江苏 南京 210095)
  • 出版日期:2020-07-20 发布日期:2020-08-28

Study on the Difference of Pesticide Application Behavior Farmers Under the Background of Rising Labor Cost: Based on the Mediating of Fine Management Technology

YUAN Bin 1,CHEN Chao 2   

  1. (1.College of Management, Ocean University of China,Qingdao 266100, China; 2. College of Economics & Management, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China)
  • Online:2020-07-20 Published:2020-08-28

摘要: 作为实现乡村振兴战略的重要抓手,如何实现农药零增长一直是现代农业政策关注的重点。基于上述问题,通过全国18个省份农户的微观调查数据,尝试从精细管理技术投入的视角,分析劳动成本变化对农户农药使用行为的影响。研究发现:对于从事园艺等劳动密集型作物种植的农户而言,劳动成本上升将促使农药施用量的增加,而精细管理技术投入则在两者间起到部分中介作用。精细管理技术投入的增加能够有效提高农户的施药效率并降低其单次的农药用量。而与此同时,由于精细管理农户所面临的经营风险相对较大,因而农药施用次数相对较高,故不同精细管理技术投入的农户在农药施用总量方面并未呈现明显差异。因此,政府可尝试通过扶持农产品品牌建设、发展农业生产服务组织等方式,在引导农户生产方式精细化的同时,实现农药的减量投入。

Abstract: As an important starting point for realizing the strategy of rural rejuvenation, how to achieve zero growth in pesticides is central to the agricultural policy. From the perspective of investment of fine management technology, the paper attempted to analyze the impact of labor cost on behavior of farmers pesticide usage based on micro-survey data of farmers in 18 provinces. The results showed as follows: The rising labor cost has led to an increase in the amount of pesticide application for farmers who engaged in the cultivation of labor-intensive crops such as horticulture. What’s more, the investment in fine management technology will play a part of the mediating role between labor cost and pesticide application. The efficiency of pesticide application had been improved and the amount of pesticide application every time had been reduced by adding more fine management technology. At the same time, there was no significant difference among farmers with different fine-management technology inputs in the total pesticide usage, duo to relatively high number of pesticide applications for farmers facing more risk of production. Therefore, tit is necessary to support the agricultural product brand construction, develop agricultural production service organization which guides the farmers to refine the production method in order to reducing amount of pesticide usage.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 解晓南,许朋柱,秦伯强. 太湖流域苏锡常地区地面沉降若干问题探析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(1): 125 -131 .
[2] 刘丙军,邵东国,阳书敏,曹卫锋. 基于灰关联熵的汉江中下游地区水资源分配模型和方法研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 699 -703 .
[3] 杨志荣,吴次芳, 靳相木, 姚秋萍. 基于DEA模型的城市用地经济效益比较研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(1): 14 .
[4] 刘耀彬, 李仁东. 现阶段湖北省经济发展的地域差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 12 -17 .
[5] 张心怡,刘 敏,孟 飞. 基于RS和GIS的上海城建用地扩展研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 29 -33 .
[6] 贾 丽, 沈玉芳. 我国生态工业园发展的SWOT分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 711 .
[7] 李友辉,董增川,孔琼菊. 廖坊水利工程对抚河流域生态承载力的影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 148 .
[8] 夏 敏,赵小敏,张佳宝,刘友兆,曾志强. 基于GIS的土地适宜性评价决策支持系统——以南京市江宁区淳化镇为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 325 -329 .
[9] 金相灿,孟凡德,姜 霞,王晓燕,庞 燕. 太湖东北部沉积物理化特征及磷赋存形态研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 388 -393 .
[10] 陈怡男 李学林. 资源所在地的利益补偿机制初探——以油气田资源开发为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(3): 254 -258 .