长江流域资源与环境 >> 2014, Vol. 23 >> Issue (12): 1767-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201412018

• 雾霾专栏 • 上一篇    下一篇

江苏霾灾害风险与地区差异研究

田心如,陈广昌,武艳,王伟丽   

  1. (1.江苏省气象台,江苏 南京 210008;2.江苏天安防雷工程有限责任公司,江苏 南京 210009;3.徐州市气象局,江苏 徐州 221002
  • 出版日期:2014-12-20

STUDY OF HAZE RISK AND THE DIFFERENCE OF HAZE AMONG ALL AREAS IN JIANGSU

TIAN Xinru1,CHEN Guangchang2,WU Yan3,WANG Weili1   

  1.   (1.Jiangsu Meteorological Observatory, Nanjing 210008,China; 2.Jiangsu TianAn Lightningproof Engineering Co.,LTD, Nanjing 210009,China; 3. Xuzhou Meteorological Bureau, Xuzhou 221002,China
  • Online:2014-12-20

摘要:

利用江苏省69个地面气象观测站1980~2012年的气象资料,采用适当的方法定义了霾时概念,讨论了重度、中度、轻度及轻微霾时数的时空分布特征。根据霾灾害特点,以区县为评估单元,综合考虑了致灾因子危险性、孕灾环境敏感性、承载体易损性和防灾减灾能力4个因素,选取中度霾时数、重度霾时数、水域面积、植被面积、人口密度、公路里程、公共财政支出、每万人拥有医生数等8个因子作为评估的主要指标,利用层次分析法建立霾灾害风险评估模型,并借助于GIS分析工具,进行了霾灾害风险区划

Abstract:

Based on the data collected from 69 surface observation stations during 1961- 2012 in Jiangsu province,using proper measures to define the concept of haze hours,the temporal and spatial distribution features of severe,moderate,mild and slight haze hours are discussed in the research.According to the characteristics of haze disasters, the administrative regions (districts and counties) are taken as the basic evaluation unit, considering four factors such as the hazard risk, disaster pregnant environment sensitivity, vulnerability and disaster prevention and reduction capacity. This study selects eight factors including the moderate haze hours, severe haze hours, water area, vegetation area, population density, road mileage, public finance expenditure, the number of doctors per million people possessing as the evaluation indexes, uses the analytic hierarchy process to establish a risk assessment model, and with the help of GIS analysis tool, the haze disaster risk regionalization is given. The research shows that the slight haze is the most haze weather in Jiangsu province, with proportion of 77% in all haze weather. The frequency of severe and moderate haze weather is lower, with proportion of 2% and 4% respectively. The trend of annual haze hours of every grade is identical, rising slightly during 1980-2010, and obviously during 2011-2012. The rising trend of slight haze is most obvious, followed by the mild haze. There are common spatial distribution characteristics of all grade haze. West area along the Yangtze River , local area in the north and the southeast of Jiangsu province are the high value area, Nantong is the low value area, and the area facing to the sea and its altitude is low. The natural intensity of haze (the hours of severe and moderate haze) and the risk assessment results of haze disasters are correspondent in the geographical distribution. West area along the Yangtze River and local area in north of Huaibei are the high value areas, showing the correctness and the rationality of the assessment methods. But the haze disaster risk also considered three factors such as disaster pregnant environment sensitivity, vulnerability and disaster prevention and reduction capacity. Thus, the distribution of the result of risk assessment and the natural strength of haze are different. Haze risk level is medium in the area such as the south of the Huaihe, part of Suzhou, Yangzhou, and Zhenjiang because of densely population and developed traffic, although moderate and severe haze hours are less in these area. In northern of Huaibei, some area such as Xinyi, Suqian and other places, the haze risk level is higher, because water and vegetation area is relatively less, disaster prevention and mitigation ability is relatively lower

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 娜,许有鹏, 陈 爽. 苏州城市化进程对降雨特征影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 335 -339 .
[2] 孙维侠, 赵永存, 黄 标, 廖菁菁, 王志刚, 王洪杰. 长三角典型地区土壤环境中Se的空间变异特征及其与人类健康的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 113 .
[3] 胡大伟,卞新民,许 泉. 基于ANN的土壤重金属分布和污染评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 475 -479 .
[4] 张洁| 张志斌| 孙欣欣. 云南省矿产资源开发利用中的主要环境问题[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 61 -65 .
[5] 时连强,李九发,应 铭,左书华,徐海根. 长江口没冒沙演变过程及其对水库工程的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 458 -464 .
[6] 邹小兵,曾 婷,TRINA MACKIE,肖尚友,夏之宁. 嘉陵江下游江段春季浮游藻类特征及污染现状[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 612 .
[7] 张代钧,许丹宇,任宏洋,曹海彬,郑 敏,刘惠强. 长江三峡水库水污染控制若干问题[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 605 -610 .
[8] 黄 峰 魏 浪 李 磊 朱 伟. 乌江干流中上游水电梯级开发水温累积效应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(4): 337 .
[9] 胡鸿兴, 张岩岩, 何伟, 田蓉, 钟鑫, 韩世松, 李思思, 王俊杰陈文方, 杨阳, 陈侈, 邓晗, 文英, 崔雅婷, 李茜,  王璇, 彭菁菁, 高鑫, 唐义. 神农架大九湖泥炭藓沼泽湿地对镉(Ⅱ)、铜(Ⅱ)、铅(Ⅱ)、锌(Ⅱ)的净化模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(11): 1050 .
[10] 王肇磊, 贺新枝. 晚清时期湖北自然灾害的治理及其经验教训[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(11): 1080 .