长江流域资源与环境 >> 2004, Vol. 13 >> Issue (4): 370-374.

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

低山丘陵区水土保持治理与生态环境效应

陈 良   

  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2004-07-20
  • 通讯作者: 陈 良

WATER AND SOIL CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT WITH THE ECOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT EFFECT IN THE DISTRICT OF LOW MOUNTAINS 

CHEN Liang   

  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2004-07-20
  • Contact: CHEN Liang

摘要: 分析了低山丘陵区水土流失等级分布,水土流失的形成原因及危害,指出低山丘陵区水土流失综合治理要以小流域综合治理为主,阐明小流域水土流失的规律性,以及根据小流域3个地貌单元类型按“三条带”模式进行综合治理:山顶林草防治、山腰经济林带整治、山脚坡改梯治理的技术措施,着重论述综合治理的生态环境效应:明显地保水保土保肥,在降雨量相同的情况下等高种植、坡改梯、封山育林雨强明显小于坡耕地,起始产流时间延迟,径流量减少近2/3,土壤侵蚀量明显比坡耕地少得多。土壤侵蚀携带养分,坡耕地损失量最大,等高种植全氮、全磷的损失量最小;坡改梯有机质、有效氮、速效钾流失量较少,说明坡改梯的保肥效果优于等高种植。林草植被对改善生态系统的环境效应和提高生物多样性功能,为低山丘陵区生态环境恢复和农业可持发展奠定基础。

关键词: 低山丘陵区, 小流域, 水土保持, 生态环境

Abstract: This text analyses the reasons and danger of soil erosion in the district of low mountains and hills, and points out that the comprehensive administration of soil erosion of low mountains and hills district should rely mainly on small basin comprehensive administration. The regularity of small basin soil erosion and the mode for comprehensive administration are explained according to small basin three ground form unit type, that is, woodgrass is prevented on the mountain top; economic forest belt is renovated on the hillside; technological measure that slope is changed to ladder manages on the hillfoot.The paper describes the ecological environment effect of comprehensive administration. When the soil is corroded, it carries the nutrient, with the losing amount of the cultivated land being the biggest and the losing amount of all N and P of the same high planting the least. The losing amount of organic matter, effective nitrogen and quickacting potassium of changeing slope to the ladder is better. It is proved that to protect fertile result of changing the slope to the ladder is better than the same high planting. The woodgrass vegetation improves the environment and raises the biodiversity function of ecosystem. This text will resume and establish the foundation for ecological environment recovery and sustainable agricultural development in the district of low mountains and hills.

Key words: low mountains and hill district, small basin, water and soil conservation, ecological environment

[1] 姜磊, 周海峰, 柏玲. 长江中游城市群经济-城市-社会-环境耦合度空间差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(05): 649-656.
[2] 应弘, 李阳兵. 三峡库区腹地草堂溪小流域土地功能格局变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(02): 227-237.
[3] 龚旭昇, 郭葳, 周玉龙, 邓绪伟, 汪正祥, 李中强. 基于GIS分析的生态清洁小流域治理思路——以陕西省石泉县饶峰河小流域为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(Z1): 78-82.
[4] 林勇明, 葛永刚, 王道杰, 庄建琦, 陈灿, 吴承祯. 山区县乡公路建设对沿线景观格局的影响研究——以昆明市东川区蒋家沟小流域为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(10): 1566-1575.
[5] 杨渺, 谢强, 方自力, 刘孝富, 廖蔚宇, 王萍. “5·12”汶川地震极重灾区生态服务功能恢复总体评估[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(04): 685-694.
[6] 杜耘. 保护长江生态环境,统筹流域绿色发展[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(02): 171-179.
[7] 胡振鹏, 黄晓杏, 傅春, 余达锦. 环鄱阳湖地区旅游产业-城镇化-生态环境交互耦合的定量比较及演化分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(12): 2012-2020.
[8] 段学军, 虞孝感, 邹辉. 长江经济带开发构想与发展态势[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(10): 1621-1629.
[9] 邹辉, 段学军. 长江经济带研究文献分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(10): 1672-1682.
[10] 杨芳, 潘晨, 贾文晓, 刘敏, 义白璐, 象伟宁. 长三角地区生态环境与城市化发展的区域分异性研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(07): 1094-1101.
[11] 韩玉刚, 曹贤忠. 皖江区域城市能级与生态环境协调度的测度和发展趋势研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(06): 909-916.
[12] 高东东, 吴勇, 陈盟, 王春红. 贡嘎山森林系统小流域基流分割与降雨入渗补给计算[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(06): 949-955.
[13] 张梦, 第宝锋, Constantine A. Stamatopoulos, 宋微曦, 王雅潞. 灾变山地环境影响下小流域脆弱性评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(06): 1072-1078.
[14] 张荣天, 焦华富. 泛长江三角洲地区经济发展与生态环境耦合协调关系分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(05): 719-727.
[15] 廖炜, 高超, 刘汉生, 吴宜进. 基于Logistic回归分析的农户参与水土流失治理状况研究——以鄂西地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(05): 892-898.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!