长江流域资源与环境 >> 2023, Vol. 32 >> Issue (4): 842-854.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202304015

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

农村生活污水处理支付意愿及影响因素研究——以云南省拉市海流域为例#

吴健,许亿欣,徐上,张红亮*   

  1. (中国人民大学环境学院,北京 100872)
  • 出版日期:2023-04-20 发布日期:2023-04-27

Research on Willingness to Pay for Rural Domestic Sewage Treatment and Its Influencing Factors: Evidence from Lashihai Watershed in Yunnan Province

WU Jian, XU Yi-xin, XU Shang, ZHANG Hong-liang   

  1. (School of Environment & Natural Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China)
  • Online:2023-04-20 Published:2023-04-27

摘要: 农村生活污水处理是农村公共物品供给的重难点之一。近年来,农村生活污水处理在运行阶段普遍面临巨大的资金缺口,农户能否以付费形式参与农村生活污水处理的供给,对于建设美丽宜居乡村、推动乡村振兴具有重要意义。选取云南省拉市海流域作为案例地点,采用条件价值评估法,测度农户对农村生活污水处理服务的支付意愿,并用多元有序Logistic模型分析其影响因素,在此基础上结合运行成本讨论农户意愿支付水平的成本有效性。结果表明:大多数农户有意愿且有能力为农村生活污水处理付费,低、中、高三种处理效果下,农户的实际意愿支付水平可以覆盖适宜工艺的运行成本;各处理效果下,农户的主体意识、与环境改善相关的收入对其意愿支付水平存在显著正向影响。因此,对农村生活污水处理收费具有一定的社会基础和经济基础,应加快建立起农户付费制度,拓宽农村生活污水处理的资金渠道。

Abstract: Providing effective treatment for rural domestic sewage is a significant challenge in supplying public goods to rural areas. In recent years, funding shortages have made it difficult to sustain operations for rural domestic sewage treatment facilities. To promote the development of a beautiful and livable countryside and support rural revitalization, it is essential to determine whether farmers are willing to pay for these services. This study focuses on the Lashihai watershed in Yunnan Province as a case study and uses the contingent valuation method to estimate farmers’ willingness to pay for rural domestic wastewater treatment. The study also identifies the factors that influence farmers’ willingness to pay by employing a multivariate ordered logistic model. Finally, the study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of farmers’ willingness to pay based on operating costs. The findings reveal that most farmers have the willingness and ability to pay for rural domestic wastewater treatment, and their willingness to pay can cover the operating costs of appropriate treatment processes with low, medium, and high treatment effects. Additionally, the study shows the significant positive effects of farmer’s subject consciousness and income related to environmental improvement on their willingness to pay. Therefore, charging for rural domestic sewage treatment is justifiable both socially and economically, and the government should establish a farmer payment system to increase the funding source.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 孙 晨, 刘 敏. 再分析资料在三峡库区气候效应研究中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1998 -2013 .
[2] 邓鹏鑫, 邴建平, 贾建伟, 王栋. 汉江流域1956~2016年汛期降水时空演变格局[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2132 -2141 .
[3] 赵玉岩, 栾维新, 王 辉, 马 瑜.  

城市核心建成区对邻近新增建设用地影响研究——以长江三角洲为例 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2172 -2181 .

[4] 高洁芝, 郑华伟, 刘友兆. 基于熵权TOPSIS模型的土地利用多功能性诊断[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2496 -2504 .
[5] 冯 畅, 毛德华, 周 慧, 曹艳敏, 胡光伟. 流域绿水管理博弈建模及应用分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2505 -2517 .
[6] 周彦锋, 吕大伟, 葛 优, 王晨赫, 刘剑羽, 张 丽, 尤 洋, . 淀山湖河蚬翘嘴红鲌国家级水产种质资源保护区翘嘴鲌产卵场现状[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2733 -2739 .
[7] 邱 宇, 陈英姿, 饶清华, 林秀珠, 陈文花. 基于排污权的闽江流域跨界生态补偿研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2839 -2847 .
[8] 黄晓慧, 王礼力, 陆迁. 资本禀赋对农户水土保持技术价值认知的影响——以黄土高原区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 222 -230 .
[9] 郭贯成, 彭紫新, 周志伟. 工业企业类型对工业用地利用效率的影响研究——基于企业类型宏观视角的分类 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 241 -249 .
[10] 杨 斌, 王占岐, 姚小薇, 张利国. 鄂西北山区土地利用的地形梯度效应与空间结构特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 313 -321 .