长江流域资源与环境 >> 2016, Vol. 25 >> Issue (02): 342-349.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201602021

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    

明清苏浙沿海台风风暴潮灾害序列重建与特征分析

王洪波   

  1. 北京大学城市与环境学院历史地理研究中心, 北京 100871
  • 收稿日期:2015-05-19 修回日期:2015-09-13 出版日期:2016-02-20
  • 作者简介:王洪波(1987~),男,博士研究生,研究方向为历史时期环境变迁.E-mail:whb2010@pku.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41230634,41330748)

RESEARCH ON SEQUENCE RECONSTRUCTION AND CHARACTERISTICS DIAGNOSIS OF TYPHOON STORM SURGES AFFECTING JIANGSU AND ZHEJIANG, AD1368-1911

WANG Hong-bo   

  1. College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
  • Received:2015-05-19 Revised:2015-09-13 Online:2016-02-20
  • Supported by:
    the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41230634 and 41330748)

摘要: 在系统搜集、整理明清苏浙沿海潮灾记录基础上,建立风暴潮频率辨识方法,复原台风风暴潮灾害750次,据此建立逐年风暴潮频率序列。分析显示,1460~1480年、1570~1595年、1715~1745年、1785~1810年、1880~1890年为风暴潮活跃期。明清苏浙沿海风暴潮存在45 a、25 a、14 a三种时间尺度周期,其中45 a周期最为显著。气候跃变分析表明,1402年、1457年、1566年、1624年、1652年、1711年、1846年、1880年风暴潮活动趋于活跃;1444年、1477年、1543年、1634年、1799年、1856年风暴潮趋于平静。与1470年以来温度距平曲线对比显示,气候冷暖与风暴潮发生频率有一定正相关性,全球变暖背景下苏浙沿海可能面临更为严重的风暴潮威胁。苏浙地区明清时期风暴潮灾害空间分布差异明显,大部分风暴潮记载集中于长三角、杭州湾地区,苏北地区风暴潮数量少但影响范围广,浙东地区受地形和经济发展程度影响,风暴潮记载数量少且集中于滨海。

关键词: 明清时期, 苏浙地区, 风暴潮序列, 特征分析

Abstract: Storm surge wasthe most deadly natural disasters to low coastal areas. According to historical archives of Ming Qing Dynasty and the Republic of China, supplemented with contemporary extraction, 3789 notes which recorded tide disasters occurred in Jiangsu and Zhejiang from 1368 to 1911 were collected. Using the direct and indirect evidences of storm surges, 2119 notes were sorted out. A method to reconstruct the frequency of storm surges was also established according to the time of records and adjacent relationship. Using this method and basing on these historical notes, in this research 787 storm surges in Jiangsu and Zhejiang from 1368 to 1911 were reconstructed, and the temporal distribution curve of the storm surges was analyzed. The result showed that: During the year of 1460-1480, 1570-1595, 1715-1745, 1785-181 and 1880-1890 storm surges were more frequent than average. During the year of 1390-1410, 1445-1465, 1480-1510, 1545-1570, 1600-1630, 1680-1715 and 179-1825 storm surges were less frequent than average.Wavelet analysis showed that the sequence of storm surges has the main period of 45 years, 25 years and 14 years. The 45 years wasthe most notable period, which decided the features of storm surges in the long term. Moving t-test demonstratedthat in the year of 1402, 1444, 1477, 1566, 1624, 1634, 1711, 1799, 1846, 1856, 1875 and 1880, storm surge may experience climatic jump.Further analysis showed that in the year of 1402, 1457, 1566, 1624, 1652, 1711, 1846 and 1880, storm surge tended to be more active.In the year of 1444, 1477, 1543, 1634, 1799 and 1856, storm surge tended to be quiet. Comparison between storm surges sequence and annual temperature departure showed that the number of storm surge was significantly correlated to temperature but the response of storm surges was hysteretic. This may indicated that in the context of global warming,the threat of storm surges in Jiangsu and Zhejiang wouldrise.The distribution of storm surges can be divided into four regions, namely North Jiangsu, Yangtze River Delta, Hangzhou Bay and East Zhejiang. Most storm surges concentrated inYangtze River Delta and Hangzhou Bay, which was less in North Jiangsu and East Zhejiang. Influence scope of storm surge in North Jiangsu was quite vast, which only concentrated in seashore when it occurred in East Zhejiang. Storm surge can influence Liuhe along the Yangtze River and influence Taoyuan along the Huai River (the Old Yellow River).

Key words: Ming and Qing dynasties, Jiangsu and Zhejiang, sequence of storm surges, characteristics analysis

中图分类号: 

  • P444
[1] VON STORCH H, WOTH K. Storm surges:perspectives and options[J]. Sustainability Science, 2008, 3(1):33-43.
[2] ZONG Y Q, TOOLEY M J.A historical record of coastal floods in Britain:frequencies and associated storm tracks[J]. Natural Hazards, 2003, 29(1):13-36.
[3] BAART F, BAKKER M A J, VAN DONGEREN A, et al. Using 18th century storm-surge data from the Dutch Coast to improve the confidence in flood-risk estimates[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2011, 11(10):2791-2801.
[4] CUNNINGHAM A C, BAKKER M A J, VAN HETEREN S, et al. Extracting storm-surge data from coastal dunes for improved assessment of flood risk[J]. Geology, 2011, 39(11):1063-1066.
[5] DE KRAKER A M J. A method to assess the impact of high tides, storms and storm surges as vital elements in climatic history the case of stormy weather and dikes in the northern part of Flanders, 1488 to 1609[J]. Climatic Change, 1999, 43(1):287-302.
[6] DE KRAKER A M J.Reconstruction of storm frequency in the North Sea Area of the pre-industrial period, 1400-1625 and the connection with reconstructed time series of temperatures[J]. History of Meteorology, 2005(2):51-69.
[7] DE KRAKER A M J. Storminess in the low Countries, 1390-1725[J]. Environment and History, 2013, 19(2):149-171.
[8] NEEDHAM H F, KEIM B D. A storm surge database for the US Gulf Coast[J]. International Journal of Climatology, 2012, 32(14):2108-2123.
[9] 刘安国. 我国东海和南海沿岸的历史风暴潮探讨[J]. 青岛海洋大学学报, 1990, 20(3):25-38.[LIU A G. on the historical storm surges along the coasts of the East China Sea and the South China Sea[J].Periodical of Ocean University of China, 1990, 20(3):25-38.]
[10] 潘凤英. 历史时期江浙沿海特大风暴潮研究[J]. 南京师范大学学报, 1995, 18(1):94-100.[PAN F Y. On the huge windstorm tide during historical times in the coastal areas of Jiangsu and Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 1995, 18(1):94-100.]
[11] 杨桂山. 中国沿海风暴潮灾害的历史变化及未来趋向[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2000, 9(3):23-30.[YANG G S. Historical change and future trends of storm surge disaster in China's coastal area[J].Journal of Natural Disasters, 2000, 9(3):23-30.]
[12] 潘威, 满志敏, 刘大伟, 等. 1644-1911年中国华东与华南沿海台风入境频率[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(11):2195-2204.[PAN W, MAN Z M, LIU D W, et al. The changing of Chinese coastal typhoon frequency based on historical documents, 1644-1911AD[J]. Geographical Research, 2014, 33(11):2195-2204.]
[13] 潘威, 王美苏, 满志敏, 等. 1644~1911年影响华东沿海的台风发生频率重建[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(2):237-241.[PAN W, WANG M S, MAN Z M, et al. Reconstruction of the affecting East China typhoon frequency,1644~1911AD[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2012, 21(2):237-241.]
[14] ZHANG X P, YE Y, FANG X Q, et al. Reconstruction of typhoons in the Yangtze River Delta during 1644-1949AD based on historical chorographies[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2012, 22(5):810-824.
[15] 张向萍, 叶瑜, 方修琦. 公元1644-1949年长江三角洲地区历史台风频次序列重建[J]. 古地理学报, 2013, 15(2):283-292.[ZHANG X P, YE Y, FANG X Q. Reconstructing series of historical typhoon frequency from 1644 AD to 1949 AD in Yangtze River Delta area[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2013, 15(2):283-292.]
[16] 张丕远. 中国历史气候变化[M]. 济南:山东科学技术出版社, 1996:207.
[17] 张向萍, 叶瑜, 王辉. 从1849年长江中下游地区洪涝灾害记录谈整编方志资料的使用[J]. 古地理学报, 2011, 13(2):229-235.[ZHANG X P, YE Y, WANG H. Discussion on application of chorographic compilations from flood disaster records in Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River in 1849[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2011, 13(2):229-235.]
[18] 张文英. 雍正崇明县志卷17祥祲[M]. 北京大学图书馆藏清抄本.
[19] 谢庭薰, 陆锡熊. 乾隆娄县志卷15祥异[M]. 清乾隆五十三年[1788] 刻本.
[20] 缪荃荪. 民国江苏省通志稿·灾异志[M]. 南京:江苏古籍出版社, 1991.
[21] 李亨特, 平恕. 乾隆绍兴府志卷80祥异[M]. 清乾隆五十七年[1792] 刻本.
[22] 何士祁, 周墉. 道光川沙抚民厅志卷与水利志[M]. 清道光十七年[1837] 刻本.
[23] 明孝宗实录[M]. 台北:台湾中央研究院历史语言研究所1962年影印, 1653.
[24] 明史卷28五行志[M]. 北京:中华书局, 1974:450.
[25] 王文, 谢志仁. 中国历史时期海面变化(Ⅰ)——塘工兴废与海面波动[J]. 河海大学学报, 1999, 27(4):7-11.[WANG W, XIE Z R. Historical sea level fluctuations in China(Ⅰ)-seawall engineering and sea level change[J]. Journal of Hohai University, 1999, 27(4):7-11.]
[26] GE Q S, ZHANG X Z, HAO Z X, et al. Rates of temperature change in China during the past 2000 years[J]. Science ChinaEarth Sciences, 2011, 54(11):1627-1634.
[1] 黄亚男, 纪道斌, 龙良红, 刘德富, 宋林旭, 苏青青. 三峡库区典型支流春季特征及其水华优势种差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(03): 461-470.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 曾慧卿. 近40年气候变化对江西自然植被净第一性生产力的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 227 .
[2] 杨 选. 国内外典型水治理模式及对武汉水治理的借鉴[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(5): 584 .
[3] 徐祖信,叶建锋. 前置库技术在水库水源地面源污染控制中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 792 -795 .
[4] 李恒鹏,杨桂山,刘晓玫,万荣荣. 流域土地利用变化的长周期水文效应及管理策略[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 450 -455 .
[5] 廖顺宝,李泽辉. 四川省人口分布与土地利用的关系及人口数据空间化试验[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(6): 557 -561 .
[6] 张青青,张世熔,李婷,张林,林晓利,. 基于多元数据的景观格局演变及其影响因素——以流沙河流域宜东段为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 125 -130 .
[7] 周国忠,冯海霞. 浙江省旅游资源地区差异研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 157 -163 .
[8] 梁流涛, 曲福田, 王春华. 基于DEA方法的耕地利用效率分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 242 .
[9] 董林水, 张旭东, 周金星, 李冬雪. 青藏铁路沿线北段植被物种丰富度及盖度的动态变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 551 .
[10] 罗璐琴, 周敬宣, 李湘梅. 生态足迹动态预测模型构建与分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 440 .