长江流域资源与环境 >> 2020, Vol. 29 >> Issue (11): 2384-2395.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202011006

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

武汉市城郊乡村旅游地的类型划分及时空分布特征研究

冯  娟1,2,谭辉丽1,2* ,吕绛荣1,2,程绍文1,2   

  1. (1.华中师范大学城市与环境科学学院,湖北 武汉 430079;2.中国旅游研究院武汉分院,湖北 武汉 430079)
  • 出版日期:2020-11-20 发布日期:2020-12-17

Classification and Temporal-Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Rural Tourism Destinations in Suburb of Wuhan City

FENG Juan 1,2,TAN Hui-li 1,2,LV Jiang-rong 1,2  ,CHENG Shao-wen 1,2   

  1. (1.  College of Urban and Environmental Science,Central China Normal University,Wuhan 430079, China;2. Wuhan Branch of China Tourism Academy,Wuhan 430079,China)
  • Online:2020-11-20 Published:2020-12-17

摘要: 在对武汉市城郊534个乡村旅游地进行类型划分的基础上,运用数理统计和空间分析法,对其时空分布特征和影响因素进行研究,得出以下结论:(1)武汉市城郊乡村旅游地在发展过程中,呈现出四个明显的发展时段,旅游极化发展形成的空间冷热点区随时间而发生变化,现已在武汉市西北、西部和南部形成三大旅游集聚区。(2)武汉市城郊乡村旅游地类型日益多元化,从发展初期的休闲观光和乡村文化两种类型逐步增加至休闲观光、乡村文化、农事体验、农业科技、特色村镇等五种类型;不同类型的乡村旅游地发展速度、规模、极化趋势各异。(3)与中心城区距离、相关政策、道路交通条件、水文因素、旅游资源禀赋等均对乡村旅游地的时空分布特征产生影响,各个因素对不同类型旅游地时空分布的影响存在一定差别。

Abstract: Exploring the temporal-spatial evolution of suburban rural tourism destinations and its determinants of spatial distribution is conducive to guiding orderly rural tourism development in suburban area,the hot area of rural tourism development; and it is helpful for guiding suburban rural tourism development practice and rural-revitalization-strategy policy making. 534 rural tourism destinations within Wuhan City’s rural urban fringe were analyzed and classified, and the mathematical statistics and spatial analysis methods including the nearest neighbor index, kernel density estimation and Hotspot analysis were fully applied to study the temporal-spatial distribution features and its influencing factors. The conclusions are as follows: (1) Rural tourism development in suburban Wuhan has experienced four distinct development periods; and the distribution of rural destination hot spots and cold spots in Wuhan has been changing dynamically; now, three tourism agglomeration areas have been formed in the northwest, west and south of Wuhan. (2) The types of rural tourism destinations in Wuhan are increasingly diversified, from the original two types (sightseeing tourism destinations and cultural tourism destinations) to current five types (sightseeing tourism destinations, farming tourism destinations, agricultural technology tourism destinations, cultural tourism destinations, and special village and town), and there are differences in the development speed, scale and agglomeration of different types of rural tourist destinations. Thereinto, sightseeing tourism destinations have the largest development scale, with a significant trend of concentrated development, forming a multi-core development distribution pattern; and farming tourism destinations started later, but with the fastest development speed and the highest degree of concentration;meanwhile, special villages and towns also experience some agglomeration distribution with indistinct agglomeration evolution trend, and the radiation range of the polar core are always small;cultural tourism destinations gradually evolved from scattered distribution to a spatial pattern combining "great dispersion" and "small agglomeration";agricultural technology tourism destinations have been in the state of dispersion rather than agglomeration.(3) Distance from the central urban area, policies factor, traffic conditions, the hydrological factors and quality of rural tourism attractions, all are determinants of the spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of rural tourist destinations with different impacts on the spatial and temporal distribution of different types of tourist destinations. This research ended with some suburban rural tourism development references and suggestions.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李建豹, 黄贤金, 孟 浩, 周 艳, 徐国良, 吴常艳. “十二五”时期中国碳排放强度累积目标完成率分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1655 .
[2] 熊鸿斌, 周凌燕. 基于PSR-灰靶模型的巢湖环湖防洪治理工程生态环境影响评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1977 -1987 .
[3] 李嘉译, 匡鸿海, 谭 超, 王佩佩. 长江经济带城市扩张的时空特征与生态响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2153 -2161 .
[4] 唐子珺, 陈龙, 覃军, 郑翔. 武汉市一次污染过程的局地流场和边界层结构的数值模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2540 -2547 .
[5] 王东香, 张一鸣, 王锐诚, 赵炳炎, 张志麒, 黄咸雨, . 神农架大九湖泥炭地孔隙水溶解有机碳特征及其影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2568 -2577 .
[6] 王海力, 韩光中, 谢贤健. 基于DEA模型的西南地区耕地利用效率时空格局演变及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2784 -2795 .
[7] 汪聪聪, 王益澄, 马仁锋, 王静敏. 经济集聚对雾霾污染影响的空间计量研究——以长三角洲地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 1 -11 .
[8] 赵树成, 张展羽, 夏继红, 杨洁, 盛丽婷, 唐丹, 陈晓安, . 鄱阳湖滨岸土壤磷素吸附特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 166 -174 .
[9] 阮甜, 查芊郁, 杨茹, 高超. 全球升温1.5℃和2.0℃对长江寸滩站以上流域径流的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 407 -415 .
[10] 邵祎婷, 何毅, 穆兴民, 高鹏, 赵广举, 孙文义, . 秦巴山区降雨侵蚀力时空变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 416 -425 .