长江流域资源与环境 >> 2023, Vol. 32 >> Issue (12): 2638-2648.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202312015

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

汞矿区鹅蛋重金属污染来源解析及风险评价

郭晓玲1,李雪1,王中伟2,王柱红1*   

  1. (1. 贵州医科大学公共卫生与健康学院,贵州 贵阳 550025  2. 广东省生态环境监测中心,广东 广州 510220)
  • 出版日期:2023-12-20 发布日期:2023-12-25

Heavy Metal Pollution Sources and Risk Evaluation of Goose Eggs in Mercury Mining Area

GUO Xiao-ling1, LI Xue1, WANG Zhong-wei2, WANG Zhu-hong1   

  1. (1. School of Public Health, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550025, China; 2. Ecological Environment Monitoring Center, Guangdong,Guangzhou 510220,China)
  • Online:2023-12-20 Published:2023-12-25

摘要: 汞矿区周边环境受汞污染的同时往往伴随着明显的其他重金属污染。为了解汞矿区鹅蛋中重金属污染现状,以贵州务川汞矿区为污染区,贵州安顺为背景区,购买当地鹅蛋各10个。利用ICP-MS分别测定鹅蛋蛋清、蛋黄中Cr、Ni、Cu、Zn、Sr、Mo、Ba和Pb的含量,单因子污染指数法和人体健康风险评价模型评价鹅蛋重金属生态环境风险,主成分分析 (PCA)解析鹅蛋重金属的来源。结果表明:汞矿区鹅蛋蛋清中Cr、Ni、Cu、Zn、Sr、Mo、Ba和Pb含量分别为:0.50、0.15、4.20、36.61、11.29、0.22、19.60和0.040 μg/g,蛋黄中Cr、Ni、Cu、Zn、Sr、Mo、Ba和Pb含量分别为:0.42、0.07、3.04、53.60、5.36、0.37、72.92和0.27 μg/g;安顺背景区鹅蛋蛋清Cr、Ni、Cu、Zn、Sr、Mo、Ba和Pb含量分别为:0.27、0.04、3.93、0.38、1.31、0.11、0.09和0.008 μg/g,鹅蛋蛋黄中Cr、Ni、Cu、Zn、Sr、Mo、Ba和Pb含量分别为:0.20、0.06、1.65、39.67、2.77、0.28、3.98和0.04 μg/g。汞矿区鹅蛋蛋清中Ni、Zn、Ba、Sr和Pb含量, 蛋黄中Zn、Ba、Sr和Pb含量显著高于背景区 (P<0.05),表明矿区鹅蛋受到明显重金属污染。鹅蛋重金属对儿童的潜在健康风险将高于成人,且蛋黄的重金属健康风险大于蛋清;因子分析表明,Hg、Zn、Ba和Pb主要来源为农作物,Ni、Cu和Sr主要来源于受污染的水体。当地居民长期食用受污染的鹅蛋可能存在健康风险,应加强对重金属危害的认知,降低当地鹅蛋食用量。

Abstract: Except mercury (Hg) pollution, Hg mining areas were often characterized with other heavy metal pollutions. To better understand heavy metal pollution level in goose eggs from the Hg mining area, 10 local goose eggs were purchased from Wuchuan in Guizhou (the Hg mining area) and Anshun in Guizhou (the background area). The concentrations of Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, Sr, Mo, Ba and Pb in the egg whites and yolks were determined, followed by the evaluation of ecological and environmental risks of goose egg heavy metals, and the sources of heavy metals in goose eggs were finally analyzed. The results showed that:for Wuchuan eggs, the concentrations of Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, Sr, Mo, Ba and Pb were 0.50, 0.15, 4.20, 36.61, 11.29, 0.22, 19.60 and 0.040 μg/g, respectively in egg whites; The concentrations of Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, Sr, Mo, Ba and Pb in egg yolks were 0.42, 0.07, 3.04, 53.60, 5.36, 0.37, 72.92 and 0.27 μg/g. In Anshun eggs, Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, Sr, Mo, Ba and Pb concentrations of egg whites were 0.27, 0.04, 3.93, 0.38, 1.31, 0.11, 0.09 and 0.008 μg/g, and were 0.20, 0.06, 1.65, 39.67, 2.77, 0.28, 3.98 and 0.04 μg/g, respectively in egg yolks. Unlike Anshun area, the concentrations of Ni, Zn, Ba, Sr and Pb in the egg whites and Zn, Ba, Sr and Pb in the yolks from Wuchuan were significantly higher(P<0.05), indicating that goose eggs from the mining area were significantly contaminated with heavy metals. Moreover, the potential health risk of heavy metals from goose eggs was higher for children than for adults, and egg yolks were higher than from egg whites.Factor analysis illustrated that Hg, Zn, Ba, and Pb were mainly from crops; Ni, Cu and Sr were mainly from contaminated water bodies and aquatic plants. Local residents could be at health risks from long-term consumption of contaminated goose eggs. It was highly suggested that local residentsincrease their awareness of heavy metal pollutions and reduce their consumption of local goose eggs.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 安俞静, 刘静玉, 李 宁, 乔墩墩, 刘梦丽. 中原城市群铁路网络可达性及经济联系格局[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1947 -1957 .
[2] 蒋豫. 太湖流域沉积物中有机氯农药空间分布特征及风险评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[3] 卢德彬 毛婉柳 杨东阳 赵佳楠. 基于多源遥感数据的中国PM2.5变化趋势与影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[4] 胡继亮 熊自洁 张悦 高婷. 2019年2期自然灾害水平对农户投保意愿的影响分析——基于湖北微观调查数据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[5] 陈炳. 长三角城市群生态文明建设与城市化耦合协调发展研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[6] 陈万旭 李江风 冉端. 长江中游城市群土地利用转型和城镇化之间空间关系研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[7] 潘超, 周驰, 苗滕, 刘林峰, 高健, 焦一滢, 李祝, 张佳敏, 王卉君, 徐德雄. 长江流域鄂西四河流大型底栖动物群落结构特征及水质生物学评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2529 -2539 .
[8] 任娟, 王建力, 杨平恒, 詹兆君, . 亚高山旅游景区岩溶地下水水化学动态变化及其影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2548 -2557 .
[9] 孔锋, 方建, 孙劭, 王品, 吕丽莉, . 基于超阈值取样的中国不同重现期降雨强度空间分异特征及强降雨变化模态(1961~2016年)[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 144 -156 .
[10] 魏建瑛, 徐建英, 樊斐斐. 卧龙自然保护区植被覆盖度变化及其对地形因子的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 440 -449 .