长江流域资源与环境 >> 2014, Vol. 23 >> Issue (02): 294-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201402020

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    

西南5省市极端气候指数时空分布规律研究

刘琳|徐宗学   

  1. (北京师范大学水科学研究院水沙科学教育部重点实验室|北京 100875)
  • 出版日期:2014-02-20

SPATIOTEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE EXTREME CLIMATE INDICES IN THE FIVE SOUTHWESTERN PROVINCES OF CHINA

LIU Lin|XU Zongxue   

  1. (Key Laboratory of Water and Sediment Sciences of Ministry of Education,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China
  • Online:2014-02-20

摘要:

利用西南5省市的33个气象站,采用MK检验和滑动t检验等方法对极端气候指数的时空分布规律进行分析。结果表明:在时间尺度上,西南5省市60 a来极端降水指数除PRCPTOT和CDD外均呈现出较弱的上升趋势,表明虽然该地区降水总量略有减少,但最大日降水量和降水强度却有所增加;极端气温指数中TN10、TX10和DTR呈现出明显的下降趋势,其他7指数均呈上升趋势,表明西南5省市有变暖的趋势,且昼夜温差变小;极端降水指数多在20世纪90年代以后发生突变。在空间尺度上,西南5省市与降水量相关的极端降水指数呈现出西北到东南递增的分布规律,四川和云南部分地区处于低值区,而其连续干旱日数(CDD)却处于高值区,因此这两省的干旱风险较高;极端气温指数分布规律不明显,冷、暖系列指数表明云南省气温最高,贵州省最低,结合气温日较差(DTR)和暖期持续天数(WSDI)分析发现云南省发生极端气候事件的风险较大

Abstract:

The data at 33 meteorological stations in five southwestern provinces including Sichuan, Yunnan, Guangxi,Guizhou and Chongqing were used to analyze the spatiotemporal distribution of the extreme climate indices.The MK test and moving ttest methods were used to analyze the jump years and the trend of the extreme climate indices.GIS was used to draw the distribution maps.It was found that extreme precipitation indices except PRCPTOT and CDD in the five southwestern provinces showed a weak upward trend during the past 60 years; precipitation amount of the region decreased slightly,while the maximum daily precipitation amount and intensity of precipitation increased.It indicated that the total precipitation in the region decreased slightly,while the precipitation was more concentrated.It was confirmed by the increase of R95,Rx1d,Rx5d and SDII.The jump for most of extreme precipitation indices occurred in the 1990s,after that,the variation trend of extreme precipitation indices was obvious.Extreme air temperature indices including TN10,TX10 and DTR showed a downward trend,and other 7 indices all showed a upward trend,especially,the warm night index (TN90) and warm sustained days index (WSDI) significantly increased.It indicated that the five southwestern provinces have shown a warming trend,and diurnal temperature difference was smaller.At the spatial scale,extreme precipitation indices associated with precipitation in the five southwestern provinces showed an increasing trend from northwest to southeast.The high value and the low value region are easy to find.Those indices including total precipitation of wet day (PROPTOT),maximum daily precipitation and maximum fiveday precipitation showed a high value in Guangxi,Guizhou and Chongqing.It indicated that the precipitation amount here was more than other region and the precipitation was more centralized.Those indices showed a small value in Sichuan and part of the Yunnan province,and the continuous days of drought (CDD) showed a high value.Therefore,drought risk in these two provinces was higher,apart from the influence factor of topography and human activity.Spatial distribution of extreme air temperature indices was not significant.Cold extremes indicated that Yunnan Province showed the highest air temperature,and Guizhou Province showed the minimum air temperature.Warm extremes distribution map generally presented an increasing trend from west to east in the region.The two indices showed a high value in Guangxi and Chongqing,indicating a higher temperature.The rule of diurnal temperature range ( DTR ) distribution was obvious,western Sichuan and Yunnan had a much higher value than that in the eastern Chongqing,Guizhou and Guangxi.Maerkang station of Sichuan showed the highest value of DTR,up to 1601℃,Lancang station of Yunnanalso reached as high as 13℃.Warm sustained days index (WSDI) distribution was different with other indices,and it had no obvious regularity.Most areas of Yunnan province showed a high value,for example,the WSDI in Deqin station was up to 20 d.It was found that the risk of extreme climate events will be higher in Yunnan Province from our comprehensive analysis of extreme climate indices

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 陶豫萍,吴 宁,罗 鹏,刘 兵. 森林对污染物(SO2-4)的过滤器效应研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 628 -632 .
[2] 潘竟虎. 近15年来长江源区土地利用变化及其生态环境效应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(3): 310 -315 .
[3] 陈永柏,. 三峡工程对长江流域可持续发展的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(2): 109 -113 .
[4] 张丽旭,蒋晓山,赵 敏,李志恩. 长江口洋山海域表层沉积物重金属的富积及其潜在生态风险评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 351 .
[5] 葛刚, 徐燕花, 赵磊, 吴志强, 吴兰. 鄱阳湖典型湿地土壤有机质及氮素空间分布特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(06): 619 .
[6] 乔伟峰|孙在宏|邵繁荣, 倪婷|冯松松|张果. 高度城市化区域土地利用结构演化与驱动因素分析——以苏州市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(05): 557 .
[7] 马仁锋| 李加林| 庄佩君|杨晓平| 李伟芳. 长江三角洲地区海洋产业竞争力评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(08): 918 .
[8] 潘兴侠 |何宜庆 |胡晓峰. 区域生态效率评价及其空间计量分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(5): 640 .
[9] 朱明勇, 谭淑端, 张全发. 基于GIS和USLE的小流域土壤侵蚀定量评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(12): 1572 .
[10] 胡洋|余辉|李中强. 湿沉降对湖泊水质及初级生产力的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(01): 75 .