长江流域资源与环境 >> 2014, Vol. 23 >> Issue (08): 1139-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201408014

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

负荷历时曲线法在赣江流域TMDL计划中的应用

万金保,高园,万莉   

  1. (南昌大学环境与化学工程学院鄱阳湖环境与资源利用教育部重点实验室,江西 南昌 330047)
  • 出版日期:2014-08-20

APPLICATION OF LOAD DURATION CURVE METHOD IN THE GANJIANG RIVER TMDL PROGRAMME

WAN Jinbao, GAO Yuan,WAN Li   

  1. (Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Poyang Lake Environment and Resource Utilization,College of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330047, China
  • Online:2014-08-20

摘要:

赣江流域是鄱阳湖水系的第一大流域,由于人口密度大、企业多,使得赣江流域的水环境日趋严重。为此,以赣江流域为对象,选择外洲站点为代表性站点,绘制赣江流域污染物的流量历时曲线和负荷历时曲线;并分析污染物最大日负荷的变化特征,赣江流域各月、各季节和各水情期的污染物最大日负荷波动较大,各时间段的污染物最大日负荷呈负偏态分布;最后比较了赣江流域现状负荷通量和允许负荷通量,发现赣江流域总体水质较好,COD有部分盈余,但NH3N和TP的现状负荷已接近最大允许负荷,尤其在丰水期,说明面源对赣江流域的NH3N和TP的贡献较大,赣江流域的污染物控制应以面源控制为主

Abstract:

Ganjiang River Basin is the biggest basin of the Poyang Lake water system. Due to the large population density and a lot of enterprises, water environment in the Ganjiang River Basin has become increasingly serious. This study takes Ganjiang River Basin as the research object. We chose Waizhou site as a representative site, and used the Load Duration Curve method to draw the basin pollutant flow duration curve, and load duration curve, and obtain the maximum daily load of pollutants under different guarantee rate. We analyzed the change features of pollutant maximum daily load, and found that pollutant maximum daily load fluctuation during each month, season and water phase was bigger, each period of pollutant maximum daily load showed negatively skewed distribution, formulating different periods of pollutant total control is of great significance. Months average maximum daily load range for COD was 1 38006 t/d-7 42893 t/d, the strongest average daily pollutant carrying capacity was June, the weakest was December. The sequence of the strength of the pollutant carrying capacity of each season: summer > spring > autumn > winter; each season average pollutant maximum daily load ratio was: 3.08〖DK〗∶3.01〖DK〗∶1.24〖DK〗∶1. The sequence of the strength of the pollutant carrying capacity of each water phase was: wet season>level period 2> level period 1> dry season, and each water phase average pollutant maximum daily load ratio was: 386〖DK〗∶222〖DK〗∶151〖DK〗∶1. Water phase change characteristics can more intuitively reflect the pollutant maximum daily load changes, and discrimination of pollutant maximum daily load among wet season, level period, dry season was bigger. Finally,we compared the present load of Ganjiang river basin and allowable load fluxes, found that the water quality of Ganjiang river basin was better in general, COD had a part of surplus, but the present load of TP and NH3N had been close to the maximum allowable load, especially in the high flow period. It indicate that nonpoint source information of the Ganjiang river basin of NH3N and TP is larger, the regulated pollutants of Ganjiang river basin should give priority to nonpoint source, and focus on the control of NH3N and TP

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张 强.
近40年来长江流域水沙变化趋势及可能影响因素探讨
[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 257 .
[2] 袁旭音. 污染河道的常量和微量元素特征及指示意义[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 270 .
[3] 张其成,姚亦锋,蒋成煜. 南京城市滨江带功能演变及现代景观规划研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 30 -34 .
[4] 胡鸿兴,康洪莉,贡国鸿,朱觅辉5,郑文勤5,吴法清,何定富,李振文,耿 栋5. 湖北省湿地冬季水鸟多样性研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 422 -428 .
[5] 吴之坤, 张长芹,黄 媛,张敬丽,孙宝玲,. 长江上游玉龙雪山植物物种多样性形成的探讨[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 48 -53 .
[6] 刘盛和. 中国城市化水平省际差异的成因探析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(6): 530 -535 .
[7] 李思悦 刘文治 顾胜 韩鸿印 张全发. null[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(3): 275 -280 .
[8] 杨, 琳, 黄介生, 李大文, 黄志强. 控制排水条件下土壤氮素的运移[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(11): 1063 .
[9] 李 彬,武 恒. 安徽省耕地资源数量变化及其对粮食安全的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(12): 1115 .
[10] 龚大洁, 吴洪超, 侯 峰, 漆朝晖. 甘肃康县棘腹蛙种群资源调查与分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(12): 1162 .