长江流域资源与环境 >> 2015, Vol. 24 >> Issue (07): 1110-1118.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201507005

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于水生态功能区的巢湖环湖带生态服务功能评价

张志明, 高俊峰, 闫人华   

  1. 中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所, 江苏 南京 210008
  • 收稿日期:2014-06-17 修回日期:2014-07-31 出版日期:2015-07-20
  • 作者简介:张志明(1983~),男,助理研究员,博士,主要从事资源利用与生态环境效应方面的研究.E-mail:zmzhang@niglas.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项"巢湖流域水生态功能三级、四级分区研究"(2012ZX07501002-008)和"湖带生态环境建设与区域经济发展总体方案"(2012ZX07103003-04-01)

ASSESSMENT OF ECOSYSTEM SERVICES BASED ON AQUATIC ECOREGION OF THE AREA SURROUNDING THE CHAOHU LAKE

ZHANG Zhi-ming, GAO Jun-feng, YAN Ren-hua   

  1. Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China
  • Received:2014-06-17 Revised:2014-07-31 Online:2015-07-20
  • Contact: 高俊峰,E-mail:gaojunf@niglas.ac.cn E-mail:gaojunf@niglas.ac.cn

摘要: 水生态功能区被认为是流域生态环境保护、治理与修复的基本单元,以其为基础进行生态服务功能评估对于流域内的土地利用结构优化配置、生态环境保护、治理与修复等都有重要的意义。选取巢湖环湖带,采用物质量的方法,对其12种生态服务功能进行评价,其中陆域生态系统4种,水域生态系统8种。研究结果表明:(1)研究区生态系统服务功能空间差异明显,南部和东北部较高,西北部和东南部较低;而研究区单位面积生态服务功能西部较高,东部较低;(2)生态服务功能总量较高的区域,其单位面积生态服务功能并不一定高;(3)环湖带生态系统服务功能的管理和恢复既要考虑生态服务功能总量的大小,也要考虑单位面积生态服务功能的大小,依据实际情况区别对待,生态服务功能较强的地区,应积极发挥其生态功能的优势,在保护与治理并重的情况下充分发挥其生态服务功能;生态服务功能较弱的地区,应采取一定的措施,在保护的基础上对其生态服务功能进行恢复。

关键词: 生态服务功能, 水生态功能区, 量化评估, 巢湖环湖带

Abstract: Aquatic ecoregion is considered a geographic unit for conservation, treatment and ecological restoration at basin scales. According to the method of material valuation and the geographic information system technique, assessment of ecosystem services based on aquatic ecoregion is important for optimization of land use, ecological environmental protection, treatment and restoration. The area surrounding the Chaohu Lake was selected as the study area in this paper. Twelve types of ecosystem services were quantified in this study, which are water regulation, water purification, soil protection, and habitat maintenance in terrestrial ecosystems and water supply, aquatic product production, water storage, water purification, climate regulation, carbon sequestration and oxygen release, waterlogging regulation, and biodiversity protection in water ecosystems, respectively. The results indicated that: (1) There were significant spatial differences of ecosystem services in the study area, which was higher in the south and northeast of study area, and lower in the northwest and southeast. Ecosystem services per unit area were higher in the west and lower in the east. (2) The areas where ecosystem service functions were high, may not be high in per unit area of them. Regulating services in per unit area in terrestrial ecosystems was higher in the southwest and northwest of study area, and lower in the northeast and southeast. Supporting services in per unit area in terrestrial ecosystems was higher in the south and north of study area, and lower in the east and west. Moreover, supporting services in per unit area in water ecosystems was higher in the west and southeast of the study area, and lower in the north. Regulating services in per unit area in water ecosystems was higher in the southwest and northwest of the study area, and lower in the south and north. (3) Management and restoration of ecosystem services should consider not only the total ecological service functions, but also the per unit area of them. According to the actual situation, the area where ecosystem service functions are higher, should actively pay equal attention to its ecosystem service function under the condition of the protection and management. On the other hand, its ecosystem service functions should be restored on the basis of the protection where ecosystem service functions are lower. The results have great significance to the development of regional industry and arrangement of land use among the agriculture, forestry, fishery and other industries. In order to coordinate and cooperate with each industry to form the development of the integrated system, it can be achieved the protection, optimization and rational utilization of natural resources and renewable natural resources.

Key words: ecosystem services, aquatic ecoregion, quantitative assessment, the area surrounding the Chaohu Lake

中图分类号: 

  • X171.1
[1] COSTANZA R,ARGE R,RUDOLF DE G,et al.The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J].Nature,1997,387:253-260.
[2] DAILY G C.Nature's service:societal dependence on natural ecosystem[M].Washington D C:Island Press.1997.
[3] 虞依娜,彭少麟.生态系统服务价值评估的研究进展[J].生态环境学报,2010,19(9):2246-2252.
[4] 李双成,刘金龙,张才玉,等.生态系统服务研究动态及地理学研究范式[J].地理学报,2011,66(12):1618-1630.
[5] BROUWER F,TAGLIAFIERRO C,HUTCHINSON G.Ecosystem services and rural land management[J].Environmental Science & Policy,2013,32:1-4.
[6] 欧阳志云,王效科,苗 鸿,等.中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究[J].生态学报,1999,19(5):607-613.
[7] 杨怀宇,王春晓,郭宗香,等.池塘养殖生态系统空气调节服务价值的实证研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2009,18(5):432-438.
[8] 赵金龙,王泺鑫,韩海荣,等.森林生态系统服务功能价值评估研究进展与趋势[J].生态学杂志,2013,32(8):2229-2237.
[9] LOVELL S T,TAYLOR J R.Supplying urban ecosystem services through multifunctional green infrastructure in the United States[J].Landscape Ecology,2013,28:1447-1463.
[10] NELSON E J,KAREIVA P,RUCKELSHAUS M,et al.Climate change's impact on key ecosystem services and the human well-being they support in the US[J].Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment,2013,11:483-493.
[11] 叶延琼,章家恩,陈丽丽,等.广州市水生态系统服务价值[J].生态学杂志,2013,32(5):1303-1310.
[12] 陈国阶,何锦峰,涂建军.长江上游生态服务功能区域差异研究[J].山地学报,2005,23(4):406-412.
[13] 高俊峰,高永年.太湖流域水生态功能分区[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2012:109-124.
[14] 高永年,高俊峰,陈坰烽,等.太湖流域水生态功能三级分区[J].地理研究,2012,31(11):1941-1951.
[15] 董川永,高俊峰.太湖流域西部圩区陆地生态系统维持和调节功能量化评估[J].自然资源学报,2014,29(3):420-430.
[16] 董川永,高俊峰.太湖流域西部圩区水域生态服务功能量化评估[J].中国科学院大学学报,2014,31(5),610-616.
[17] GAO Y N,GAO J F,CHEN J F,et al.Regionalizing aquatic ecosystems based on the river subbasin taxonomy concept and spatial clustering techniques[J].International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,2011,8:4367-4385.
[18] 赵英时.遥感应用分析原理与方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2003:173-183.
[19] 刘纪远.中国资源环境遥感宏观调查与动态研究[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1996.
[20] 李文华.生态系统服务功能价值评估的理论、方法与应用[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008:280-300.
[21] 王绍强,朱松丽,周成虎.中国土壤土层厚度的空间变异性特征[J].地理研究,2001,20(2):161-169.
[22] 白晓华.太湖山地强降雨事件中不同水体的氮磷负荷分析[J].环境科学导刊,2009,28(4):71-74.
[23] 高照良,田红卫,王 冬,等.水土保持工程措施生态服务功能的物质量化分析[J].生态经济,2012,11:149-153,170.
[24] 欧阳志云,赵同谦,赵景柱,等.海南岛生态系统生态调节功能及其生态经济价值研究[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(8):1395-1402.
[25] 杨海清,吕淑华,李秀艳,等.城市绿地对雨水径流污染物的削减作用[J].华东师范大学学报(自然科学版),2008,2:41-47.
[26] 杨丽韫,李文华,彭 奎,等.太湖流域城镇绿地系统水生态服务功能研究[J].资源科学,2011,33(2):217-222.
[27] 李 振,李 浩,曾宪曙,等.广东鹤山三种南亚热带人工林的生态系统服务价值动态[J].生态环境学报,2013,22(6):967-975.
[28] 王 斌,张 彪,王建锋,等.太湖流域水生态系统服务及其空间差异[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(2):215-221.
[29] 米文秀,谢 冰.城市绿地对雨水径流中污染物削减效果研究[J].上海化工,2007,32(10):2-4.
[30] 王小治,尹微琴,单玉华,等.太湖地区湿沉降中氮磷输入量——以常熟生态站为例[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(10):2487-2492.
[31] 邬建国.景观生态学——格局、过程、尺度与等级[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2007,106-124.
[32] 卜兆宏,唐万龙,杨林章,等.水土流失定量遥感方法新进展及其在太湖流域的应用[J].土壤学报,2003,40(1):1-9.
[33] 李菲菲.平原圩区水体生态服务功能定量分析方法研究[D].扬州:扬州大学硕士学位论文,2008,27-32.
[34] 高俊峰,毛 锐.太湖平原圩区分类及圩区洪涝分析——以湖西区为例[J].湖泊科学,1993,5(4):307-315.
[35] 王 欢,韩 霜,邓红兵,等.香溪河河流生态系统服务功能评价[J].生态学报,2006,26(9):2971-2978.
[36] 合肥市统计局,国家统计局合肥调查队.合肥统计年鉴[J].北京:中国统计出版社,2012.
[1] 杨世凡, 安裕伦, 王培彬, 马良瑞, 胡锋, 孙泉忠. 贵州赤水河流域生态红线区划分研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(08): 1405-1411.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李崇明,黄真理. 三峡水库入库污染负荷研究(Ⅱ)——蓄水后污染负荷预测[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 97 -106 .
[2] 李 佳,李思悦,谭 香,张全发. 南水北调中线工程总干渠沿线经过河流水质评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(5): 693 .
[3] 邹丽敏, 王 超, 冯士龙. 玄武湖沉积物中重金属污染的潜在生物毒性风险评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 280 .
[4] 张 强.
近40年来长江流域水沙变化趋势及可能影响因素探讨
[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 257 .
[5] 袁旭音. 污染河道的常量和微量元素特征及指示意义[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 270 .
[6] 张其成,姚亦锋,蒋成煜. 南京城市滨江带功能演变及现代景观规划研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 30 -34 .
[7] 胡鸿兴,康洪莉,贡国鸿,朱觅辉5,郑文勤5,吴法清,何定富,李振文,耿 栋5. 湖北省湿地冬季水鸟多样性研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 422 -428 .
[8] 陈 爽,王 进,. 太湖流域城市化水平及外来人口影响测评[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(6): 524 -529 .
[9] 张文广,胡远满, 刘 淼,杨兆平,常 禹,李秀珍,杨 孟,问青春, . 基于土地利用变化的生态服务价值损益估算——以岷江上游地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 821 .
[10] 吴之坤, 张长芹,黄 媛,张敬丽,孙宝玲,. 长江上游玉龙雪山植物物种多样性形成的探讨[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 48 -53 .