长江流域资源与环境 >> 2014, Vol. 23 >> Issue (01): 32-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201401005

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国七大流域水资源综合管理绩效动态评价

吴丹, 王亚华   

  1. (1.北方工业大学经济管理学院|北京 100144; 2.清华大学公共管理学院,北京 100084)
  • 出版日期:2014-01-20

DYNAMIC PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN SEVEN RIVER BASIN OF CHINA

WU Dan, WANG Yahua   

  1. (1.School of Economics and Management,North China University of Technology,Beijing 100144,China;2.Tsinghua University,School of Public Policy &|Management,Beijing 100084,China
  • Online:2014-01-20

摘要:

通过国内外相关文献研究与实地调研,结合流域水资源管理的社会经济发展目标,提出了流域水资源综合管理绩效评价的内涵,构建了我国七大流域水资源综合管理绩效评价指标体系与动态评价模型。并应用该模型实证分析了1999~2010年我国七大流域水资源综合管理绩效指数动态变化趋势,对水资源综合管理绩效水平优劣进行对比分析,揭示水资源综合管理绩效指数动态变化的动因。评价显示,1999~2010年,七大流域水资源综合管理绩效指数均有不同程度的提升,按提升速度排序依次为海河、黄河、松辽、太湖、珠江、长江、淮河,按相对管理绩效水平排序依次为海河、珠江、黄河、松辽、太湖、长江、淮河;研究表明,水资源综合管理绩效指数受人均用水量、综合耗水率、农业用水比例、万元工业增加值用水量、万元GDP废水排放量、水资源开发利用率的影响较大

Abstract:


Based on literature research and field investigation, the connotation of performance evaluation of water resources management was given, the indicator system of performance evaluation and a dynamic evaluation model of water resources management in seven River Basin of china was designed, with reference to the socioeconomic development objectives of water resources management. The model was used to analyze the changing trend of the performance index of water resources management in 1999-2010, and revealed the causes of its changing trend. Then, the superiority and inferiority of performance level among different drainage areas was comparatively analyzed. Results showed the performance index of water resources management of seven drainage areas in China was improved with different levels during 1999-2010, the order of the growth rate of the performance index is Haihe River, Yellow River, Songliao River, Taihu Lake, Pearl River, Yangtze River, Huaihe River, and the order of relative management performance level is Haihe River, Pearl river, Huanghe river, Songliao river, Taihu Lake, Yangtze river, Huaihe river. During 1999-2003, the highest management performance level is Songliao River Basin. During 2003-2007 and 2007-2010, the highest management performance level is Pearl River Basin, During 1999-2010, the lowest management performance level is Huaihe River Basin. The study also revealed that the performance index of water resources management was greatly influenced by per capita water consumption, comprehensive water consumption rate, agricultural water proportion, water use per industrial GDP, waste water discharge per GDP, and utilization ratio of water resources

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨 选. 国内外典型水治理模式及对武汉水治理的借鉴[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(5): 584 .
[2] 任雪梅,徐永辉,周 彬,杨达源. 宜宾—重庆段川江高阶地物质来源的定量分析——判别分析在重矿物分析中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 330 -334 .
[3] 李恒鹏,杨桂山,刘晓玫,万荣荣. 流域土地利用变化的长周期水文效应及管理策略[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 450 -455 .
[4] 廖顺宝,李泽辉. 四川省人口分布与土地利用的关系及人口数据空间化试验[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(6): 557 -561 .
[5] 徐天宝, 彭静, 李翀. 葛洲坝水利工程对长江中游生态水文特征的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(1): 72 -75 .
[6] 王红娟,姜加虎,黄 群. 东洞庭湖湿地景观变化研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 732 .
[7] 罗小龙, 陈雯, 金志丰. 南京城郊结合部拓展的机制、问题与对策[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 175 .
[8] 蒲志仲. 水资源所有权问题研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 561 .
[9] 游文荪| 丁惠君*| 许新发. 鄱阳湖水生态安全现状评价与趋势研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(12): 1173 .
[10] 王立辉, 黄进良, 孙俊英. 湖北省农情遥感速报系统的设计与实现[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(z1): 190 .