长江流域资源与环境 >> 2023, Vol. 32 >> Issue (2): 403-414.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202302016

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

三峡水库消落带土壤养分含量及生态化学计量特征

孙阔1,2,袁兴中1,2*,王晓锋3,袁嘉1,2,候春丽1,2,魏丽景4   

  1. (1.重庆大学建筑城规学院,重庆 400044;2.重庆大学三峡库区消落区生态修复与治理研究中心,重庆 400044;3.长江上游湿地科学研究重庆市重点实验室,重庆 401331;4.重庆市开州区自然保护地管理中心,重庆 405400)
  • 出版日期:2023-02-20 发布日期:2023-03-09

Characteristics Soil Nutrient Content and Ecological Stoichiometry in the Littoral Zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area

SUN Kuo1,2, YUAN Xing-zhong1,2, WANG Xiao-feng3,  HOU Chun-li1,2, YUAN Jia1,2, WEI Li-jing4   

  1. (1. Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China;2. Ecological Restoration and 
    Control of Water Level Fluctuating Zone in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China;
    3. Chongqing Key Laboratory of Wetland Science Research Center of the Upper Reaches of the Yangtze River, Chongqing 401331, China;4. Kaizhou District Nature Reserve Management Center, Kaizhou 405400, Chongqing, China)
  • Online:2023-02-20 Published:2023-03-09

摘要: 作为世界上最大的水利工程,三峡水库的建设和运行对三峡水库消落带土壤环境产生了重大影响。已有研究多关注于三峡库区中某一段消落带或某一支流消落带的土壤环境变化,而缺乏对全库区消落带进行研究。以全库区尺度(8个断面)的不同海拔消落带土壤(155~165 和165~175 m)为研究对象,以断面未淹没区(175~185 m)土壤为对比,对土壤养分(土壤有机质-SOM、总氮-TN、总磷-TP、总钾-TK)及生态化学计量(C/N、C/P和N/P)分布特征进行研究。结果表明:(1)消落带SOM、TN、TP和TK的含量均低于未淹没区,而C/N、C/P和P/K的值均高于未淹没区;(2)消落带165~175 m的SOM和TN分别为21.27和1.14 g·kg-1,均显著低于155~165 m海拔和对照组相对应的土壤养分含量,而T/N和N/P分别为11.07和2.68,与对照组的土壤化学计量比有显著的差异性,且SOM变异性最小为6%、TP变异性最高为24%;(3)三峡库区全域内,上游(涪陵区)和中游(忠县、万州区、云阳县、奉节县)的土壤养分含量显著高于下游(巫山县和秭归县)地区,且SOM、TN、TP和TK的最高值为忠县和万州区消落带土壤,而库区中上游的土壤养分生态化学计量比显著低于下游,且C/N、C/、PN/P的最低值均为涪陵区消落带土壤;(4)消落带土壤养分及化学计量比的分布特征受到消落带的海拔及采样点环境特征的显著影响,且采样点环境特征的影响程度更大。研究表明,自2010年175 m蓄水后,经历了8年季节性淹没-出露的影响,消落带的养分流失状况依旧存在,其中库区下游及165~175 m的消落带土壤养分保持能力较差,应重点加强该区域和消落带中部高程区土壤保持,以维持三峡水库消落带及水生生态系统健康。

Abstract: As the largest hydroelectric power project in the world, the construction and operation of the Three Gorges reservoir have a significant impact on the soil environment in the littoral zone of the Three Gorges reservoir. Previous studies focused more on the changes of soil environment in the littoral zone of a river section or a tributary of the Three Gorges reservoir, and lacked the understanding of the changes of soil environment in the littoral zone of the whole reservoir area. This study investigated and analyzed the distribution characteristics of soil nutrients and ecological stoichiometry in the littoral zone at the scale of the whole reservoir and at different altitudes (155-165 m and 165-175 m), including soil organic matter (SOM), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP) and total potassium (TK) content and stoichiometric ratios (C/N, C/P and N/P) a in the whole reservoir (eight sample sections). The results showed that, 1) compared with the unsubmerged area, the contents of SOM, TN, TP and TK in the submerged area of the littoral zone were lower, and the values of C/N, C/P and P/K were higher. 2) The contents of SOM and TN in 165-175 m horizontal fluctuation zone were 21.27 g·kg-1 and 1.14 g·kg-1, which were significantly lower than those of the altitude of 155-165 m and 175-178 m. And the T/N and N/P value in 165-175 m were 11.07 and 2.68, which were significantly different with the unsubmerged area. Besides, the content of SOM and TP were 6% and 24%, which were the lowest and highest variability during all soil nutrients. 3) For the whole reservoir area, the soil nutrient content in the upper reaches(Fuling)and middle reaches (Zhongxian, Wanzhou, Yunyang and Fengjie) of the reservoir area is significantly higher than that in the lower reaches (Wushan and Zigui), while the nutrient metering ratio of the upper reaches and middle reaches is significantly lower than that in the lower reaches. The highest value of SOM, TN, TP and TK were found in Zhongxian and Wanzhou district, and the lowest value of C/N, C/P and N/P were found in Fuling district. 4) The distribution characteristics of soil nutrients and stoichiometric ratio in the water-level fluctuation zone were significantly affected by the altitude of the water-level fluctuation zone and the environmental characteristics of the sampling site, and the environmental characteristics of the sampling site had a greater impact. The research shows that the nutrient loss in the littoral zone still existed after the flooding of 175 m after 2010, and the soil nutrient retention ability of the littoral zone of the downstream and 165-175 m littoral zone in the reservoir area is poor. Therefore, soil conservation in this area and the elevation area in the middle of the littoral zone should be strengthened to maintain the health of the littoral zone and aquatic ecosystem of the Three Gorges reservoir.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 吴浪, 周廷刚, 温莉, 刘晓璐, 朱晓波. 基于遥感数据的PM2.5与城市化的时空关系研究——以成渝城市群为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2142 -2152 .
[2] 文高辉 杨钢桥. 耕地细碎化对农地整治农户土地权属调整意愿的影响研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[3] 马小亮, 刘桂民, 吴晓东, 徐海燕, 叶琳琳, 张晓兰. 三江源高寒草甸下溪流溶解性有机碳的季节性输移特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2387 -2394 .
[4] 苏 芳, 郑亚萍, 阚立娜, 蔡 莎. 基于CVM调查法评估城市公共绿地服务价值 ——以西部省会城市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2434 -2442 .
[5] 刘冀, 孙周亮, 张特, 程雄, 董晓华, 谈新. 基于不同卫星降雨产品的澴水花园流域径流模拟比较研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2558 -2567 .
[6] 朱立一, 何伟, 朱璧然, . 纳米二氧化硅和铅复合暴露对 斑马鱼幼鱼甲状腺内分泌系统的毒性影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2588 -2596 .
[7] 马剑锋, 佟金萍, 王慧敏, 王 圣. 长江经济带农业用水全局技术效率的空间效应研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2757 -2765 .
[8] 谢五三, 吴 蓉, 丁小俊. 基于FloodArea模型的城市内涝灾害风险评估与预警[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2848 -2855 .
[9] 谢贤鑫 陈美球 . 农户生态耕种采纳意愿及其异质性分析—基于TPB框架的实证研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[10] 胡兴坤, 高 雷, 杨 浩, 刘绍平, 陈大庆, 段辛斌 . 长江中游黄石江段鱼类早期资源现状[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 60 -67 .