生态福利绩效视角下的上海市可持续发展评价研究

doi:10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201601002

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 资源与环境约束加剧的大背景下,在"生态门槛"内实现社会福利最大化的可持续发展模式是未来城市发展的必然选择。从生态福利绩效视角出发,选取人均生态足迹和人类发展指数构建城市可持续发展评价指标体系,并采用DEA方法计算二者的投入产出效率,对上海市1999~2012年可持续发展水平进行多维度、动态化的实证分析。研究发现:①上海市人类发展指数、人均生态足迹与经济发展同步增长,但人均生态足迹水平大于生态承载能力,处于严重"生态赤字"状态,并不断恶化;②上海市多数年份的生态福利绩效处于DEA无效状态,且2005年以来进入规模收益递减通道。最后提出政策建议。

关键词: 生态福利绩效, 可持续发展, 生态足迹, 人类发展指数, DEA

Abstract: Under the condition of limited resources and environment protection, there is an urgent need to conduct sustainable urban development to maximize societal wellbeing within the "Ecological Threshold". This research is conducted by appraising the efficiency of sustainable development in Shanghai from the year of 1999 to 2012, from the perspective of ecological wellbeing performance based on the DEA models. In this research, the input index is the ecological footprint per capita, and HDI is the output index. The results demonstrate that a higher level of economic growth along with a higher cost of environment and performance in most years are DEA inefficient except for the year of 2004. Last, some constructive suggestions will be proposed for Shanghai's sustainable development in the next coming years.

Key words: ecological wellbeing performance, sustainable urban development, HDI, ecological footprint, DEA

中图分类号:

F015

龙亮军, 王霞, 郭兵. 生态福利绩效视角下的上海市可持续发展评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(01): 9-15.

LONG Liang-jun, WANG Xia, GUO Bing. EVALUATION ON SUSTAINABLE URBAN DEVELOPMENT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF ECOLOGICAL WELLBEING PERFORMANCE——A CASE STUDY OF SHANGHAI[J]. RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE YANGTZE BASIN, 2016, 25(01): 9-15.

参考文献

[1] BRUNTLAND G H. Our Common Future:the World Commission on Environment and Development[M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 1987.
[2] 诸大建, 张帅. 生态福利绩效与深化可持续发展的研究[J]. 同济大学学报(社会科学版), 2014, 25(5):106-115.[ZHU D J, ZHANG S. Ecological wellbeing performance and further research on sustainable development[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Social Science Section), 2014, 25(5):106-115.]
[3] OECD. Core Set of Indicators for Environmental Performance Reviews[M]. Paris:OECD, 1993.
[4] DALY H E, COBB J B. For the Common Good:Redirecting the Economy Toward Community, the Environment and A Sustainable Future[M]. Boston:Beacon Press, 1989:401-455.
[5] COBB C, HALSTEAD T, ROWE J. If the GDP is up, why is America down?[Z]. The Atlantic Monthly, 1995:59-78.
[6] United Nations Development Programme. Human Development Report 1990[M]. New York:Oxford University Press, 1990:10.
[7] SEN A K. Distribution, transitivity and little's welfare criteria[J]. The Economic Journal, 1963, 73(292):771-778.
[8] REES W E. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity:what Urban economics leaves out[J]. Environment and Urbanization, 1992, 4(2):121-130.
[9] The Global Leaders of Tomorrow Environment Task Force. 2002 Environmental sustainability index[R]. Davos, Switzerland:World Economic Forum Annual Meeting, 2002.
[10] SUPACHET C. The evaluation of the sustainable human development:a cross-country analysis employing slack-Based DEA[J]. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2014(20):3-11.
[11] MARKS N, ABDALLAH S, SIMMS A, et al. The Unhappy Planet Index:An Index of Human Well-being and Environmental Impact[M]. London:New Economics Foundation, 2006.
[12] ABRAMOVITZ M, SCITOVSKY T, INKELES A. Economic growth and its discontents[J]. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 1973, 27(1):11-27.
[13] DODDS S. Towards a ‘science of sustainability’:improving the way ecological economics understands human well-being[J]. Ecological Economics, 1997, 23(2):95-111.
[14] 诸大建, 张帅. 生态福利绩效及其与经济增长的关系研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2014, 24(9):59-62.[ZHU D J, ZHANG S. Resource on ecological wellbeing performance and its relationship with economic growth[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2014, 24(9):59-62.]
[15] DALY H E. The world dynamics of economic growth:the economics of the steady state[J]. American Economic Review, 1974, 64(2):15-21.
[16] 罗迈. 基于DEA的房地产业投入效率分析[J]. 管理世界, 2014(9):178-179.
[17] COOK W D, SEIFORD L M. Data envelopment analysis (DEA):thirty years on[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 192(1):1-17.
[18] 熊婵, 买忆媛, 何晓斌, 等. 基于DEA方法的中国高科技创业企业运营效率研究[J]. 管理科学, 2014, 27(2):26-37.[XIONG C, MAI Y Y, HE X B, et al. A study on operational efficiency of hi-tech startups in China based on DEA methods[J]. Journal of Management Science, 2014, 27(2):26-37.]
[19] CHARNES A, COOPER W W, RHODES E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2(6):429-444.
[20] 李东兵, 高鹤. 基于DEA模型的中国城市创意产业效率评价[J]. 大连海事大学学报(社会科学版), 2014, 13(4):10-13.
[21] 魏权龄. 数据包络分析[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2006.
[22] 王筱磊. 中国社会经济发展状况分析——基于人类发展指数(HDI)的研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学硕士学位论文, 2014.[WANG X L. The analysis of Chinese development in social and economic aspects[D]. Changchun:Master Dissertation of Jilin University, 2014.]
[23] 杨家亮. 中国人文发展指数比较分析[J]. 调研世界, 2014(1):10-13.
[24] 姜绵峰, 叶春明. 上海城市生态足迹动态研究-基于ARIMA模型[J]. 华东经济管理, 2015, 29(1):18-24.[JIANG M F, YE C M. A dynamic research on Shanghai urban ecological footprint-based on the ARIMA model[J]. East China Economic Management, 2015, 29(1):18-24.]
[25] United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Human Development Report 2010[R]. New York:UNDP, 2010. http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr2010/.
[26] 世界银行(World Bank)数据库中国官网[EB/OL].[2015-01-12]. http://data.worldbank.org.cn/.
[27] 世界自然基金会(WWF)中国官网[EB/OL].[2015-01-21]. http://www.wwfchina.org/.
[28] 联合国开发计划署. 2011年人类发展报告(可持续性与平等:共享美好未来)[R]. 纽约:联合国开发计划署, 2011.

相关文章 15

[1]	李莹, 林文鹏, 宗玮. 基于改进模型的区域生态足迹动态分析——以江苏省南通市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(04): 500-507.
[2]	成定平, 淦苏美. 长江经济带高技术产业投入产出效率分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(03): 325-332.
[3]	张童, 陈爽, 姚士谋, 高群, 张家旗. 南京市生态足迹时空特征及脱钩效应分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(03): 350-358.
[4]	罗文斌, 孟贝, 钟诚. 农地整理项目治理绩效及影响因素研究——以浙江省48个国投项目为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(02): 180-189.
[5]	卢曦, 许长新. 基于三阶段DEA与Malmquist指数分解的长江经济带水资源利用效率研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(01): 7-14.
[6]	叶潇潇, 赵一飞. 基于聚类分析的长江三角洲港口群可持续发展水平评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(Z1): 17-24.
[7]	胡雪萍, 李丹青. 城镇化进程中生态足迹的动态变化及影响因素分析——以安徽省为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(02): 300-306.
[8]	田玲玲, 罗静, 董莹, 刘和涛, 曾菊新. 湖北省生态足迹和生态承载力时空动态研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(02): 316-325.
[9]	卢新海, 柯善淦. 基于生态足迹模型的区域水资源生态补偿量化模型构建——以长江流域为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(02): 334-341.
[10]	史军, 穆海振. 大城市应对气候变化的可持续发展研究——以上海为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(01): 1-8.
[11]	焦雯珺, 闵庆文, 李文华, Anthony M. Fuller. 基于ESEF的水生态承载力评估——以太湖流域湖州市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(01): 147-155.
[12]	吴传清, 董旭. 环境约束下长江经济带全要素能源效率的时空分异研究——基于超效率DEA模型和ML指数法[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(10): 1646-1653.
[13]	胡鸿兴, 何伟, 沈虹, 王钰. 湖北“两圈”区域发展可持续性评价与预测[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(04): 351-.
[14]	郝丽莎, 赵媛. 江苏省能源可持续发展模式初探[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(01): 7-.
[15]	冷罗生. 日本应对面源污染的法律措施[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(9): 871-.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed