长江流域资源与环境 >> 2015, Vol. 24 >> Issue (01): 74-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201501010

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

岷江上游水电开发特点及其空间格局分析

李明, 傅斌, 王玉宽, 彭培好, 严坤   

  1. (1.中国科学院水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所,四川 成都 610041; 2.中国科学院大学,北京 100049; 3.成都理工大学生态资源与景观研究所,四川 成都 610059
  • 出版日期:2015-01-20

CHARACTERISTICS AND SPATIAL PATTERNS OF HYDROPOWER DEVELOPMENT IN THE UPPER MINJIANG RIVER BASIN

LI Ming, FU Bin, WANG Yukuan, PENG Peihao, YAN Kun   

  1. (1.Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China;2.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3.Institute of Ecological Resources and Landscape Architecture, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
  • Online:2015-01-20

摘要:

研究流域的水电开发类型与空间格局,可为水库群的累积环境影响评价、流域水电优化布局等提供科学参考。在流域分割的基础上,对岷江上游水电站的基本类型、水电站的空间分布格局进行了全面分析,并构建水电开发率、水电开发密度和水电开发强度3个指标对流域水电开发程度作出综合评价。结果表明岷江上游流域水电站类型以高水头低闸坝的引水式小水电为主,高坝大库相对较少。梯级水电开发已拓展至岷江三级支流,汶川—都江堰河段是干流水电开发程度最高的河段,杂谷脑河是水电开发程度最高的一级支流流域。岷江上游流域的水电开发率远高于全国平均水平,梯级水电开发密度大于国内主要河流。农村小水电占水电站总数的82%,梯级农村小水电对生态环境的累积影响是将来值得深入探讨的问题

Abstract:

Studying hydropower development types and spatial patterns is useful to analyze the cumulative effects of reservoirs and optimal layout of hydropower in watersheds. Despite a few literatures has discussed the assessment method of hydropower development level, the evaluation method is still given priority to a single index on hydropower development rate. However, the single index cannot truthfully reflect the spatial distribution of hydropower station in a whole watershed, and is hard to reflect the differences of hydropower development in different river sections. These shortcomings are not conductive to the study of cumulative effects that may be caused by cascade hydropower stations. Based on the separation of the whole basin, we analyzed the types and the spatial patterns of hydropower located in the upper Minjiang River Basin. Then, we built three indices, namely, hydropower development rate, hydropower development density and hydropower development intensity, to comprehensively assess the hydropower development degree of study area. Finally, we compared these indices across many river basins in China. The results were as follows. (1) The main type of hydropower plant in study area is not large hydropower but small diversion hydropower with high water head and low dam. (2) Cascade hydropower development has been expanded to the third level tributaries. The pattern of intensive cascade hydropower development may give rise to the disappearance of some aquatic organisms in “dewatered” river sections, thus may result in the gradual evolution of aquatic ecosystems into seasonal terrestrial ecosystems. It may also speed up the flood collection rate, an affect the safety of flood controlling. (3) The hydropower development rate, hydropower development density and hydropower development intensity of Zagunao River, a main tributary of the study area, were as high as 99%, 057 and 017, respectively, making it the highest developed tributary. WenchuanDujiangyan section is the highest developed section of main stream. (4) Compared with the average level of hydropower development rate in China, the intensity of cascade hydropower development is much greater than that of other main rivers in China. (5) As the main hydropower type of study area, the biophysical cumulative effects caused by small hydropower deserve further study

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 聂钠, 于坤香. 我国世界自然遗产地旅游业环境经济核算思路[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(2): 121 .
[2] 曹银贵,王 静,程 烨,刘爱霞,许 宁,郝 银,饶彩霞. 三峡库区土地利用变化与影响因子分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 748 .
[3] 徐俊杰, 何 青, 刘 红, 陈吉余. 2006年长江特枯径流特征及其原因初探[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(5): 716 .
[4] 游庆龙. 三江源地区1961~2005年气温极端事件变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 232 .
[5] 吴炳方,罗治敏. 基于遥感信息的流域生态系统健康评价——以大宁河流域为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(1): 102 -106 .
[6] 姜加虎, 黄 群, 孙占东. 长江中下游湖泊保护和管理的若干建议[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(1): 40 -43 .
[7] 郝红升,李克锋,李然,赵再兴. 取水口高程对过渡型水库水温分布结构的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(1): 21 -25 .
[8] 刘承良, 田 颖, 梁 滨,5. 武汉城市圈产业经济的系统性分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(1): 1 .
[9] 伍新木,廖 丹,严 瑾. 制度创新:依托武汉建设长江中游城市群[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 1 -6 .
[10] 李翀,廖文根,彭静,叶柏生. 宜昌站1900~2004年生态水文特征变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(1): 76 -80 .